1 / 33

Architectures and Applications for Wireless Sensor Networks (01204525) Network Architecture

Architectures and Applications for Wireless Sensor Networks (01204525) Network Architecture. Chaiporn Jaikaeo chaiporn.j@ku.ac.th Department of Computer Engineering Kasetsart University. Materials taken from lecture slides by Karl and Willig. Outline. Network scenarios Optimization goals

tia
Télécharger la présentation

Architectures and Applications for Wireless Sensor Networks (01204525) Network Architecture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Architectures and Applications for Wireless Sensor Networks (01204525)Network Architecture Chaiporn Jaikaeo chaiporn.j@ku.ac.th Department of Computer EngineeringKasetsart University Materials taken from lecture slides by Karl and Willig

  2. Outline • Network scenarios • Optimization goals • Design principles • Service interface • Gateway concepts

  3. Typical Views of WSN • Self-organizing mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) • Active networks • Peer-to-peer networks • Multi/mobile agent systems and swarm intellegence

  4. Source Source Sink Sink Sensor Network Scenarios • Sources: Any entity that provides data/measurements • Sinks: Nodes where information is required Source Internet Sink

  5. Sink Source Obstacle Single-Hop vs. Multi-hop • Multi-hop networks • Send packets to an intermediate node • Intermediate node forwards packet to its destination • Store-and-forward multi-hop network • Store & forward multi-hopping NOT the only possible solution • E.g., collaborative networking, network coding

  6. Multi-hopping Always Efficient? • Obvious idea: Multi-hopping is more energy-efficient than direct communication • Suppose we put a relay at distance d/2 • Energy for distance d is reduced from cd to 2c(d/2) • c - some constant •  - path loss coefficient ( 2) • Usually wrong, or over-simplified • Need to take constant offsets for powering transmitter, receiver into account

  7. Multiple Sinks, Multiple sources

  8. Different sources of mobility • Node mobility • Deliberately, self-propelled or by external force; targeted or at random • Happens in both WSN and MANET • Sink mobility • Sinks may be located outside WSN • E.g., mobile requester • Event mobility • In WSN, event that is to be observed moves around (or extends, shrinks)

  9. Sink Mobility Request Propagation of answers Movement direction

  10. WSN Event Mobility

  11. Outline • Network scenarios • Optimization goals • Design principles • Service interface • Gateway concepts

  12. Goal: Quality of Service • QoS in WSN is more complicated (compared to MANET) • Event detection/reporting probability • Event classification error, detection delay • Probability of missing a periodic report • Approximation accuracy (e.g, when WSN constructs a temperature map) • Tracking accuracy (e.g., difference between true and conjectured position of the pink elephant) • Related goal: robustness • Network should withstand failure of some nodes

  13. Goal: Energy efficiency • Many definitions • Energy per correctly received bit • Energy per reported (unique) event • Delay/energy tradeoffs • Network lifetime • Time to first node failure • Network half-life (how long until 50% of the nodes died?) • Time to partition • Time to loss of coverage • Time to failure of first event notification

  14. Sharpening the Drop • Sacrifice long lifetimes in return for an improvement in short lifetimes

  15. Goal: Scalability • Network should be operational regardless of number of nodes • At high efficiency • Typical node numbers difficult to guess • MANETs: 10s to 100s • WSNs: 10s to 1000s, maybe more • Requiring to scale to large node numbers has serious consequences for network architecture • Might not result in the most efficient solutions for small networks! • Carefully consider actual application needs before looking for scalable solutions

  16. Outline • Network scenarios • Optimization goals • Design principles • Service interface • Gateway concepts

  17. Distributed Organization • WSN participants should cooperate in organizing the network • Centralized approach usually not feasible • Potential shortcomings • Not clear whether distributed or centralized organization achieves better energy efficiency • Option: “limited centralized” solution • Elect nodes for local coordination/control • Perhaps rotate this function over time

  18. In-Network Processing • WSNs are expected to provide information • Gives additional options • E.g., manipulateor process the data in the network • Main example: aggregation • Apply aggregation functions to a collection tree in a network • Typical functions: minimum, maximum, average, sum, … • Not amenable functions: median

  19. 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 Aggregation Example

  20. Signal Processing • Another example of in-network processing • E.g., • Edge detection • Tracking/angle detection of signal source • Exploit temporaland spatial correlation • Observed signals might vary only slowly in time • Signals of neighboring nodes are often quite similar

  21. Adaptive Fidelity • Adapt data processing effort based on required accuracy/fidelity • E.g., event detection • When event occurs, increase rate of message exchanges • E.g., temperature • When temperature is in acceptable range, only send temperature values at low resolution • When temperature becomes high, increase resolution and thus message length

  22. Data Centric Networking • Interactions in typical networks are addressed to the identities of nodes • Known as node-centric or address-centric networking paradigm • In WSN, specific source of events might not be important • Several nodes can observe the same area • Focus on data/results instead Data-centric networking • Principal design change

  23. Implementation Options • Overlay networks & distributed hash tables (DHT) • Used in many peer-to-peer applications • Some disparities • Static key in DHT, dynamic changes in WSN • DHTs typically ignore issues like distance between nodes • Publish/subscribe • Nodes can publish data, can subscribe to any particular kind of data • Once data of a certain type has been published, it is delivered to all subscribers • Databases • SQL-based request

  24. Other Design Principles • Exploit location information • Exploit activity patterns • Exploit heterogeneity • By construction • By evolution • Cross-layer optimization of protocol stacks for WSN • Goes against grain of standard networking • Promises big performance gains

  25. Outline • Network scenarios • Optimization goals • Design principles • Service interface • Gateway concepts

  26. Interfaces to Protocol Stacks • The world’s all-purpose network interface: sockets • Good for transmitting data from one sender to one receiver • Not well matched to WSN needs (ok for ad hoc networks) App as another component Well-designed interface

  27. Expressibility Requirements • Support for simple request/response interactions • Support for asynchronous event notification • Different ways for identifying addressee of data • By location, by observed values, implicitly by some other form of group membership • By some semantically meaningful form – “room 123” • Easy accessibility of in-network processing functions • Allow to specify accuracy & timeliness requirements • Access node/network status information • Security, management functionality, … No clear standard has emerged yet – many competing, unclear proposals

  28. Outline • Network scenarios • Optimization goals • Design principles • Service interface • Gateway concepts

  29. Gateways in WSN/MANET • Allow remote access to/from the WSN • Bridge the gap between different interaction semantics • E.g., data vs. address-centric networking • Need support for different radios/protocols

  30. WSN to Internet Communication • E.g., deliver an alarm message to an Internet host • Issues • Need to find a gateway (integrates routing & service discovery) • Choose “best” gateway if several are available • How to find Alice or Alice’s IP?

  31. Remote requester Internet Gateway Gatewaynodes Internet to WSN communication • How to find the right WSN to answer a need? • How to translate from IP protocols to WSN protocols, semantics?

  32. Internet Gateway Gatewaynodes WSN tunneling • Use the Internet to “tunnel” WSN packets between two remote WSNs

  33. Summary • Network architectures for WSNs look quite different from typical networks in many aspects • Data-centric paradigm opens new possibilities for protocol design

More Related