1 / 23

Area Office Interesting Cases

This report highlights workplace safety concerns at M.Mfg.Co. and The T.Co., including formaldehyde exposure, lack of PPE, unsanitary conditions, electrical hazards, and non-compliance with safety regulations. Air sampling results and inspection findings are discussed.

thomastgreen
Télécharger la présentation

Area Office Interesting Cases

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Area Office Interesting Cases M Mfg Co - Health The T Co – Joint Health & Safety Arlene Lamont, AAD

  2. M Mfg CoComplaint Inspection • The employer does not ensure that employees working in areas using formaldehyde and Bronopal are provided with ventilation exposing the employees to respiratory illnesses or health effects. • The employer does not ensure that employees working with formaldehyde and Bronopal are provided PPE.

  3. M Mfg CoComplaint Inspection • The formaldehyde dispensing equipment leaks inside the building and is not cleaned up or disposed of. • The employer does not ensure the evacuation system (grey hose and cone) is inspected and operated per manufacturer’s requirements, it is not functioning.

  4. About M Mfg Co • Non-union workforce, employs 22 • Primary operation is custom chemical blending, packaging, production, and shipping • SIC 2841 • Established in 1980 incorp. In TX

  5. Formaldehyde Blending Shop

  6. Inspection Findings/Citations • 1910.132(d)(2) – PPE hazard assessment was not completed or certified • 1910.1048(j)(3) – suitable PPE and training was not provided to perform formaldehyde leak and spill clean up • 1910.1048(c)(1) – overexposure to formaldehyde 0.75 ppm PEL • Exposed to 1.631 ppm (8-hr TWA) • 2.17 times the PEL

  7. Inspection Findings/Citations Cont. • 1910.1048(c)(2) – overexposure to formaldehyde 2 ppm STEL • Exposed to 3.20 ppm (STEL) • 1.59 times the PEL • Exposed to 2.90 ppm (STEL) • 1.45 times the PEL • 1910.1048(d)(1)(i) – failure to monitor & determine exposure to formaldehyde

  8. Inspection Findings/Citations Cont. • 1910.1048(f)(1) – failure to institute engineering/work practice controls to ensure exposures were below the TWA and the STEL • 1910.1048(g)(2)(i) – respiratory protection program was not implemented • 1910.1048(i)(1) – change room not provided • 1910.1048(i)(2) – quick drench shower not operable

  9. Inspection Findings/Citations Cont. • 1910.1048(i)(3) – eyewash not operable • 1910.1048(l)(1)(i) – medical surveillance program not implement when exposed above the action level or STEL • 1910.1048(n)(1) – no training conducted on health hazards of formaldehyde • 1910.1200(e)(1) – list of hazardous chemicals not maintained

  10. M Mfg abatement @IC • All items were abated and completed by the time of the informal conference • Documentation and training records were provided • Engineering Controls were submitted – a lid was placed on the blender, exhaust repaired and exhaust fan ventilation was added to the blender area • Air sampling results by 3rd party showed ND

  11. The T Co – Joint Health & SafetyComplaint inspection • Concrete dust and silica blows all over the yard • Restrooms, break rooms, working area are unsanitary • Electrical outlets and plugs without covers • Electrical panels left open

  12. The T Co – Joint Health & SafetyComplaint inspection Cont. • Employees not trained to operate overhead cranes, cranes not inspected • Employees exposed to fall hazards without safety rails or have damaged rails • Platforms and fixed ladders over 20 feet do not have safety cages or guard rails • Employer not logging injuries on OSHA 300 logs

  13. About T Co • Non-union workforce, employs 130 • Primary operation is the design and manufacture of concrete septic tanks, grease traps, storm cellars, and manholes • NAICS 327390 • Established in 1980 a family owned business

  14. Inspection Findings/Citations • 12 serious violations were cited under safety • Housekeeping • Electrical • No Guard rails • Ladder deficiencies • Crane bridge not equipped with trolley bumpers • 2 repeat – serious violations • Restrooms were not kept clean/sanitary • Receptacle gang boxes and switches were missing covers

  15. Inspection Findings/Citations • 3 citations issued under the health inspection • 1910.132(d)(2) - PPE hazard assessment was not completed or certified • 1910.134(k) – employees voluntary using N95 filtering face piece respirators were not provided a copy of Appendix D • 1910.1200(f)(5) – hazcom failure to label or mark hazardous chemical or hazard warning

  16. Discussion of air sample results • Heavy Equipment Operator • Respirable dust – 0.189 mg/m3 • Operator Dry Mixer • Respirable dust - 0.127 mg/m3 • Forklift driver • Respirable silica – 0.232 mg/m3 • Calculated PEL – 1.587 mg/m3 • Compared to the new standard this will be 4.64 X the PEL of 50 mg/m3

  17. Discussion of air sample results Cont. • Batch Plant Operator • Respirable dust – 0.22 mg/m3 • Quality • Respirable Silica – 3.24 mg/m3 • Calculated PEL 3.23 mg/m3 • Compared to the new standard this will be 64.8 X the PEL of 50 mg/m3

  18. QUESTIONS?

More Related