1 / 15

A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning

A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning. Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor. The Planners…. Integrating District and College Planning : John Didion, Executive Vice Chancellor, Human Resources & Educational Services

tia
Télécharger la présentation

A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor

  2. The Planners… Integrating District and College Planning: John Didion, Executive Vice Chancellor, Human Resources & Educational Services Instructional Program Review at Santa Ana College: Linda Rose, Ed.D., Vice President, Academic Affairs Bonita N. Jaros, Ph.D., IE&A Coordinator, ALO Student Services Program Review at Santiago Canyon College: John Hernandez, Ph.D., Vice President, Student Services

  3. Integrating District & College Planningand District Operations’ Administrative Unit Program Review

  4. Integrating District & College Planning

  5. Instructional Services Program Review at Santa Ana College

  6. How Did We Get Here? In 2007 Midterm Report Evaluation of processes Brief historical background Planning and Budget Integration: Governance; Program Review Evaluation of Outcomes for Subsequent Budget Development Communication of Outcomes

  7. How Did We Get Here? Planning Development 2007 Program Review Model evaluated/revised for instructional, administrative services, student services, and president’s cabinet Teaching and Learning Committee formally reviews instructional program reviews. Based on recent cycle of planning we created a workgroup of the TLC to address the evaluation of the direct SLO assessment reports Many campus activities have been held, since 2007, to address the instructional program review process 2009-current: consistent evaluation of district budget allocation model (Revenue Allocation Model 361) New budget model approved by District BAPR and forwarded to Chancellor, Feb. 2012

  8. Where Are We Now? Mid-cycle Planning Retreat • Evaluating the alignment of District Plans to existing college plans • Evaluating the status of the Vision Themes and mission statement • Determine follow-up activities • Develop action plans, timelines for implementation • Evaluate current alignment of college plans to budget development

  9. Where Are We Going From Here? • Complete integration of all planning and budget processes • Develop and assess a transition plan for the new budget allocation model • Continuous evaluation of activities for Vision Themes • Continuous SLO assessments at the course, program and degree levels • Commence construct for the self-evaluation process in preparation of the 2014 site visit

  10. Student Services Program Review at Santiago Canyon College

  11. SCC Cycle of Planning and Accreditation

  12. How Did We Get Here? SLO Assessment • Spring 2006: established a comprehensive timeline and framework for the development of SLOs within Student Services departments • 2007-08: implemented SLO assessment • Method to Measure and Timelines: Due early fall • SLO annual report due June 30th • To date, completed four full cycles of annual SLO assessment • Finalizing our Statement on Standards of Assessment Practice for Student Services Programs

  13. How Did We Get Here? Completed Triennial Program Review 2006-2009 • Program review template: 1) Signature Page, 2) Program Description, 3) Organizational Chart, 4) Student Learning Outcomes, 5) Data, 6) Data Analysis, 7) Findings and Future Direction • Spring 2010: “external reviewer” evaluate each program review using rubrics developed by student services leaders. Recommendations were made and forwarded to departments • Fall 2010: departments present their program review to Educational Master Planning Committee

  14. Where Are We Now? • Triennial Program Review Cycle for 2009-2012 • Revised the Program Review template • Executive Summary (approved by EMPC) • Summary of progress (since last PR) to include key accomplishments & challenges • Re-conceptualized the Data Analysis • Future Direction & Anticipated Challenges to include funding, personnel, facilities & technology

  15. Where Are We Going From Here? • Complete integration of all planning and budget processes • Creation of college budget committee • EMPC reports on Program Reviews to College Council • College updating its Educational Master Plan (EMP) • Develop and assess a transition plan for the new budget allocation model • Commence construct for the self-evaluation process in preparation of the 2014 site visit

More Related