1.29k likes | 1.4k Vues
The International Association of Risk and Compliance Professionals (IARCP) highlights critical advancements in risk governance, following the Financial Stability Board's (FSB) thematic peer review. This review scrutinizes the responsibilities of boards and Chief Risk Officers (CROs) in fostering effective risk management frameworks. It emphasizes the role of independent assessments in strengthening internal controls, as well as latest insights on managing risks linked to foreign exchange transactions. Stay updated on the key news and stories influencing risk and compliance management this week.
E N D
P age |1 InternationalAssociationofRiskandCompliance Professionals(IARCP) 1200GStreetNWSuite800Washington, DC20005-6705USATel:202-449-9750www.risk-compliance-association.com Top10riskandcompliancemanagementrelatednewsstoriesandworldeventsthat(forbetterorforworse)shapedthe week'sagenda,andwhatisnext DearMember, TheFinancialStabilityBoard(FSB)publishedtodayathematicpeerreviewonriskgovernance. Riskgovernancecollectivelyreferstotheroleandresponsibilitiesoftheboard,thefirm-wideCROandriskmanagementfunction,andtheindependentassessmentoftheriskgovernanceframework. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |2 • Boardresponsibilitiesandpractices:Theboardisresponsibleforensuringthatthefirmhasanappropriateriskgovernanceframeworkgiventhefirm’sbusinessmodel,complexityandsizewhichisembeddedintothefirm’sriskculture. • Howboardsassumesuchresponsibilitiesvariesacrossjurisdictions. • Firm-wideriskmanagementfunction:TheCROandriskmanagementfunctionareresponsibleforthefirm’sriskmanagementacrosstheentireorganisation,ensuringthatthefirm’sriskprofileremainswithintheriskappetitestatement(RAS)asapprovedbytheboard. • Theriskmanagementfunctionisresponsibleforidentifying,measuring,monitoring,andrecommendingstrategiestocontrolormitigaterisks,andreportingonriskexposuresonanaggregatedand disaggregatedbasis. • Independentassessmentoftheriskgovernanceframework:Theindependentassessmentofthefirm’sriskgovernanceframework playsacrucialroleintheongoingmaintenanceofafirm’sinternalcontrols,riskmanagementandriskgovernance. • Ithelpsafirmaccomplishitsobjectivesbybringingadisciplinedapproachtoevaluateandimprovetheeffectivenessofriskmanagement,controlandgovernanceprocesses. • Thismayinvolveinternalparties,suchasinternalaudit,orexternalresourcessuchasthird-partyreviewers(e.g.,auditfirms,consultants). • Thisisanexcellentdocumentforriskmanagers.ReadmoreatNumber1ofourlist InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |3 Also… Ilikeit.Niceandclear: “Principalriskistheriskthatabankpaysawaythecurrencybeingsold,butfailstoreceivethecurrencybeingbought.Principalriskcanbethemostseriousriskbecausetheamountatriskcanbeequaltothefullvalueofthetrade. ReplacementcostriskistheriskthatanFXcounterpartywilldefaultbeforeatradehassettledandthatthebankmustreplaceitwithanewtradeandadifferentcounterpartyatcurrentmarketprices(potentiallylessfavourableexchangerate). Liquidityriskistheriskthatacounterpartywillnotsettleanobligationforfullvaluewhendue.Liquidityriskdoesnotimplythatacounterpartyisinsolventsinceitmaybeabletosettletherequireddebitobligationsatsomeunspecifiedlatertime.” Great,cleardefinitions,inthe“Supervisoryguidanceformanagingrisksassociatedwiththesettlementofforeignexchangetransactions”fromtheBankofInternationalSettlements. ReadmoreatNumber4belowWelcometotheTop10list. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |4 FSBpublishespeerreviewonriskgovernance TheFinancialStabilityBoard(FSB)publishedathematicpeerreviewon riskgovernance. Thereporttakesstockofriskgovernancepracticesatbothnational authoritiesandfirms,notesprogressmadesincethefinancialcrisis,identifiessoundpracticesandoffersrecommendationstosupportfurtherimprovements. GovernorDanielK.Tarullo Dodd-FrankAct BeforetheCommitteeonBanking,Housing,andUrbanAffairs,U.S.Senate,Washington,D.C. InterviewwithCarlosMontalvo,ExecutiveDirector ofEIOPA,conductedbyGarryBooth,Reactionsmagazine(theUK) CanyouexplainwhattheinterimSolvencyIImeasures,sometimesknownasSolvency1.5,encompass? InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |5 Supervisoryguidanceformanagingrisksassociatedwiththesettlementofforeignexchangetransactions Thepurposeofthisguidanceistoprovideupdatedguidancetosupervisorsandthebankstheysuperviseon approachestomanagingtherisksassociatedwiththesettlementofFX transactions. FinancialServicesSector DraftrecommendationstotheCharteredInstituteofInternalAuditors Followingthecrisisinthefinancialsystemoverthepastfewyearsawidespreadreviewofgovernanceinfinancialinstitutionshasbeentakingplace. ItwasinevitablethattheroleofInternalAuditwouldbebroughtintothatprocess. TheFinancialTransactionTax(FTT) On14February2013theEuropeanCommissionadoptedaproposalfora CouncilDirectiveimplementingenhancedcooperationintheareaof financialtransactiontax,whichmirrorsthescopeandobjectivesofitsoriginalFTTproposalofSeptember2011. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |6 SpeechbyAndrewBailey ManagingDirector,PrudentialBusinessUnitattheCharteredInstitute’sNicholasBarbonLectures,London SuitabilityofmembersoftheManagementBodyandKeyFunctionHolders EMIR:FrequentlyAskedQuestions Note:TheRegulation(EU)No648/2012oftheEuropeanParliamentandoftheCouncilof4July2012onOTCderivatives,centralcounterparties(CCPs)andtraderepositories(TRs)(EMIR)enteredintoforceon16August2012. However,manyprovisionsrequiretechnicalstandardstobedevelopedbyESMAandtheactualdateofapplicationoftheseprovisionswilldependonthedateofentryintoforceofthetechnicalstandards(seesectionontimingformoredetails) CorporateandRiskGovernance: TheIAIS’Self-AssessmentandPeerReviewonICPs4,5,7and8 TheIAIShaslaunchedtheSelf-AssessmentandPeerReview(SAPR)onCorporateandRiskGovernance. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |7 FSBpublishespeerreviewonriskgovernance TheFinancialStabilityBoard(FSB)publishedtodayathematicpeerreviewonriskgovernance. Thereporttakesstockofriskgovernancepracticesatbothnational authoritiesandfirms,notesprogressmadesincethefinancialcrisis,identifiessoundpracticesandoffersrecommendationstosupportfurtherimprovements. Therecentglobalfinancialcrisisexposedanumberofriskgovernanceweaknessesinmajorfinancialinstitutions,relatingtotherolesandresponsibilitiesofcorporateboardsofdirectors(the“board”),the firm-wideriskmanagementfunction,andtheindependentassessmentof riskgovernance. Withouttheappropriatechecksandbalancesprovidedbytheboardandthesefunctions,acultureofexcessiverisk-takingandleveragewasallowedtopermeateinmanyofthesefirms. Thepeerreviewfoundthat,sincethecrisis,nationalauthoritieshavetakenseveralmeasurestoimproveregulatoryandsupervisoryoversightofriskgovernanceatfinancialinstitutions. Thesemeasuresincludedevelopingorstrengtheningexistingregulationorguidance,raisingsupervisoryexpectationsfortheriskmanagementfunction,engagingmorefrequentlywiththeboardandmanagement,andassessingtheaccuracyandusefulnessoftheinformationprovidedtotheboardtoenableeffectivedischargeoftheirresponsibilities. Nonetheless,moreworkisnecessary. Inparticular,nationalauthoritiesneedtobetterassesstheeffectivenessofafirm’sriskgovernanceframework,andmorespecificallyitsriskculture, InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |8 