1 / 15

Terry Tyborowski Deputy Assistant Secretary,

Budget Update and Program Outlook. Terry Tyborowski Deputy Assistant Secretary, Program Planning and Budget for Environmental Management February 27, 2014. EM Budget Update. Budget Timeline: FY 2013. March 26 th : full-year CR (with sequestration) . Sep. 28 th : S ix month CR passed.

thanos
Télécharger la présentation

Terry Tyborowski Deputy Assistant Secretary,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Budget Update and Program Outlook Terry Tyborowski Deputy Assistant Secretary, Program Planning and Budget for Environmental Management February 27, 2014

  2. EM Budget Update

  3. Budget Timeline: FY 2013 March 26th:full-year CR (with sequestration) Sep. 28th: Six month CR passed July – Sep. Jun. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jan. 1st: Congress passed a two month delay to sequestration May 15th: Reprogramming to align funding within program

  4. Budget Timeline: FY 2014 Events and FY 2015 Outlook Dec 26th: Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 signed into law President releases FY 2015 Budget Oct. 17th – Jan. 18th: EM fundingat $4.9B level ($700M below request) Oct. 1st – 16th: Lapse in appropriations severely impacts EM operations July – Sep. Jun. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jan 17th: Full-year appropriation funds EM $208M above request Sep. 30th – Deadline for Congress to pass an appropriation for FY 2015 Oct. 17tH: Congress passes Continuing Resolution, ending lapse in appropriations

  5. FY 2014 Budget Passed January 17th, 2014 Congressional Hearing Room

  6. Temporary Relief from the Budget Control Act of 2011 The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 • Sets overall discretionary spending for the current fiscal year at $1.012 trillion—about halfway between the Senate budget level of $1.058 trillion and the House budget level of $967 billion. • The agreement would provide $63 billion in sequester relief over two years, split evenly between defense and non-defense programs. • In fiscal year 2014, defense discretionary spending would be set at $520.5 billion, and non-defense discretionary spending would be set at $491.8 billion. • Sequester relief in 2014 and 2015 is fully offset by savings elsewhere in the federal budget.

  7. EM’s Recent Budget History $411M Funding Reduction from Sequestration Funding Increase in FY14 Omnibus Appropriation $319M Reduction from CR Rules (dollars in millions) *Annualized funding level from the temporary continuing resolution

  8. EM Long-Term Budget History Historical EM Average Funding Level: $6.2 billion (Dollars in billions)

  9. EM’s FY 2014 Budget: Funding by Mission Area $414M Total Funding: $5.830 Billion $155M * $442M $2,007M $797M $855M *Includes Program Direction, Program Support, TDD, Post Closure Administration and Community and Regulatory Support $1,160M

  10. EM Funding by Site in FY 2014 Total Funding: $5.830 Billion

  11. Key Planned Activities for FY 2014 Operational Tank Closures 5 & 6 – SRS, SC Waste Shipment – Carlsbad, NM IWTU Hot Operations – Idaho National Lab, ID K-25 D&D – Oak Ridge, TN

  12. Strategic Planning Initiatives

  13. Impact of Funding Reductions on Purchasing Power • EM’s funding is divided between two main categories: The costs of maintaining a safe, secure and operations ready posture (“Maintenance Dollars”) and the costs of performing active cleanup work (“Progress Dollars”). • Funding reductions disproportionately impact “Progress Dollars,” since maintenance costs are largely fixed. • High maintenance costs are driven in part by the 78 Hazard Category 2 and 3 Nuclear Facilities managed by EM (more than any other DOE program). Remaining dollars available for progress continues to decrease Inflation continues to increase maintenance/ support costs

  14. Complete evaluation of infrastructure and maintenance activities in order to: • Identify specific activities • Understand requirements driving those activities • Compare information/best practices across sites Path Forward Hanford River Corridor cleanup • Evaluate effectiveness of improvements on an annual basis, propose improvements to the initiatives, and implement best practices complex-wide Idaho facility demolition

  15. EM Online Timeline • EM is developing a timeline that will show historical accomplishments at each site and tell the story of the EM mission. • The timeline will be viewable at the complex level and will also be viewable by site, by state, and by mission area. • Links to videos, photos, documents, presentations, and other materials for each event will provide a wide range of historical information in one centralized location. • The timeline is not a static application and will be updated as accomplishments warrant. Planned, future events may be added at a later time.

More Related