1 / 10

ILC BSY Tune-up Dump Issues

ILC BSY Tune-up Dump Issues. most recent NLC design (May 2003) high bandwidth ( ± 20% acceptance to dump) uses scaled SLC SBD kicker magnets to extract (abort & tune-up) has no beam energy diagnostics extraction timing (kicker pulse length, etc.) not considered

tevin
Télécharger la présentation

ILC BSY Tune-up Dump Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ILC BSY Tune-up Dump Issues • most recent NLC design (May 2003) • high bandwidth (±20% acceptance to dump) • uses scaled SLC SBD kicker magnets to extract (abort & tune-up) • has no beam energy diagnostics • extraction timing (kicker pulse length, etc.) not considered • Brett Parker’s “fast extraction” design (March 2003) • purpose-designed magnets • incorporates energy diagnostic chicane • minimal optics • design a hybrid system for ILC • proper diagnostics and timing for ILC bunch trains • Brett’s magnets (perhaps updated designs) • high bandwidth • PAC′05 abstract submitted, but … ILC BDS Meeting (M. Woodley)

  2. NLC2003 kickers (5) L = 3 m θ = 1 mrad > 5 kG @ 500 GeV • TESLA “Type B” quadrupole • Lcore = 1.5 m • bore radius = 10 mm • max pole-tip field = 7.9 kG ILC BDS Meeting (M. Woodley)

  3. Y (mm) X (mm) beam centroid motion at dump face versus energy offset (TURTLE tracking) ILC BDS Meeting (M. Woodley)

  4. Brett’s 2003 ILC BDS Meeting (M. Woodley)

  5. VKI QFEX Note: dipoles will be offset in order to center all trajectories in the gaps BTU(2) BTU(2) BTU(1) QX4 QX1 HKI/TUD BMP(1) BMP(2) BMP(3) QX3 QX2 ILC BDS Meeting (M. Woodley)

  6. kickers (24) L = 1 m θ = 40 μrad 0.35 kG @ 250 GeV ΔT = 150 ns ΔV = 7 kV See Brett’s presentations at: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~mdw/ILC/Fast_Extraction/BParker20030319.pdf and http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~mdw/ILC/Fast_Extraction/BParker20030415.pdf ILC BDS Meeting (M. Woodley)

  7. ILC2005 ΔL = 35 m σx = 35 μm ηX = 12 mm 2% ΔE →Δx = 240 μm ≈ 7σx ILC BDS Meeting (M. Woodley)

  8. ILC BDS Meeting (M. Woodley)

  9. 8 cm bore quad TESLA “Type B” BMP(2) BMP(3) HKI/TUD BMP(1) EBPM ΔE = +20% ΔS (EBPM to 1st HKI) = 67 m (≈ 450 nsec) ΔE = -20% ILC BDS Meeting (M. Woodley)

  10. What’s Next • achromat optics • 1st 8 cm bore quad … Panofsky? • timing issues • revisit dump window survivability … do we need to “paint”? • tracking studies • … not in time for PAC′05 (mea culpa) ILC BDS Meeting (M. Woodley)

More Related