tohelpensurethesoundmanagementofriskthroughtheeconomiccycle. Supervisorswillneedtostrengthentheirassessmentofriskgovernanceframeworkstoencompassanintegratedviewacrossallaspectsoftheframework. Thepeerreviewalsosurveyed36banksandbroker-dealersthatFSBmembersdeemedassignificantforthepurposeofthereview. Theevaluationoftheirresponsesindicatesthatmanyofthebestriskgovernancepracticesatsurveyedfirmsarenowmoreadvancedthannationalsupervisoryguidance,anoutcomethatmayhavebeenmotivatedbyfirms’needtoregainmarketconfidence. Despitetheseconsiderablestrides,significantgapsremaininanumberofareas,particularlyintheriskmanagementfunction. Atthecoreofstrongriskmanagementisaneffectiveriskappetiteframework,andfirms’progresstodateisuneveninitsdevelopment,comprehensivenessandimplementation. Veryfewfirmswereabletoidentifyclearexamplesofhowtheyusedtheir riskappetiteframeworkinstrategicdecision-makingprocesses. Drawingfromthefindingsofthereview,thereportidentifiesalistofsoundriskgovernancepracticesthatwouldhelpfirmscontinuetoimprovetheirriskgovernanceandnationalauthoritiestoassessitseffectiveness. Thereviewalsosetsoutseveralrecommendationstargetingareaswheremoresubstantialworkisneeded,inparticular: 1.Nationalauthoritiesshouldstrengthentheirregulatoryandsupervisoryguidanceforfinancialinstitutionsanddevoteadequateresourcestoassesstheeffectivenessofriskgovernanceframeworks. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |9 Standardsettingbodiesshouldreviewtheirprinciplesforgovernance,takingintoconsiderationthesoundriskgovernancepracticessetoutinthereport. TheFSBshouldexplorewaystoformallyassessriskcultureatfinancialinstitutions. TheFSBshouldprovidegeneralguidanceonthekeyelementsthatshouldbeincludedinriskappetiteframeworksandestablishacommonnomenclaturefortermsusedinriskappetitestatements. TiffMacklem,ChairmanoftheFSB’sStandingCommitteeonStandardsImplementation(SCSI),said: “Thereviewusefullypullstogethergoodriskgovernancepracticesandidentifiesfollow-upworkthatneedstobedonebynationalauthoritiestostrengthentheirabilitytoassesstheeffectivenessoffirms’riskgovernanceframeworks. Recentheadlineeventssurroundingactivitiesatsomelargefinancialinstitutionsunderscoretheimportanceofpromotingandimplementingasoundriskculture.” SweeLianTeo,Chairofthepeerreviewteamonriskgovernance,said:“Whilemeasureshavebeentakentoimproveriskgovernance,thereview showedthattherearestillgapsthatneedtobeaddressedbybothfirmsandsupervisors. Thereportsetsoutrecommendationsthatwillhelpsupervisorseverywhereraisethebarontheirexpectationsforriskgovernancesothatfirms’practicescontinuetoimprovethroughchangingenvironments.” Notes TheFSBhasbeenestablishedtocoordinateattheinternationalleveltheworkofnationalfinancialauthoritiesandinternationalstandardsettingbodiesandtodevelopandpromotetheimplementationofeffective InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |10 regulatory,supervisoryandotherfinancialsectorpoliciesintheinterestoffinancialstability. Itbringstogethernationalauthoritiesresponsibleforfinancialstabilityin24countriesandjurisdictions,internationalfinancialinstitutions, sector-specificinternationalgroupingsofregulatorsandsupervisors,and committeesofcentralbankexperts. TheFSBalsoconductsoutreachwith65otherjurisdictionsthroughitssixregionalconsultativegroups. ThepeerreviewonriskgovernanceisthethesixththematicpeerreviewconductedbytheFSBandthefirstthematicreviewusingtherevisedobjectivesandguidelinesfortheconductofpeerreviewssetforthintheDecember2011HandbookforFSBPeerReviews. ThematicreviewsfocusontheimplementationandeffectivenessacrosstheFSBmembershipofinternationalfinancialstandardsdevelopedbystandard-settingbodiesandpoliciesagreedwithintheFSBinaparticularareaimportantforglobalfinancialstability. Thematicreviewsmayalsoanalyseotherareasimportantforglobalfinancialstabilitywhereinternationalstandardsorpoliciesdonotyetexist. Theobjectivesofthereviewsaretoencourageconsistentcross-countryandcross-sectorimplementation;toevaluate(wherepossible)theextent towhichstandardsandpolicieshavehadtheirintendedresults;andtoidentifygapsandweaknessesinreviewedareasandtomakerecommendationsforpotentialfollow-up(includingviathedevelopmentofnewstandards)byFSBmembers. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |11 ThematicReviewonRiskGovernancePeerReviewReport Foreword FinancialStabilityBoard(FSB)memberjurisdictionshavecommitted,undertheFSBCharterandintheFSBFrameworkforStrengthening AdherencetoInternationalStandards,toundergoperiodicpeerreviews. Tofulfilthisresponsibility,theFSBhasestablishedaregularprogramme ofcountryandthematicpeerreviewsofitsmemberjurisdictions. ThematicreviewsfocusontheimplementationandeffectivenessacrosstheFSBmembershipofinternationalfinancialstandardsdevelopedbystandard-settingbodiesandpoliciesagreedwithintheFSBinaparticularareaimportantforglobalfinancialstability. Thematicreviewsmayalsoanalyseotherareasimportantforglobalfinancialstabilitywhereinternationalstandardsorpoliciesdonotyetexist. Theobjectivesofthereviewsaretoencourageconsistentcross-countryandcross-sectorimplementation;toevaluate(wherepossible)theextent towhichstandardsandpolicieshavehadtheirintendedresults;andtoidentifygapsandweaknessesinreviewedareasandtomakerecommendationsforpotentialfollow-up(includingviathedevelopmentofnewstandards)byFSBmembers. Thisreportdescribesthefindingsofthethematicpeerreviewonriskgovernance,includingthekeyelementsofthediscussionintheFSBStandingCommitteeonStandardsImplementation(SCSI). Executivesummary Therecentglobalfinancialcrisisexposedanumberofgovernanceweaknessesthatresultedinfirms’failuretounderstandtheriskstheyweretaking. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |12 Inthewakeofthecrisis,numerousreportspaintedafairlybleakpictureofriskgovernanceframeworksatfinancialinstitutions,whichconsistsofthethreekeyfunctions:theboard,thefirm-wideriskmanagementfunction,andtheindependentassessmentofriskgovernance. Thecrisishighlightedthatmanyboardshaddirectorswithlittlefinancialindustryexperienceandlimitedunderstandingoftherapidlyincreasingcomplexityoftheinstitutionstheywereleading. Toooften,directorswereunabletodedicatesufficienttimetounderstandthefirm’sbusinessmodelandtoodeferentialtoseniormanagement. Inaddition,manyboardsdidnotpaysufficientattentiontoriskmanagementorsetupeffectivestructures,suchasadedicatedriskcommittee,tofacilitatemeaningfulanalysisofthefirm’sriskexposuresandtoconstructivelychallengemanagement’sproposalsanddecisions. Theriskcommitteesthatdidexistwereoftenstaffedbydirectorsshorton bothexperienceandindependencefrommanagement. Theinformationprovidedtotheboardwasvoluminousandnoteasilyunderstoodwhichhamperedtheabilityofdirectorstofulfiltheirresponsibilities. Moreover,mostfirmslackedaformalprocesstoindependentlyassesstheproprietyoftheirriskgovernanceframeworks. Withouttheappropriatechecksandbalancesprovidedbytheboard,theriskmanagementfunction,andindependentassessmentfunctions,acultureofexcessiverisk-takingandleveragewasallowedtopermeatein theseweaklygovernedfirms. Further,withtheriskmanagementfunctionlackingtheauthority,statureandindependencetoreininthefirm’srisk-taking,theabilitytoaddressanyweaknessesinriskgovernanceidentifiedbyinternalcontrolassessmentandtestingprocesseswasobstructed. