1 / 21

Closing the Literacy Achievement Gap with Early Intervention

Closing the Literacy Achievement Gap with Early Intervention. Emily M. Rodgers Chuang Wang Francisco X. Gomez-Bellenge The Ohio State University AERA, San Diego, April 2004. The Problem.

terryal
Télécharger la présentation

Closing the Literacy Achievement Gap with Early Intervention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Closing the Literacy Achievement Gap with Early Intervention Emily M. Rodgers Chuang Wang Francisco X. Gomez-Bellenge The Ohio State University AERA, San Diego, April 2004

  2. The Problem Mounting statistical evidence continues to document that a literacy achievement gap exists between students along race/ethnicity and economic lines (Lee, 2002; West, Denton & Reaney, 2001; Zill & West, 2000)

  3. Theoretical Frame • Research shows that certain demographic groups under perform academically relative to other groups (Lee, 2002) • Closing this gap will take more than a quick fix (Bainbridge & Lasley, 2002) • One-to-one teaching is widely used for children having reading difficulties (Wasik & Slavin, 1993) • Can one-to-one teaching make a difference to the achievement gap?

  4. Research Question 1 Does a literacy achievement gap exist along race/ethnicity and economic lines within a random sample of first grade students?

  5. Research Question 2 Do students who have had an opportunity for a full treatment of Reading Recovery close the literacy achievement gap along race/ethnicity and economic lines with a random sample of first grade students?

  6. Research Question 3 Do students who have been successfully discontinued from Reading Recovery (a subset of the treatment group) close the literacy achievement gap along race/ethnicity and economic lines with a random sample of first grade students?

  7. 200 school districts and 536 schools in a Midwestern state Children served (n= 6,447) Treatment Group (n=4,764) Discontinued Group (n = 3,499) Comparison Group (n = 1,038) 2 students selected at random from each RR school Some were served by RR All Data collected in 2002-2003 Participants

  8. Study Groups: All ns=126

  9. Measure: Observation Survey (Clay, 2002) Concepts About Print (CAP) Range: 0 - 37 Cronbach’s alpha = .78 (Clay, 1993) Hearing and Recording Sounds in Words (HRSW) Range: 0 - 37 Cronbach’s alpha = .96 (Pinnell et al, 1994) Text Reading Level (TRL) Range: 0 - 30 Cronbach’s alpha = .83 Item separation reliability = .98

  10. Experimental Design Independent t-tests were conducted to determine if fall and spring gaps for the three reading measures existed between relevant groups on each measure. The alpha level was pre-set at .05 and Bonferroni adjustments were used to adjust the p-values since these are pre-planned comparisons. A standardized effect size estimate (Cohen’s d) for each significant difference was calculated with the pooled standard deviation (Rosnow & Rosenthal, 1996).

  11. Fall No significant difference on HRSW or TRL Significant difference for CAP (d =.48) Spring Significant differences on all 3 measures: CAP (d = .37) HRSW (d = .26) TRL (d = .32) Random Sample by Race

  12. Does the gap open along race/ethnicity lines?

  13. Fall Significant differences on all 3 measures: CAP (d = .70) HRSW (d = .70) TRL (d = .57) Spring Significant differences on all 3 measures: CAP (d = .46) HRSW (d = .40) TRL (d = .69) Random Sample by Economic Status

  14. Does the gap open along Economic Status lines?

  15. Fall Significant differences on all 3 measures: CAP (d = 1.05) HRSW (d = .96) TRL (d = .79) Spring No significant difference on CAP or HRSW Significant difference on TRL, d = .63) Discontinued Group versus Random Sample by Race

  16. Is RR closing the gap along race/ethnicity lines?

  17. Fall Significant differences on all 3 measures: CAP (d = 1.12) HRSW (d = 1.51) TRL (d = .97) Spring No significant difference on CAP or HRSW Significant difference on TRL (d = .63) Discontinued Group versus Random Sample by Economic Status

  18. Is RR closing the gap along Economic Status lines?

  19. Discussion • A gap exists in fall and is either maintained or opens further in the general population when groups are disaggregated by Race or EconomicStatus • Students served by Reading Recovery either close the gap or trend towards closing the gap

  20. Closing the Gap • Reading Recovery spoils the predictions of failure for low achieving first grade students. • An effective intervention can have a statistically measurable impact, even on a large scale. • Group comparisons were made across two dimensions simultaneously; low achieving readers versus average readers and at-risk groups versus not at-risk groups.

  21. Limitations & Future Studies • Only independent t-tests were used for comparison purposes • This is a study of RR only. No comparisons were made to other reading interventions • Need to investigate factors such as race/ethnicity, Economic Status, RR and school district that are related to students’ reading achievement with regression analysis or hierarchical linear modeling.

More Related