1 / 13

NDP Evaluation Process

NDP Evaluation Process. Presentation by David Hegarty , NDP/CSF Evaluation Unit Irish Evaluation Network 21 March 2003. Presentation Structure. About the NDP About the NDP/CSF Evaluation Unit NDP Evaluation Approach The Evaluation Cycle What difference has it made?.

thornton-cedric
Télécharger la présentation

NDP Evaluation Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NDP Evaluation Process Presentation by David Hegarty, NDP/CSF Evaluation Unit Irish Evaluation Network 21 March 2003

  2. Presentation Structure • About the NDP • About the NDP/CSF Evaluation Unit • NDP Evaluation Approach • The Evaluation Cycle • What difference has it made?

  3. Some Features of NDP/CSF • How big? • NDP : €50 billion in public (EU and exchequer) investment 2000 to 2006 • 7% of 2002 GNP, 20% of total gross public expenditure • CSF: €5.4 billion of which EU €3.2bn. • 6 Operational Programmes • Economic and Social Infrastructure (€23 billion) • Employment and Human Resources (€14.2 billion) • Productive Sector (€5.8 billion) • S&E region (€4.1 billion) • BMW region (€3 billion) • Peace (€.14 billion)

  4. NDP Objectives • 4 High Level Objectives • Sustainable economic and employment growth • Consolidation/improvement of competitiveness • Balanced regional development • Social inclusion • Also 4 horizontal objectives • Equality of opportunity • Environmental protection • Rural development • Poverty • Diversity of NDP and different objectives pose significant evaluation challenges

  5. The NDP/CSF Evaluation Unit • Independent Unit under Dept. of Finance, established in 1996 • Work programme set by committee • What do we do? • Assist departments with performance indicators • Responsible for interim evaluation of NDP (see later) • Advisory role in relation to wider evaluation issues • Advisory/standard-setting role re. CBA • 5 evaluator (contract) staff, 2 administrative • Budget of €4.6 million over 2000 to 2006

  6. Evaluation Approach • Approach developed over previous CSF • Based on analysis of significant volume of evaluation work carried out • Main problem • No common understanding of purpose or focus of evaluation • What are we trying to find out? • Led to adoption of 5 key evaluation questions framework • Agreed approach for 2000 to 2006

  7. 5 Evaluation Questions • Rationale • Is there a market failure? • Continued relevance • What are the implications of external developments? • Effectiveness • Are we meeting our objectives? • Efficiency • Are benefits commensurate with costs? • Could it be delivered more economically? • Impact • What difference, if any, has it made? • Overall question: are we getting value for money?

  8. Evaluation Cycle • Cycle built around EU requirements • Ex-ante evaluation • Interim evaluation • Mid-term evaluation • Ex-post evaluation

  9. Ex-Ante Evaluation • 2 stages in NDP process • Needs analysis (ESRI); preceded NDP • Formal evaluation of NDP (Evaluation Unit) • Key issues are rationale and relevance • Crucial stage in evaluation process

  10. Interim evaluation • Evaluation between ex-ante and mid-term • Responsibility of Evaluation Unit • 7 evaluations carried out over 2001/2003 • Key evaluation issues: effectiveness, relevance, efficiency • Thematic, cross programme character • Strong focus on management and implementation issues • Important input to mid-term evaluation

  11. Mid-Term Evaluation • Evaluation of each OP and NDP • Externally commissioned • For completion by Autumn 2003 • Focus – should changes be made on basis of • Performance to date (effectiveness) • Changes in socio-economic situation (continued relevance) • Evaluations input to mid-term review decisions • Govt. and Commission decide on EU money • Allocation of EU performance reserve (€130 million) • Non co-financed in estimates/budgetary context

  12. Evaluation Impact • Evaluation an important element in EU Structural Funds implementation system • EU impetus has led to improvement in capacity and expertise • Ireland seen as good evaluation performer by Commission • Current NDP marks major extension of process • Impact probably still limited in terms of influencing allocations of resources • Changing public finances position may provide a window of opportunity

  13. More Information • At www.eustructuralfunds.ie for: • Review of 1994 to 1999 evaluation process • Ex-ante evaluation, 2000 to 2006 • CSF performance indicator guidelines • Cost-benefit analysis working rules • Interim NDP/CSF evaluations, 2000 to 2006 • At www.esri.ie for Investment Priorities report, 2000 to 2006 • At www.ndp.ie for more information on NDP

More Related