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |13 Thepeerreviewfoundthat,sincethecrisis,nationalauthoritieshavetakenseveralmeasurestoimproveregulatoryandsupervisoryoversightofriskgovernanceatfinancialinstitutions. Thesemeasuresincludedevelopingorstrengtheningexistingregulationorguidance,raisingsupervisoryexpectationsfortheriskmanagementfunction,engagingmorefrequentlywiththeboardandmanagement,andassessingtheaccuracyandusefulnessoftheinformationprovidedtotheboardtoenableeffectivedischargeoftheirresponsibilities. Nonetheless,moreworkremains;nationalauthoritiesneedtostrengthentheirabilitytoassesstheeffectivenessofafirm’sriskgovernance,andmorespecificallyitsriskculturetohelpensuresoundriskgovernancethroughchangingenvironments. Supervisorswillneedtoundergoasubstantialchangeinapproachsinceassessingriskgovernanceframeworksentailsforminganintegratedviewacrossallaspectsoftheframework. Thepeerreviewalsoaskedsupervisorstoevaluateprogressmadebytheirsurveyedfirm(s)towardenhancedriskgovernanceinsevenareas. Toprovidesomeconsistencytothisexercise,thereviewteamdevelopedhigh-levelcriteriatoassistsupervisoryevaluationsoffirms’progress,drawingfromacompilationofrelevantprinciples,recommendationsandsupervisoryguidance. Thehigh-levelcriteriawereviewedasfundamentalprerequisitesforriskgovernanceframeworks. Thisevaluationfoundthatmanyofthebestriskgovernancepracticesatsurveyedfirmsarenowmoreadvancedthannationalguidance. Thisoutcomemayhavebeenmotivatedbyfirms’needtoregainmarketconfidenceratherthanregulatoryrequirements. Firmshavemadeparticularprogressin: InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |14 • assessingthecollectiveskillsandqualificationsoftheboardaswellastheboard’seffectivenesseitherthroughself-evaluationsorthroughtheuseofthirdparties; • institutingastand-aloneriskcommitteethatiscomposedonlyofindependentdirectorsandhavingacleardefinitionofindependence; • establishingagroup-widechiefriskofficer(CRO)andriskmanagementfunctionthatisindependentfromrevenue-generatingresponsibilitiesandhasthestature,authorityandindependencetochallengedecisionsonriskmadebymanagementandbusinesslines;and • integratingthediscussionsamongtheriskandauditcommitteesthroughjointmeetingsorcross-membership. • Althoughmanysurveyedfirmshavemadeprogressinthelastfewyears,significantgapsremain,relativetothecriteriadeveloped,particularlyinriskmanagement. • Therewerealsodifferencesinprogressacrossregionswithfirmsinadvancedeconomieshavingadoptedmoreofthedesirableriskgovernancepractices. • Theresultsofthesupervisoryevaluationsweregroupedby: • allsurveyedfirms; • firmsidentifiedbytheFSBandBaselCommitteeonBankingSupervision(BCBS)asglobalsystemicallyimportantfinancialinstitutions,orG-SIFIs;and • firmsthatresideinadvancedeconomies(AEs)oremergingmarket anddevelopingeconomies(EMDEs). • Insummary,acrossthesevenareasevaluated,firmshavemadethemostprogressindefiningtheboard’sroleandresponsibilities,andreasonableprogressintheirapproachtoriskgovernanceandtheindependentassessmentofriskgovernance. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |15 • Thesupervisoryevaluations,however,indicatethatsurveyedfirmsshouldcontinuetoworktowarddefiningtheresponsibilitiesoftheriskcommitteeandstrengtheningtheirriskmanagementfunctionsasnearly 50percentofsurveyedfirmsdidnotmeetalloftheevaluationcriteriain theseareas. • Bytypeofinstitution,surveyedG-SIFIsaremoreadvancedthanotherfinancialinstitutionsindefiningtheresponsibilitiesoftheboardandriskcommittee,conductingindependentassessmentsofriskgovernance,providingrelevantinformationtotheboardandriskcommittee,andtosomeextentmoreadvancedintheriskmanagementfunction. • Theseresultssupportthefindingthatthefirmsintheregionshardesthitbythefinancialcrisishavemadethemostprogress. • Meanwhile,supervisoryevaluationsoffirmsthatresideinEMDEsshowthatnearly65percentdidnotmeetallofthecriteriafortheriskmanagementfunction. • Thesegapsneedimmediateattentionbybothsupervisorsandfirms.Othersignificantfindingscomingoutofthereviewincludethefollowing: • Nationalauthoritiesdonotengageonasufficientlyregularandfrequentbasiswiththeboard,riskcommitteeandauditcommittee.Severaljurisdictionsholdsuchmeetingsonlyonceayearoronanas-needed basis. • GoodprogresshasbeenmadetowardelevatingtheCRO’sstature,authority,andindependence. • Inmanyfirms,theCROhasadirectreportinglinetothechiefexecutiveofficer(CEO)andarolethatisdistinctfromotherexecutivefunctionsandbusinesslineresponsibilities(e.g.,no“dual-hatting”). • Thiselevation,however,needstobesupportedbytheinvolvementoftheriskcommitteeinreviewingtheperformanceandsettingtheobjectivesoftheCRO,ensuringthattheCROhasaccesstotheboardandrisk InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |16 • committeewithoutimpediment(includingreportingdirectlytotheboard/riskcommittee),andfacilitatingperiodicmeetingswithdirectorswithoutthepresenceofexecutivedirectorsorothermanagement. • Moreworkisneededonthepartofbothnationalauthoritiesandfirmsonestablishinganeffectiveriskappetiteframework(RAF).Assessingafirm’sRAFisachallengingtaskthatrequiresgreaterclarityandanelevatedlevelofconsistencyamongnationalauthorities. • Supervisoryexpectationsfortheindependentassessmentofinternalcontrolsystemsbyinternalauditorotherindependentfunctionwerewell-establishedpriortothecrisis. • Assuch,thisisanareathatdemonstratedrelativelysoundpracticesacrosstheFSBmembershipatbothnationalauthoritiesandfirms. • However,nojurisdictionhadspecificexpectationsforinternalaudittoperiodicallyprovideafirm-wideassessmentofriskmanagementorriskgovernanceprocesses. • Nearlyallfirmshaveanindependentchiefauditexecutive(CAE)whoreportsadministrativelytotheCEOandtheauditcommitteechairandwhodirectlyreportsauditfindingstoapermanentauditcommittee. • However,thereisstillroomforimprovingtheCAE’saccesstodirectorsbeyondthoseontheauditcommittee. • Drawingfromthefindingsofthereview,includingdiscussionswithindustryorganisationsaswellasriskcommitteedirectorsandCROsofseveralfirmsthatparticipatedinthereview,thereportidentifiessomeofthebetterpracticesexemplifiedbynationalauthoritiesandfirmstocollectivelyformalistofsoundriskgovernancepractices(seeSectionV). • Italsodrawsonsomeoftherelevantprinciplesandrecommendationsforriskgovernancepublishedbyotherorganisationsandstandardsettingbodies. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |17 • Noonesingleauthorityorfirm,however,demonstratedallofthesesound practices. • Thisintegratedandcoherentlistofsoundpracticesaimstohelpnational authoritiestakeamoreholisticapproachtoriskgovernance,ratherthanlookingateachfacetinisolation,andmayprovideabasisfor considerationbyauthoritiesandstandardsettingbodiesastheyreviewtheirguidanceandstandardsforstrengtheningriskgovernancepractices. • Thereviewsetsoutseveralrecommendationstoensuretheeffectivenessofriskgovernanceframeworkscontinuetoimprovebytargetingareaswheremoresubstantialworkisneeded. • Whilethereviewfocusedonbanksandbroker-dealersthataresystemicallyimportant,theserecommendationsapplytoothertypesoffinancialinstitutions,includinginsurersandfinancialconglomerates. • Recommendations: • Toensurethatfirms’riskgovernancepracticescontinuetoimprove,FSBmemberjurisdictionsshouldstrengthentheirregulatoryandsupervisoryguidanceforfinancialinstitutions,inparticularforSIFIs,and devoteadequateresources(bothinskillsandquantity)toassesstheeffectivenessofriskgovernanceframeworks. • Inparticular,nationalauthoritiesshouldconsiderthefollowingsoundriskgovernancepractices: • Setrequirementsontheindependenceandcompositionofboards,includingrequirementsonrelevanttypesofskillsthattheboard,collectively,shouldhave(e.g.,riskmanagement,financialindustryexpertise)aswellasthetimecommitmentexpected. • Holdtheboardaccountableforitsoversightofthefirm’sriskgovernanceandassessifthelevelandtypesofriskinformationprovidedtotheboardenableeffectivedischargeofboardresponsibilities. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |18 Boardsshouldsatisfythemselvesthattheinformationtheyreceivefrommanagementandthecontrolfunctionsiscomprehensive,accurate,completeandtimelytoenableeffectivedecision-makingonthefirm’sstrategy,riskprofileandemergingrisks. Thisincludesestablishingcommunicationproceduresbetweentheriskcommitteeandtheboardandacrossotherboardcommittees,mostimportantlytheauditandfinancecommittees. SetrequirementstoelevatetheCRO’sstature,authority,andindependenceinthefirm. ThisincludesrequiringtheriskcommitteetoreviewtheperformanceandobjectivesoftheCRO,ensuringtheCROhasunfetteredaccesstotheboardandriskcommittee(includingadirectreportinglinetotheboardand/orriskcommittee),andexpectingtheCROtomeetperiodicallywithdirectorswithoutexecutivedirectorsandmanagementpresent. TheCROshouldhaveadirectreportinglinetotheCEOandadistinct rolefromotherexecutivefunctionsandbusinesslineresponsibilities(e.g.,no“dual-hatting”). Further,theCROshouldbeinvolvedinactivitiesanddecisions(fromariskperspective)thatmayaffectthefirm’sprospectiveriskprofile(e.g.,strategicbusinessplans,newproducts,mergersandacquisitions,internalcapitaladequacyassessmentprocess,orICAAP). Requiretheboard(orauditcommittee)toobtainanindependentassessmentofthedesignandeffectivenessoftheriskgovernanceframeworkonanannualbasis. Engagemorefrequentlywiththeboard,riskcommittee,auditcommittee,CEO,CRO,andotherrelevantfunctions,suchastheCFO,toassessthefirm’sriskculture(e.g.,the“toneatthetop”),whetherdirectorsprovideeffectivechallengetomanagement’sproposalsanddecisions,andwhethertheriskmanagementfunctionhastheappropriateauthoritytoinfluencedecisionsthataffectthefirm’sriskexposures. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |19 Therelevantstandardsettingbodies(e.g.,BCBS,IAIS,IOSCO,OECD)shouldreviewtheirprinciplesforgovernance,takingintoconsiderationthesoundriskgovernancepracticeslistedinSectionV. Riskcultureplaysacriticalroleinensuringeffectiveriskgovernanceenduresthroughchangingenvironments. TheFSBSupervisoryIntensityandEffectivenessgrouphasagreedtoimplementtherecommendationfromthe2012FSBprogressreportonenhancedsupervisiontoexplorewaystoformallyassessriskculture,particularlyatG-SIFIs. ThisworkshouldbecompletedbySeptember2013. Toimprovetheirabilitytoassessfirms’progresstowardmoreeffectiveriskmanagement,nationalauthoritiesshouldprovideguidanceonthekeyelementsthatareincorporatedineffectiveriskappetiteframeworks. Toenablefirmstodefineframeworkswithaminimumamountofcomparabilitydespitetheirfirm-specificnature,acommonnomenclaturefortermsusedinriskappetitestatements(e.g.,“riskappetite”,“riskcapacity”,“risklimits”)shouldbeestablished. TheFSBSupervisoryIntensityandEffectivenessgroup,incollaborationwithrelevantstandardsetters,hasagreedtofinalisethisworkbytheendof2013. TheFSBshouldconsiderlaunchingafollow-upreviewonriskgovernanceafter2016(i.e.,aftertheG-SIFIpolicymeasuresbegintobephasedin),toassessnationalauthorities’implementationoftherecommendationstostrengthentheirsupervisoryguidanceandoversightofriskgovernance. ThereviewalsoshouldincludetheG-SIFIsidentifiedin2014bytheFSBincollaborationwiththeBCBSandIAIS. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |20 (ImportantPart) IncreasingtheintensityandeffectivenessofsupervisiontoreducethemoralhazardposedbySIFIsisakeycomponentoftheFSB’spolicymeasures,endorsedbyG20Leaders. Sincetheonsetoftheglobalcrisis,supervisorshaveintensifiedtheiroversightoffinancialinstitutions,particularlySIFIs,soastoreducetheprobabilityoftheirfailure. Specifically,supervisoryexpectationsofriskmanagementfunctionsandoverallriskgovernanceframeworkshaveincreased,asthiswasanareathatexhibitedsignificantweaknessesinmanyfinancialinstitutionsduringtheglobalfinancialcrisis. Whilesupervisorsareresponsibleforassessingwhetherafirm’sriskgovernanceframeworkandprocessesareadequate,appropriateandeffectiveformanagingthefirm’sriskprofile,thefirm’smanagementisresponsibleforidentifyingandmanagingthefirm’srisk. InOctober2011,theFSBagreedtoconductathematicpeerreviewonriskgovernancetoassessprogresstowardenhancingpracticesatnational authoritiesandfirms(banksandbroker-dealers). Forpurposesofthisreview,riskgovernancecollectivelyreferstotheroleandresponsibilitiesoftheboard,thefirm-wideCROandriskmanagementfunction,andtheindependentassessmentoftheriskgovernanceframework(seeChart2). InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |21 • Boardresponsibilitiesandpractices:Theboardisresponsibleforensuringthatthefirmhasanappropriateriskgovernanceframeworkgiventhefirm’sbusinessmodel,complexityandsizewhichisembeddedintothefirm’sriskculture. • Howboardsassumesuchresponsibilitiesvariesacrossjurisdictions. • Firm-wideriskmanagementfunction:TheCROandriskmanagementfunctionareresponsibleforthefirm’sriskmanagementacrosstheentireorganisation,ensuringthatthefirm’sriskprofileremainswithintheriskappetitestatement(RAS)asapprovedbytheboard. • Theriskmanagementfunctionisresponsibleforidentifying,measuring,monitoring,andrecommendingstrategiestocontrolormitigaterisks,andreportingonriskexposuresonanaggregatedand disaggregatedbasis. