1 / 35

Upper Kanawha Tributary Watersheds TMDL Status Update Meeting

This meeting provides an update on the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) project for the Upper Kanawha Tributary Watersheds in West Virginia. Topics include an introduction to TMDLs, overview of the project status, allocation strategies, and Q&A.

Télécharger la présentation

Upper Kanawha Tributary Watersheds TMDL Status Update Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Upper Kanawha Tributary Watersheds TMDL Status Update Meeting August 12, 2014 Kanawha City Office

  2. Agenda • “Introduction to TMDLs” recap • Overview of TMDL Project & Status • Overview of Allocation Strategies • Discussion – Free form questions and answers

  3. What’s a TMDL? • “Total Maximum Daily Load” • How much pollutant a stream can receive and remain healthy • Pollution Budget - prescribes reductions (where needed) of pollutants that result in the restoration of an impaired stream • TMDL development required by Clean Water Act for streams impaired by a pollutant

  4. TMDL = S WLA + S LA + MOS • S = “sum of” • WLA = “wasteloadallocations” • LA = “load allocations” • MOS = “margin of safety” • WLAs - pollutant loads from “point sources” • Discharge from point • Need NPDES permit • LAs - pollutant loads from “nonpoint sources” and background • Precipitation/runoff driven • No permit required

  5. What’s an impaired stream? • Stream that doesn’t meet water quality standards • West Virginia Water Quality Standards are codified in 47 CSR 2 • http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/Programs/wqs/Documents/Rules/WVDEP_47CSR2_WQS_FinalRule%206_27_2011.pdf • Standards include “Designated Uses“ for WV waters and “water quality criteria” to protect those uses • Criteria can be numeric or narrative • Impaired streams are enumerated on the 303(d) list

  6. West Virginia Section 303(d) List / Integrated Report

  7. Numeric Criteria of Concern • Total Iron • Aquatic Life/Public Water Supply • Not to exceed 1.5 mg/l as a 4 day average concentration more than once in a three year period • Public Water Supply - 1.5 mg/l • Fecal Coliform • Water Contact Recreation/Public Water Supply • Shall not exceed 200 counts/100ml as a monthly geometric mean (5 samples/month) • Nor to exceed 400 counts/100 ml in more than 10% of samples in a month

  8. Numeric Criteria of Concern • Dissolved Aluminum • Aquatic Life • Not to exceed 750 ug/l as a 1 hour average concentration more than once in a three year period • Not to exceed 750 ug/l as a 4 day average concentration more than once in a three year period • pH • Aquatic Life/Water Contact Recreation/Public Water Supply (All Uses) • No values below 6.0 nor above 9.0.

  9. Numeric criteria of concern • Chloride • Aquatic Life/Water Contact Recreation/Public Water Supply • Not to exceed 230 mg/l as a 4 day average concentration more than once in a three year period • Total Manganese • Public Water Supply • Not to exceed 1.0 mg/l within a 5 mile zone immediately upstream of a water supply used for public or private consumption

  10. Numeric Criteria of Concern • Selenium • Aquatic Life/Public Water Supply • Not to exceed 20 ug/l as a 1 hour average more than once in a three year period • Not to exceed 5 ug/l as a 4 day average concentration more than once in a three year period • Public Water Supply - 50 ug/l

  11. Based on Benthic Macroinvertebrates (aquatic bugs) Stream scored based on abundance and type of bugs present Streams with impaired communities were placed on the 303(d) list and slated for TMDLs Narrative CriteriaPrevious 47 CSR 2 - 3.2.i Assessment

  12. Narrative Criteria2012 Legislative Changes • Senate Bill 562 passed by the 2012 West Virginia Legislature amended the WV Water Pollution Control Act • Requires DEP to develop and secure legislative approval of new rules to interpret 47 CSR 2-3.2.i • Section 22-11-7b : http://www.legis.state.wv.us/wvcode/ChapterEntire.cfm?chap=22&art=11 • No biological TMDLs are part of this effort • Streams currently listed as biologically impacted will undergo Stressor Identification process

  13. Stressor Identification Process • Method to evaluate stressor/s of biologically impacted streams • Process used to evaluate if numeric criteria TMDLs (iron, fecal) will address biological stressors • Information will be retained and may be used to delist streams in the future

  14. Impaired Waters 43 named streams in Upper Kanawha watershed, Mainstem Kanawha not part of this effort

  15. TMDL Watersheds

  16. MDAS Model • Watershed Model • Runs dynamically on a 1-hour time step • Represents land use (hydrologic processes) and river processes • Can include nonpoint and point sources • Streambank Erosion component - Bank Pin Study

