1 / 21

ESP 179 Environmental Impact Analysis Professor Quinn

ESP 179 Environmental Impact Analysis Professor Quinn. Spring 2007 Tuesdays and Thursdays at 4:40 166 Chem. Course Formalities. Proposed revisions under review Name change to “Environmental Impact Analysis” Change from 3 to 4 credits

tiana
Télécharger la présentation

ESP 179 Environmental Impact Analysis Professor Quinn

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ESP 179Environmental Impact AnalysisProfessor Quinn Spring 2007 Tuesdays and Thursdays at 4:40 166 Chem

  2. Course Formalities • Proposed revisions under review • Name change to “Environmental Impact Analysis” • Change from 3 to 4 credits • Look for e-mail from Kim Mahoney on an accompanying ESP 198 course. • Environmental Science & Policy Dept. • 2134 Wickson Hall • ph.   530-752-7183 • kcmahoney@ucdavis.edu

  3. Teaching AssistantChristina Liang2120 Wicksonctliang@ucdavis.edu

  4. Discussion Sections • Wednesdays at 1:10, 4:10, and 5:10 • 1137 PES (GIS teaching lab) • Sections will cover material (especially environmental data sources) not covered in lecture • You may attend any section, but clear it with the TA • Participation and homework assignments will be 20% of the grade

  5. Grading • Midterm (20%) • Two on-line projects – one data, one policy analysis (20%) • Discussion and homework (20%) • Final -- June 12 (40%)

  6. Reading No textbook. We are going to try to use entirely on-line materials (including on-line journals at the library).

  7. e-mail Jim Quinn • jfquinn@ucdavis.edu Class list • esp179quinn-s07@ucdavis.edu (If you aren’t enrolled or don’t use your official UCD address, let me know.)

  8. Approach • This is intended to be a practical class • Less law, more science than in the past • Exposure to the major activities and professional responsibilities of (real) agency and consulting company analysts • Case studies

  9. Topics – The Legal Setting • The Big 4 national laws • Endangered Species Act (ESA) • Clean Air Act • Clean Water Act • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) • State and local laws – CEQA, CESA, etc. • Regulation vs. transparency and public comment

  10. The Policy Setting • Standing and accountability • Addressing uncertainty • Policy instruments • Case studies

  11. Formal Environmental Impact Analysis • NEPA and CEQA -- EIRs, EISs, Neg. Decs., and FONSIs • Stakeholders and public comments • Who makes the decision? (Who avoids the decision?) • Records of Decision • Mitigation, monitoring, and adaptive management • Equivalent procedures under many other authorities

  12. Identifying vulnerable resources – Public goods and social benefits • Rare and endangered species and habitats (NDDB, CWHR) • Watershed and water quality impacts (TMDLs, wetland impacts, drinking water safety) • Working landscapes – agriculture, forestry, fisheries, recreation • Cultural and archeological resources

  13. Living with Crummy Data • Agency responsibility for “Best Available Science” • Peer Review • Science Consistency Checks • Conceptual Models • Models -- Scenarios and extrapolations

  14. Identifying potential impacts • Transportation and urban expansion • Pollutants • Fires, floods, landslides, and earthquakes • Economic impacts

  15. Policy Instruments – How decisions are actually made • Multiple authorities may exist for a particular actions • Example – Protecting threatened salmon under the Clean Water Act • Example -- Water Pollution • Basin plans, impairment, and TMDLs • Interaction with CEQA • Stakeholder Negotiations • Watershed Plans

  16. Possible Case Studies • The Federal Highway Act, Blueprints, and sprawl in the San Joaquin Valley • The Sierra Nevada Framework • Disaster Assessment – Oil Spill Response and valuing fish • Pallid Sturgeon and the Missouri River • Chaparral and Fire in Southern California

  17. Take Home Messages

  18. Environmental protection, properly done, responds to consumer demand, creates economic benefits, promotes economic growth. • Clean air or a new DVD player? • Which creates more jobs? • Demand must be aggregated (Public Markets) • Private markets fail to maximize economic value to the public because of externalities

  19. Mechanisms for expressing public demand • Exactions • Top-down regulation • Typically based on perceived rights • Typically loosely connected to economic values • Political controls • Litigation over science • Transparency and negotiation • Often results in negotiations based on economic preferences • Political and economic controls • Litigation over process

  20. Market-like mechanisms • Transfer Payments • Examples • Central Valley water rights • Rice burning • Insurance-like mechanisms • Providing regulatory certainty • NCCPs, Safe Harbor agreements • Cap and trade • Successful markets require transparency!

  21. “CEQA is your friend” -- Steve Blum • Disclosure forces stakeholders and agencies to address uncertainty • Disclosure creates accountability • Conflict Resolution -- Disclosure may help shift arguments from rights-based to economics-based • economic arguments can often be solved without litigation • Good Science may even result in better policy

More Related