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |22 -Independentassessmentoftheriskgovernanceframework:Theindependentassessmentofthefirm’sriskgovernanceframework playsacrucialroleintheongoingmaintenanceofafirm’sinternalcontrols,riskmanagementandriskgovernance. Ithelpsafirmaccomplishitsobjectivesbybringingadisciplinedapproachtoevaluateandimprovetheeffectivenessofriskmanagement,controlandgovernanceprocesses. Thismayinvolveinternalparties,suchasinternalaudit,orexternalresourcessuchasthird-partyreviewers(e.g.,auditfirms,consultants). InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |23 GovernorDanielK.Tarullo Dodd-FrankAct BeforetheCommitteeonBanking,Housing,andUrbanAffairs,U.S.Senate,Washington,D.C. ChairmanJohnson,RankingMemberCrapo,andothermembersofthecommittee,thankyoufor theopportunitytotestifyonimplementationoftheDodd-FrankWall StreetReformandConsumerProtectionActof2010(Dodd-FrankAct). Intoday'stestimony,IwillprovideanupdateontheFederalReserve'srecent activitiespertinenttotheDodd-FrankActanddescribeourregulatoryandsupervisoryprioritiesfor2013. TheFederalReserve,inmanycasesjointlywithotherregulatoryagencies,hasmadesteadyandconsiderable progressinimplementingtheCongressionalmandatesintheDodd-FrankAct,thoughobviouslysomeworkremains. Throughoutthiseffort,theFederalReservehasmaintainedafocuson financialstability. Intheprocessofruledevelopment,wehaveplacedparticularemphasisonmitigatingsystemicrisks. Thus,amongotherthings,wehaveproposedvaryingtheapplicationoftheDodd-FrankAct'sspecialprudentialrulesbasedontherelativesizeandcomplexityofregulatedfinancialfirms. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |24 Thisfocusonsystemicriskisalsoreflectedinourincreasinglysystematicsupervisionofthelargestbankingfirms. RecentRegulatoryReformMilestones Strongbankcapitalrequirements,whilenotalonesufficienttoguaranteethesafetyandsoundnessofourbankingsystem,arecentraltopromotingtheresiliencyofbankingfirmsandthefinancialsectorasawhole. Capitalprovidesacushiontoabsorbafirm'sexpectedandunexpectedlosses,helpingtoensurethatthoselossesarebornebyshareholdersratherthantaxpayers. Thefinancialcrisisrevealed,however,thattheregulatorycapitalrequirementsforbankingfirmswerenotsufficientlyrobust. Italsoconfirmedthatnosinglecapitalmeasureadequatelycapturesabankingfirm'srisksofcreditandtradinglosses. Agoodbitofprogresshasnowbeenmadeinstrengtheningandupdatingtraditionalcapitalrequirements,aswellasdevisingsomecomplementarymeasuresforlargerfirms. Asyouknow,inDecember2010theBaselCommitteeonBankingSupervision(BaselCommittee)issuedtheBaselIIIpackageofreformstoitsframeworkforminimumcapitalrequirements,supplementinganearliersetofchangesthatincreasedrequirementsforimportantclassesoftradedassets. Lastsummer,theFederalReserve,theOfficeoftheComptrolleroftheCurrency(OCC),andtheFederalDepositInsuranceCorporation(FDIC)issuedforcommentasetofproposalstoimplementtheBaselIIIcapitalstandardsforalllarge,internationallyactiveU.S.bankingfirms. Inaddition,theproposalswouldapplyrisk-basedandleveragecapitalrequirementstosavingsandloanholdingcompaniesforthefirsttime. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |25 TheproposalsalsowouldmodernizeandharmonizetheexistingregulatorycapitalstandardsforallU.S.bankingfirms,whichhavenotbeencomprehensivelyupdatedsincetheirintroductiontwenty-fiveyearsago,andincorporatecertainnewlegislativeprovisions,including elementsofsections171and939AoftheDodd-FrankAct. TohelpensurethatallU.S.bankingfirmsmaintainstrongcapitalpositions,theBaselIIIproposalswouldintroduceanewcommonequitycapitalrequirement,raisetheexistingtier1capitalminimumrequirement,implementacapitalconservationbufferontopoftheregulatoryminimums,andintroduceamorerisk-sensitivestandardizedapproachforcalculatingrisk-weightedassets. Large,internationallyactivebankingfirmsalsowouldbesubjecttoasupplementaryleverageratioandacountercyclicalcapitalbufferandwouldfacehighercapitalrequirementsforderivativesandcertainothercapitalmarketsexposurestheyhold. Takentogether,theseproposalsshouldmateriallyreducetheprobabilityoffailureofU.S.bankingfirms--particularlytheprobabilityoffailureofthelargest,mostcomplexU.S.bankingfirms. InOctober2012,theFederalReservefinalizedrulesimplementingstresstestingrequirementsundersection165oftheDodd-FrankAct. Consistentwiththestatute,therulesrequireannualsupervisorystresstestsforbankholdingcompanieswith$50billionormoreinassetsandanynonbankfinancialcompaniesdesignatedbytheFinancialStabilityOversightCouncil(Council). Therulesalsorequirecompany-runstresstestsforabroadersetof regulatedfinancialfirmsthathave$10billionormoreinassets. ThenewDodd-FrankActsupervisorystresstestrequirementsaregenerallyconsistentwiththestressteststhattheFederalReservehasbeenconductingonthelargestU.S.bankholdingcompaniessincetheSupervisoryCapitalAssessmentPrograminthespringof2009. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |26 ThestresstestsallowsupervisorstoassesswhetherfirmshaveenoughcapitaltoweatherasevereeconomicdownturnandcontributetotheFederalReserve'sabilitytomakeassessmentsoftheresilienceoftheU.S.bankingsystemunderadverseeconomicscenarios. Thestresstestsareanintegralpartofourcapitalplanrequirement,which providesastructuredwaytomakehorizontalevaluationsofthecapitalplanningabilitiesoflargebankingfirms. TheFederalReservealsoissuedinDecemberoflastyearaproposaltoimplementenhancedprudentialstandardsandearlyremediationrequirementsforforeignbanksundersections165and166ofthe Dodd-FrankAct. TheproposalisgenerallyconsistentwiththesetofstandardspreviouslyproposedforlargeU.S.bankholdingcompanies. TheproposalgenerallywouldrequireforeignbankswithalargeU.S.presencetoorganizetheirU.S.subsidiariesunderasingleintermediateholdingcompanythatwouldserveasaplatformforconsistentsupervisionandregulation. TheU.S.intermediateholdingcompaniesofforeignbankswouldbesubjecttothesamerisk-basedcapitalandleveragerequirementsasU.S.bankholdingcompanies. Inaddition,U.S.intermediateholdingcompaniesandtheU.S.branchesandagenciesofforeignbankswithalargeU.S.presencewouldberequiredtomeetliquidityrequirementssimilartothoseapplicabletolargeU.S.bankholdingcompanies. Theproposalsrespondtofundamentalchangesinthescopeandscaleof foreignbankactivitiesintheUnitedStatesinthelastfifteenyears. TheywouldincreasetheresiliencyandresolvabilityoftheU.S.operationsofforeignbanks,helpprotectU.S.financialstability,andpromotecompetitiveequityforalllargebankingfirmsoperatingintheUnitedStates. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |27 ThecommentperiodforthisproposalclosesattheendofMarch. Prioritiesfor2013 TheFederalReserve'ssupervisoryandregulatoryprogramin2013willconcentrateonfourtasks: ContinuingkeyDodd-FrankActandBaselIIIregulatoryimplementationwork; Furtherdevelopingsystematicsupervisionoflargebankingfirms; Improvingtheresolvabilityoflargebankingfirms;and Reducingsystemicriskintheshadowbankingsystem. CarryingForwardtheKeyDodd-FrankActandBaselIIIRegulatoryImplementationWork Capital,Liquidity,andOtherPrudentialRequirementsforLargeBankingFirms. Giventhecentralityofstrongcapitalstandards,atopprioritythisyearwillbetoupdatethebankregulatorycapitalframeworkwithafinalruleimplementingBaselIIIandtheupdatedrulesforstandardized risk-weightedcapitalrequirements. Thebankingagencieshavereceivedmorethan2,000commentsontheBaselIIIcapitalproposal. Manyofthecommentshavebeendirectedatcertainfeaturesoftheproposedruleconsideredespeciallytroublingbycommunityandsmallerregionalbanks,suchasthenewstandardizedriskweightsformortgagesandthetreatmentofunrealizedgainsandlossesoncertaindebtsecurities. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |28 Thesecriticismsunderscorethedifficultyinfashioningstandardizedrequirementsapplicabletoallbanksthatbalancerisksensitivitywiththeneedtoavoidexcessivecomplexity. Here,though,Ithinkthereisawidespreadviewthattheproposedruleerredonthesideoftoomuchcomplexity. Thethreebankingagenciesarecarefullyconsideringtheseandallcommentsreceivedontheproposalandhopetofinalizetherulemakingthisspring. TheFederalReservealsointendstoworkthisyeartowardfinalizationofitsproposalstoimplementtheenhancedprudentialstandardsandearlyremediationrequirementsforlargebankingfirmsundersections165and166oftheDodd-FrankAct. Aspartofthisprocess,weintendtoconductshortlyaquantitativeimpactstudyofthesingle-counterpartycreditlimitselementoftheproposal. Oncefinalized,thesecomprehensivestandardswillrepresentacorepartofthenewregulatoryframeworkthatmitigatesrisksposedbysystemicallyimportantfinancialfirmsandoffsetsanybenefitsthatthesefirmsmaygainfrombeingperceivedas"toobigtofail." Wealsoanticipateissuingnoticesofsomeimportantproposedrulemakingsthisyear. TheFederalReservewillbeworkingtoproposearisk-basedcapitalsurchargeapplicabletosystemicallyimportantbankingfirms. ThisrulemakingwillimplementforU.S.firmstheapproachtoasystemicsurchargedevelopedbytheBaselCommittee,whichvariesinmagnitudebasedonthemeasureofeachfirm'ssystemicfootprint. FollowingthepassageoftheDodd-FrankAct,whichcalledforenhancedcapitalstandardsforsystemicallyimportantfirms,theFederalReservejoinedwithsomeotherkeyregulatorsfromaroundtheworldin InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |29 successfullyurgingtheBaselCommitteetoadoptarequirementofthissortforallfirmsofglobalsystemicimportance. AnotherproposedrulemakingwillcoverimplementationbythethreefederalbankingagenciesoftherecentlycompletedBaselIIIquantitativeliquidityrequirementsforlargeglobalbanks. Thefinancialcrisisexposeddefectsintheliquidityriskmanagementoflargefinancialfirms,especiallythosewhichreliedheavilyonshort-termwholesalefunding. Thesenewrequirementsincludetheliquiditycoverageratio(LCR),whichisdesignedtoensurethatafirmhasasufficientamountofhighqualityliquidassetstowithstandaseverestandardizedliquidityshockovera30-dayperiod. TheFederalReserveexpectsthattheU.S.bankingagencieswillissueaproposalin2013toimplementtheLCRforlargeU.S.bankingfirms. TheBaselIIIliquiditystandardsshouldmateriallyimprovetheliquidityriskprofilesofinternationallyactivebanksandwillserveasakeyelementoftheenhancedliquiditystandardsrequiredundertheDodd-FrankAct. VolckerRule,SwapsPush-out,andRiskRetention. Section619oftheDodd-FrankAct,knownasthe"Volckerrule,"generallyprohibitsabankingentityfromengaginginproprietarytradingoracquiringanownershipinterestin,sponsoring,orhavingcertainrelationshipswithahedgefundorprivateequityfund. InOctober2011,thefederalbankingagenciesandtheSecuritiesandExchangeCommissionsoughtpubliccommentonaproposaltoimplementtheVolckerrule. TheCommodityFuturesTradingCommissionsubsequentlyissuedasubstantiallysimilarproposal. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |30 Therulemakingagencieshavespentthepastyearcarefullyanalyzingthenearly19,000publiccommentsontheproposalandhavemadesignificantprogressincraftingafinalrulethatisfaithfultothelanguageofthestatuteandmaximizesbanksafetyandsoundnessandfinancialstabilityattheleastcosttotheliquidityofthefinancialmarkets,creditavailability,andeconomicgrowth. Section716oftheDodd-FrankActgenerallyprohibitstheprovisionof federalassistance,suchasFDICdepositinsuranceorFederalReservediscountwindowcredit,toswapdealersandmajorswapparticipants. TheFederalReserveiscurrentlyworkingwiththeOCCandtheFDICtodevelopaproposedrulethatwouldprovideclarityonhowandwhenthesection716requirementswouldapplytoU.S.insureddepositoryinstitutionsandtheiraffiliatesandtoU.S.branchesofforeignbanks. Weexpecttoissueguidanceontheimplementationofsection716beforetheJuly21,2013,effectivedateoftheprovision. Toimplementtheriskretentionrequirementsinsection941oftheDodd-FrankAct,theFederalReserve,alongwithotherfederalregulatory agencies,issuedinMarch2011aproposalthatgenerallywouldforcesecuritizationsponsorstoretainatleast5percentofthecreditriskoftheassetsunderlyingasecuritization. Theagencieshavereviewedthesubstantialvolumeofcommentsontheproposalandthedefinitionofaqualifiedmortgageintherecentfinal"ability-to-pay"ruleoftheConsumerFinancialProtectionBureau(CFPB). Asyouknow,theCFPB'sdefinitionofqualifiedmortgageservesasthefloorforthedefinitionofexemptqualifiedresidentialmortgagesintheriskretentionframework. Theagenciesareworkingcloselytogethertodeterminenextstepsintheriskretentionrulemakingprocess,withaviewtowardcraftingadefinitionofaqualifiedresidentialmortgagethatisconsistentwiththelanguage InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |31 andpurposesofthestatuteandhelpsensurearesilientmarketforprivate-labelmortgage-backedsecurities. ImprovingSystematicSupervisionofLargeBankingFirms Giventheriskstofinancialstabilityexposedbythefinancialcrisis,theFederalReservehasreorienteditssupervisoryfocustolookmorebroadlyatsystemicrisksandhasstrengtheneditsmicro-prudentialsupervisionoflarge,complexbankingfirms. WithintheFederalReserve,theLargeInstitutionSupervisionCoordinatingCommittee(LISCC)wassetuptocentralizethesupervisionoflargebankingfirmsandtofacilitatetheexecutionofhorizontal,cross-firmanalysisofsuchfirmsonaconsistentbasis. TheLISCCincludesseniorstafffromvariousdivisionsoftheBoardandfromtheReserveBanks. Itfostersinterdisciplinarycoordination,usingquantitativemethodstoevaluateeachfirmindividually,relativetootherlargefirms,andaspartofthefinancialsystemasawhole. OnemajorsupervisoryexerciseconductedbytheLISCCeachyearisaComprehensiveCapitalAnalysisandReview(CCAR)ofthelargestU.S.bankingfirms. Buildingonsupervisoryworkcomingoutofthecrisis,CCARwasestablishedtoensurethateachofthelargestU.S.bankholdingcompanies Hasrigorous,forward-lookingcapitalplanningprocessesthateffectivelyaccountfortheuniquerisksofthefirmand Maintainssufficientcapitaltocontinueoperationsthroughouttimesofeconomicandfinancialstress.CCAR,whichusestheannualstresstestasakeyinput,enablestheFederalReservetomakeacoordinated,horizontalassessmentoftheresilienceandcapitalplanningabilitiesof InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |32 thelargestbankingfirmsand,indoingso,createscloserlinkagebetweenmicro-prudentialandmacro-prudentialsupervision. LargebanksupervisionattheFederalReservewillincludemoreofthesesystematic,horizontalexercises. ImprovingtheResolvabilityofLargeBankingFirms Oneimportantgoalofpost-crisisfinancialreformhasbeentocountertoo-big-to-failperceptionsbyreducingtheanticipateddamagetothefinancialsystemandeconomyfromthefailureofamajorfinancialfirm. Tothisend,theDodd-FrankActcreatedtheOrderlyLiquidationAuthority(OLA),amechanismdesignedtoimprovetheprospectsforanorderlyresolutionofasystemicfinancialfirm,andrequiredalllargebankholdingcompaniestodevelop,andsubmittosupervisors,resolution plans. Certainothercountriesthatarehometolarge,globallyactivebankingfirmsareworkingalongroughlyparallellines. TheBaselCommitteeandtheFinancialStabilityBoardhavedevotedconsiderableattentiontotheorderlyresolutionobjectivebydevelopingnewstandardsforstatutoryresolutionframeworks,firm-specificresolutionplanning,andcross-bordercooperation. Althoughmuchworkremainstobedonebyallcountries,the Dodd-FrankActreformshavegenerallyputtheUnitedStatesaheadofitsglobalpeersontheresolutionfront. SincethepassageoftheDodd-FrankAct,theFDIChasbeendevelopingasingle-point-of-entrystrategyforresolvingsystemicfinancialfirmsundertheOLA. AsexplainedbytheFDIC,thisstrategyisintendedtoeffecta creditor-fundedholdingcompanyrecapitalizationofthefailedfinancialfirm,inwhichthecriticaloperationsofthefirmcontinue,but InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |33 shareholdersandunsecuredcreditorsabsorbthelosses,culpablemanagementisremoved,andtaxpayersareprotected. KeytotheabilityoftheFDICtoexecutethisapproachistheavailabilityofsufficientamountsofunsecuredlong-termdebttosupplementequityinprovidinglossabsorptioninafailedfirm. InconsultationwiththeFDIC,theFederalReserveisconsideringthemeritsofaregulatoryrequirementthatthelargest,mostcomplexU.S.bankingfirmsmaintainaminimumamountoflong-termunsecureddebt. Aminimumlong-termdebtrequirementcouldlendgreaterconfidencethatthecombinationofequityownersandlong-termdebtholderswould besufficienttobearalllossesattheconsolidatedfirm,therebycounteractingthemoralhazardassociatedwithtaxpayerbailoutswhileavoidingdisorderlyfailures. ReducingSystemicRiskintheShadowBankingSystem MostofthereformsIhavediscussedareaimedataddressingsystemicriskposedbyregulatedbankingorganizations,andallinvolveactiontheFederalReservecantakeunderitscurrentauthorities. Importantasthesemeasuresare,however,itisworthrecallingthatthetriggerfortheacutephaseofthefinancialcrisiswastherapidunwindingoflargeamountsofshort-termfundingthathadbeenmadeavailabletofirmsnotsubjecttoconsolidatedprudentialsupervision. Today,althoughsomeofthemostfragileinvestmentvehiclesandinstrumentsthatwereinvolvedinthepre-crisisshadowbankingsystemhavedisappeared,non-depositshort-termfundingremainssignificant. Insomeinstancesitinvolvesprudentiallyregulatedfirms,directlyorindirectly. Inothersitdoesnot. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |34 Thekeyconditionoftheso-called"shadowbankingsystem"thatmakesitofsystemicconcernisitssusceptibilitytodestabilizingfundingruns,somethingthatismorelikelywhentherecipientsoftheshort-termfundingarehighlyleveraged,engageinsubstantialmaturitytransformation,orboth. Manyofthekeyissuesrelatedtoshadowbankingandtheirpotentialsolutionsarestillbeingdebateddomesticallyandinternationally. U.S.andglobalregulatorsneedtotakeahard,comprehensivelookatthesystemicriskspresentinwholesaleshort-termfundingmarkets. AnalysisoftheappropriatewaystoaddressthesevulnerabilitiescontinuesasaprioritythisyearfortheFederalReserve. Intheshortterm,though,thereareseveralkeystepsthatshouldbetakenwithrespecttoshadowbankingtoimprovetheresilienceofourfinancialsystem. First,theregulatoryandpublictransparencyofshadowbankingmarkets,especiallysecuritiesfinancingtransactions,shouldbeincreased. Second,additionalmeasuresshouldbetakentoreducetheriskofrunson moneymarketmutualfunds. TheCouncilrecentlyproposedasetofseriousreformoptionstoaddressthestructuralvulnerabilitiesinmoneymarketmutualfunds. Third,weshouldcontinuetopushtheprivatesectortoreducetherisksinthesettlementprocessfortri-partyrepurchaseagreements. Althoughanindustry-ledtaskforcemadesomeprogressontheseissues,theFederalReserveconcludedthatimportantproblemswerenotlikelytobesuccessfullyaddressedinthisprocessandhasbeenusingsupervisoryauthorityoverthepastyeartopressforfurtherandfasteractionbytheclearingbanksandthedealeraffiliatesofbankholdingcompanies. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |35 Theamountofintradaycreditbeingprovidedbytheclearingbanksinthetri-partyrepomarkethasbeenreducedandisscheduledtobereducedmuchfurtherinthecomingyearsasaresultoftheseefforts. Butvulnerabilitiesinthismarketremainaconcern,andaddressingthesevulnerabilitieswillrequirethecooperationofthebroadarrayofparticipantsinthismarketandtheirfederalregulators. TheFederalReservewillcontinuetoreporttoCongressandpubliclyon progressmadetoaddresstherisksinthetri-partyrepomarket. Inadditiontotheseconcretestepstoaddressconcreteproblems,regulatorsmustcontinuetocloselymonitortheshadowbankingsectorandbewaryofsignsthatexcessiveleverageandmaturitytransformationaredevelopingoutsideofthebankingsystem. Conclusion Thefinancialregulatoryarchitectureisstrongertodaythanitwasintheyearsleadinguptothecrisis,butconsiderableworkremainstocompleteimplementationoftheDodd-FrankActandthepost-crisisglobalfinancialreformprogram. Overthecomingyear,theFederalReservewillbeworkingwithotherU.S.financialregulatoryagencies,andwithforeigncentralbanksandregulators,toproposeandfinalizeanumberofongoinginitiatives. Inthisendeavor,ourgoalistopreservefinancialstabilityattheleastcosttocreditavailabilityandeconomicgrowth. Wearefocusedonthemonitoringofemergingsystemicrisks,reducingtheprobabilityoffailureofsystemicfinancialfirms,improvingthe resolvabilityofsystemicfinancialfirms,andbuildingupbuffersthroughoutthefinancialsystemtoenablethesystemtoabsorbshocks. Aswetakethisworkforward,itisimportanttorememberthatpreventingafinancialcrisisisnotanendinitself. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |36 Financialcrisesareprofoundlydebilitatingtotheeconomicwell-beingofthenation. Thankyouforyourattention.Iwouldbepleasedtoansweranyquestionsyoumighthave. Notes DanielK.TarullotookofficeonJanuary28,2009,tofillanunexpiredtermendingJanuary31,2022. PriortohisappointmenttotheBoard,Mr.TarullowasProfessorofLawatGeorgetownUniversityLawCenter,wherehetaughtcoursesin internationalfinancialregulation,internationallaw,andbankinglaw. PriortojoiningtheGeorgetownLawfaculty,Mr.TarulloheldseveralseniorpositionsintheClintonadministration. From1993to1998,Mr.Tarulloserved,successively,asAssistantSecretaryofStateforEconomicandBusinessAffairs,DeputyAssistanttothePresidentforEconomicPolicy,andAssistanttothePresidentforInternationalEconomicPolicy.HealsoservedasaprincipalonboththeNationalEconomicCouncilandtheNationalSecurityCouncil.From1995to1998,Mr.TarulloalsoservedasPresidentClinton'spersonalrepresentativetotheG7/G8groupofindustrializednations. Mr.TarullowasborninNovember1952inBoston,Massachusetts.HereceivedhisA.B.fromGeorgetownUniversityin1973andhisM.A.fromDukeUniversityin1974.In1977,Mr.TarulloreceivedhisJ.D.