  17. Modeling Approach • Segment watershed • Configure model to represent all sources • Calibrate model for hydrology (flow) and water quality • Metals • Iron Dis. Aluminum Manganese • Fecal • Chlorides • pH • Selenium • Sediment • Run MDAS for Baseline conditions (existing) • Run MDAS for TMDL scenario(s)

  18. Completed: Monitoring Source tracking Baseline Modeling Bio. Stressor Ids Status Update Meeting Next Steps: Allocations Draft Document Public Meeting EPA Approval Upper Kanawha WatershedProject Status

  19. Allocation Methodology • Universal Reduction of targeted sources • Streambank erosion, Failing Septics, etc • Top-down approach • Headwater subwatersheds analyzed first • Allocation strategy dictates order and magnitude of reduction • If necessary, loads are reduced then routed to downstream subwatershed

  20. Allocation Methodology • WVDEP priorities: • Ensure criteria compliance at all sws outlets • Target the primary causative sources • Strategy in general • Critical conditions must be considered • Sometimes only one significant source in sws • Always some amount of professional judgement

  21. Fecal Coliform Sources • Point sources • HAUs • Package Plants • Municipal Sewage Plant • Mining Bathouses • MS4 areas • Nonpoint source • Failing septic systems and/or straight pipe illicit discharges • Stormwater runoff from urban/residential lands • Stormwater runoff from agricultural lands

  22. Fecal Coliform Strategy • 100% reduction of all untreated sewage discharges (failing septics, straight pipes) as required by WV Bureau for Public Health regulations • Sensitivity analysis to address severity of agricultural vs. urban/residential impacts

  23. Streambank erosion Abandoned Mine Lands and seeps Bond Forfeitures Lands and seeps Upland Sediment Sources Harvested Forest Oil and Gas Agriculture Urban Residential outside MS4 areas Roads Active Mining MS4 areas Construction Stormwater General Permits Iron Sources

  24. Iron Allocation Strategy • Streambank erosion loadings reduced to best available in watershed • Sediment sources set to iron loadings equivalent to 100 mg/l TSS • Future growth for Construction Stormwater area initially allocated at 2.5% of subwatershed area • AML seeps set to WQ criteria at discharge

  25. Iron Allocation Strategy continued • Sensitivity Analysis based reductions, if needed • mining permits / bond fortfeiture reduced below baseline • sediment sources reduced below 100 mg/l TSS • Construction stormwatergrowth allowance reduced

  26. Dissolved Aluminum/pH Sources and Strategy • Horsemill Br, Sugarcamp Br, Cedar Crk • Sources • AML • Active Mining • Strategy • Evaluate effects on pH and Al(d) of any concurrent iron TMDLs being developed • Add alkalinity to counter acid effects of AML seeps, and evaluate Al(d) attainment • Sensitivity – increase alkalinity and/or reduce aluminum to attain both pH and Al(d) criteria

  27. Chloride Sources & Strategy • Source • Certain permitted mining discharges • Reductions Strategy • Mining outlets – • Reduce problematic point source discharges to criteria at end of pipe (230 mg/l)

  28. Manganese Sources & Strategy • Horsemill Branch & Sugarcamp Branch (Kelly Creek) are impaired for manganese based on proximity to drinking water intake • Sources • Bond Forfeiture • AML • Strategy • AML seeps reduced to water quality at end of pipe • Evaluate contribution from Bond Forfeiture sites and reduce as necessary

  29. Selenium Sources and Strategy • Sources • Certain permitted mining discharges • Strategy • Reduce discharges from instream structures and large volume continuous discharges to criteria • Reduce on-bench outlets as necessary to attain criteria at all subwatersheds

  30. WVDEP TMDL Process (4 yrs) • Stream Selection - (4/2011) • Pre-TMDL monitoring, source identification and characterization - (7/2011 – 6/2012) • Contract to model water quality and hydrology – (1/2013) • Determine baseline condition and allocate pollutant loads • Draft Report development • Finalization and EPA approval

  31. Upper Kanawha Watershed TMDL Path Forward • Allocate loads and wasteloads and develop draft report • Formal public comment period and public meeting on the draft TMDLs in Fall 2014 • Address comments, prepare final draft and submit to EPA for approval (final draft will include Response Summary)

  32. Contact Information • Comments should be submitted to Steve Young at Stephen.A.Young@wv.gov(10 meg limit for email) • Questions - contact Dave Montali, Jim Laine, Mike McDaniel • (304) 926-0499 • David.A.Montali@wv.gov, James.C.Laine@wv.gov, or Michael.L.McDaniel@wv.gov

  33. Discussion/Questions...

More Related