1 / 18

Effects of species composition on schooling preferences in glowlight tetras

Effects of species composition on schooling preferences in glowlight tetras. By Avery Nagy-MacArthur, Cybele Sabitry & Samantha Shaw. Introduction. Schooling is an important form of social organization among fish Predator avoidance “dilution effect” increases as school size increases

thea
Télécharger la présentation

Effects of species composition on schooling preferences in glowlight tetras

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effects of species composition on schooling preferences in glowlight tetras By Avery Nagy-MacArthur, Cybele Sabitry & Samantha Shaw

  2. Introduction • Schooling is an important form of social organization among fish • Predator avoidance • “dilution effect” increases as school size increases • Confusion effect • Increase feeding success • Improves detection of food resources • Increases competition between individuals within school • Overcome interspecific competition by schooling to access resources defended by competitor

  3. Introduction • Schools may be composed of a single species or variety of species • Conspecific fish school only with their own species • Heterospecific fish school with other species

  4. Are schooling preferences dependent on relative school composition? • Heterospecific schooling may be advantageous for duller fish if they can associate with brighter fish • Advantage depends on relative composition of school dull fish < bright fish

  5. Test subjects Glowlight tetra (Hemigrammus erythrozonus) • Heterospecific schooler Neon tetra (Cheirodon innesi) • Conspecific schooler

  6. Hypothesis • Schooling preference will change based on species composition of available schools • As the proportion of conspecifics in an available school increases, glowlight tetras will increase their preference for the school composed completely of neon tetras

  7. Procedure • Offered test fish two different schools • Acclimated test fish for 3-5 minutes • Every 30 s recorded position of fish, for 15 min • Reversed jars and switched test subject • 4 trials for each of three treatments = 12 tests total (24 test fish)

  8. Split treatment 4 glowlight tetras 4 neon tetras 8 neon tetras

  9. Conspecific-weighted treatment 6 glowlight tetras 2 neon tetras 8 neon tetras

  10. Heterospecific-weighted treatment 2 glowlight tetras 6 neon tetras 8 neon tetras

  11. Results Heterospecific-weighted treatment

  12. Split treatment

  13. Conspecific-weighted treatment

  14. Discussion • High variation in data • Possible trend for?? • More time spent with heterospecifics when the proportion of conspecifics is low • Increasing proportion of conspecifics may increase time spent with mixed school

  15. BUT… • Our sample size was small (24 test fish used) • We couldn’t control for sex or age of test fish • May have repeatedly sampled some test fish due to small source population • External environmental influences (shadows, reflections, etc)

  16. Other influences on schooling: • Fish may prefer familiar heterospecifics over foreign conspecifics • Variation in size may have influenced schooling preference • Social hierarchies developed while kept as a group could have caused test fish to avoid certain individuals regardless of species

  17. Suggestions for further research • Taking into account importance of chemical cues • Controlling for size differences • Larger sample size • Better control over environmental conditions of fish both during and outside of experiment

  18. QUESTIONS ?

More Related