1 / 34

Propagation of cosmic rays

This study focuses on the physics of cosmic ray propagation, indirect detection through antimatter, and the uncertainties surrounding the existence, distribution, and propagation of dark matter particles. It explores the use of cosmic ray data to determine propagation parameters and constrain astrophysical uncertainties.

Télécharger la présentation

Propagation of cosmic rays

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Propagation of cosmic rays Richard Taillet Université de Savoie & LAPTH (Annecy-le-Vieux, France) & D. Maurin,  P. Salati,  F. Donato,  J. Lavalle,  T. Delahaye, A. Putze, L. Derome, N. Fornengo...

  2. Three points: •  Physics of propagation • Indirect detection through antimatter •  Clumps/boost factors

  3. Context dark matter particles can annihilate and create other particles  → indirect detection neutral     : neutrinos and gamma-rays charged   : electrons, positrons, protons, antiprotons e.g. To be able to perform indirect detection, one must be able to tell the signal from the background. Antimatter particles have a lower background and should be easier to detect in cosmic rays.

  4. Context • In the context of Dark Matter indirect detection, three main uncertainties : •  existence/properties of the dark matter particle ? •  distribution in space and in velocity space ? •  propagation of the annihilation products • Propagation is important for two reasons : •  to predict the signal (antiprotons, positrons from DM annihilation) •  to understand the background (primaries + secondaries from spallation) • The two studies must be done in a consistent way ! • same propagation model with same physical effects • same parameters

  5. Context • The two studies must be done in a consistent way ! • same propagation model with same physical effects • same parameters

  6. Context • The two studies must be done in a consistent way ! • same propagation model with same physical effects • same parameters

  7. Propagation Propagation of charged particles (positrons, antiprotons) is determined by the structure of the Galactic magnetic field. Regular component + stochastic component, probably associated with turbulence  → fluctuations of the magnetic field on every scale → energy-dependent diffusion : diffusion is more efficient at high energy

  8. Propagation 1/ secondary/primary ratios (e.g. B/C) → grammage (column density ~ 10 g/cm2) → confinement (provided by diffusion). 2/ radioactive species : nuclear clocks → time spent in the diffusion zone → cosmic rays spend most of their time in a empty halo (diffusive halo). Cosmic rays are confined inside a zone larger than the Galactic disk

  9. Propagation • solve a diffusion equation, taking into account: • diffusion (diffusion coefficient ? anisotropic ? inhomogeneous ?) • escape (boundary conditions, geometry of diffusion volume) • spallations (creation/destruction, cross-sections, interstellar medium) • Sources (distribution, spectra) • energy losses • diffusive reaccerelation • galactic wind (convection) • inelastic non annihilating reactions (for antiprotons)

  10. Propagation caracteristic times spallation losses 106 spallation t (Myr) 103 1 escape 1 10 100 Ek (GeV/nuc)

  11. Propagation • Different approaches to model propagation: • Leaky Box : escape time, distribution of grammages • Diffusion equation :  • numerical resolution (GALPROP, Strong & Moskalenko) • semi-analytical resolution (USINE, Maurin et al.) • Note : USINE will be publicly released within a few months

  12. Propagation Diffusion parameters Diffusion coefficient Height of diffusive halo Alfvèn velocity (reacc.) Gal. wind velocity (convection)

  13. Propagation Diffusion parameters Diffusion coefficient Height of diffusive halo Alfvèn velocity (reacc.) Gal. wind velocity (convection) Related to the kind of magnetic turbulence : no consensus

  14. Propagation Diffusion parameters Diffusion coefficient Height of diffusive halo Alfvèn velocity (reacc.) Gal. wind velocity (convection) Related to the amplitude of turbulence

  15. Propagation Diffusion parameters Diffusion coefficient Height of diffusive halo Alfvèn velocity (reacceleration) Galactic wind velocity (convection) ~ 10 g cm-2 Mean grammage is determined by L/D

  16. Propagation If the galactic disk was flattened, it would look like a sheet of usual paper, crossed about 10 000 times by every cosmic ray nucleus ~ 10 g cm-2 Mean grammage is determined by L/D

  17. Propagation • General facts about propagation • The range of propagation is limited by escape, spallation and decay • Propagation of nuclei and antiprotons can be studied at a given energy per nucleon, as a first approximation • Propagation of positrons is dominated by energy losses

  18. Propagation Taillet, Maurin, A&A 402 (2003) 971

  19. Propagation • The propagation parameters can be determined (or at least constrained) by the study of cosmic ray nuclei: • For a given set of parameters, • compute B/C • compare to data • keep if good • Astrophysical uncertainties (assuming the model is correct): • distribution of sources • distribution of interstellar matter • energy losses (Lavalle & Delahaye 2010) • nuclear cross-sections

  20. Propagation Results from a systematic exploration of the parameter space Maurin et al. 2001

  21. Propagation Results from a Monte Carlo Markov Chain analysis (MCMC) Putze, Derome, Maurin, astro-ph/1001.0551 Putze et al. 2010

  22. Propagation • This procedure gives regions of the parameter space which are consistent with CR nuclei, not a unique value for each parameter. • sub-Fe/Fe does not help much • radioactive species could, but actually do not really Half-lives are 1.5 Myr for 10Be, 0.9 Myr for 26Al, 0.3 Myr for 36Cl.

  23. Propagation - Local Bubble Radioactive species could help determine L. But they are very sensitive to the local structure of the interstellar medium (local bubble)

  24. Propagation – Local Bubble The presence of the local bubble strongly affects the fluxes of radioactive species Putze, Derome, Maurin, astro-ph/1001.0551

  25. Antiprotons from spallation Results for secondary antiprotons (background) Uncertainty on the parameterizations of nuclear cross sections (but proton flux rather well measured)

  26. Antiprotons from dark matter Examples of results for antiprotons from exotic sources Kaluza-Klein, m = 50 GeV/c2 neutralino m = 300 GeV/c2 Donato et al. 2004

  27. Antiprotons from dark matter • Very sensitive to L, for two reasons: if L si higher, •  Confinement is more efficient •  More sources in the diffusive halo

  28. Positrons from spallations Created through decay of pions produced in p-p collisions Propagation dominated by energy losses (synchrotron & inverse Compton upon CMB/starlight)

  29. Positrons from spallations Example of results for secondary positrons

  30. positrons [make nasty remark here …  ] Adriani et al., Nature 458 (2009) 607

  31. Antimatter from dark matter Results for positrons from DM annihilation

  32. Antimatter from dark matter clumpiness The Dark Matter distribution must be clumpy → enhancement of the indirect detection signal (boost factor) via lactea simulation of a galactic halo

  33. Antimatter from dark matter When the diffusion range is short, we are very sensitive to the graininess of the source distribution → larger variance of the predicted flux • This shows: • at low energy for antiprotons • at high energy for positrons positrons antiprotons Lavalle, Yuhan, Maurin & Bi, A&A 479 (2008) 427

  34. Conclusions • Signal and background must be studied within the same framework • There is no « standard model » for propagation parameters • Clumpiness does not simply translates into a boost factor

More Related