(summacumlaude)fromtheUniversityofMichiganLawSchool,whereheservedasArticleandBookReviewEditoroftheMichiganLawReview. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |37 InterviewwithCarlosMontalvo,ExecutiveDirectorofEIOPA,conductedbyGarryBooth,Reactionsmagazine(theUK) CanyouexplainwhattheinterimSolvencyIImeasures,sometimesknownasSolvency1.5, encompass? PerhapsIshouldstartwithadisclaimer:IthinkthenameSolvency1.5isunfortunate. WearenotbuildingfromSolvencyI,wearepreparingforRiskBasedSupervision. EIOPAwillissueGuidelinesaddressedtonationalsupervisorsonhowtoproceedintheinterimphaseleadinguptoSolvencyII. TheseGuidelineswillcoverthesystemofgovernance,includingriskmanagementsystemandaforwardlookingassessmentoftheundertaking'sownrisks(basedontheORSAprinciples),pre+applicationofinternalmodels,andreportingtosupervisors. FormoreinformationyoumaywishtoconsulttheEIOPAOpiniononinterimmeasuresregardingSolvencyII: https://eiopa.europa.eu/fileadmin/tx_dam/files/publications/opinions/EIOPA_Opinion+Interim+Measures+Solvency+II.pdf InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |38 DoestheproposalhaveacceptanceamongEUcountrysupervisors?Willeveryonemoveforwardtogether? TheabovementionedOpinionofEIOPAwasfirstwelcomed,andthenapprovedbytheEIOPABoardofSupervisors,whichconsistsofthenationalsupervisoryauthoritiesoftheEUMemberStates. EIOPAexpectsthatallourBoardofSupervisorsmembersarecommittedtosetthegroundstodevelopaconsistentandconvergentsupervisoryapproachwithrespecttothepreparationofSolvencyII. EIOPA'sGuidelineswillensurethatimportantaspectsofthenewregimewillbephasedin,takingintoaccountdueproportionality. However,bynaturetheseInterimGuidelinesaresoftregulation(i.e.usedonasocalled"ComplyorExplainbasis"),sotherewillbenosanctionsifsomeNationalSupervisoryAuthorities(NSAs)donotfullycomplywiththeGuidelinesatthisstage. Whyhaveyoudecidedtoissueguidelines(Spring2013)?What'sintheguidelines? IntheabsenceofafinalagreementonSolvencyIIinthescheduledtimeline,EIOPAhasexpressedanopinioninordertoensureandenhancesoundriskbasedsupervisionandpreparetheindustryforthefinalSolvencyIIDirective. InsteadofreachingconsistentandconvergentsupervisionintheEU,differentnationalsolutionsmayemergetothedetrimentofagoodfunctioninginternalmarket. InordertoavoidthisscenarioEIOPAdecidedtodevelopguidelinesandtotakealeadinthepreparatoryprocessaimedataconsistentandconvergentapproachwithrespecttothepreparationofSolvencyII. EIOPAGuidelineswillallowsupervisorsandundertakingstobebetterpreparedfortheapplicationofthenewregulatoryframework. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |39 Tocutalongstoryshort,theguidelinesareanexcellentwayforallpartiestousetheextratimeofthedelayasawaytobebetterpreparedforimplementation. TheCROofglobalreinsurerrecentlytoldme,'Weareexperiencingeverincreasingrequirementsforinternalmodelapproval,witheachcountry carryingoutitsownassessment,withlimitedrelationtoproportionality... Thisprocessconsumesalotofresourceswithoutcreatingvalueithasevenstartedtodestroyvalue.AndthesituationmightgetevenworseuntilthefullformalimplementationofallSolvencyII'sthreepillarsin2015/16(oreven17). ItismysincerehopethatEIOPAwillhavethepowertoconvincelocalsupervisorstosticktotheoriginalintention:aprinciplebasedapproachfollowingtheprincipleofproportionality.' What'syourresponse? TherequirementsfortheuseofinternalmodelsaresetoutintheSolvencyIIDirective,andwillindeedbefurtherdevelopedintheupcomingimplementingmeasures,andEIOPAstandardsandguidelines. Suchrequirementswillhavetobefulfilledbyallundertakings(irrespectiveoftheirsize)iftheywanttouseaninternalmodelforSCR calculationsunderSolvencyII. EIOPAhasbeensupportingtheroleofInternalModelsinariskbasedframework,evenaftertheexperienceoftheBankingsector,wheremodelswhichweretooprinciplebasedhadasignificantroleinthecrisis. Thissupportshouldbeacknowledged,andtheneedtolearnfromwhathappenedaswell. EIOPArecognisesthattheusesoftheinternalmodelwillvaryfromundertakingtoundertakingandwillpointouttoNSAsthattheyhavetoassesscompliancewithrequirementsbasedonproportionality,according InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |40 tothenature,scaleandcomplexityoftherisksandbusinessoftheundertaking. Havingsaidthat,itisfairtosaythatEIOPArecognisesthatdifferencesbetweensupervisorycultures,MemberStates'legalregimesandanumberofresourcesavailable,haveled,intheshortterm,tosomeinconsistenciesinthesupervisoryapproacheswithrespecttointernalmodelreviewsinpreapplication. Preciselybecauseofthat,whenyoulookatourWorkProgramandobjectivesfor2013onwards,youwillseethatEIOPAisbuildingaCenterofExpertiseforInternalModelsthatwillworkonenhancingconsistencyandsupportingthosesupervisorsthatmayneedhelpachievingit. There’sbeenalotofuncertaintyaroundtheimplementationdateofSolvencyII.Realistically,whenwilltheprojectbecompleted? Let’sstartwithwhatmattersmost:SolvencyIIwillbeimplemented,andthereshouldbenodoubtsaboutit. Ontheapplicationdate,weareconfidentthattheframeworkwillbeapplicablein2016thoughIcannotgiveyou100%reassurancebecausethedecisionisnotmadeattheEIOPAlevel. ThedecisionhastobemadebyagreementbetweentheEuropean Council,EuropeanParliamentandtheEuropeanCommission. IcanconfirmthatEIOPAwilldothenecessaryworktomaketheimplementationofSolvencyIIhappenonJanuary2016. Butlet’sbeclear,oncewesettlethependingissueofLongTermGuarantees,partiesmustavoidthetemptationofreopeningmoreissues. SolvencyIIisagoodframework,itwillnotbeperfectonday1,butthisshouldnotbeanobstacletostart. DrElkeKoenig,presidentoftheGermansupervisorBafinrecentlysaidofSolvencyII,“Youhavecreatedamassivelycomplexsystemwhichis InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |41 probablyonlyfullyunderstandableforthosethathavecreatedit.”What’syourresponse? Thebasisofthesystemisquitesimple:itstrivesforriskbasedsupervisionthatincorporatestransparency,callsforaclearunderstandingofriskandgoodgovernance. Sotheideaissimplebutthewayithastobetranslatedintoaregulatoryframeworkiscomplex. SoDrKoenigisrightinthatsense. Whyisitsocomplex? Iwouldsaythatitiseverybody’sresponsibility(theregulators,theEuropeanCommission). Butinmanycasesthecomplexityisalsobeingdrivenbytheindustry. Whatcanwedotomakethingslesscomplex? Weneedtoenhancetheprincipleofproportionalitywhilebearinginmindthatthesameobjectivescanbemetindifferentwaysinparticular forthecompaniesthatarenotdoingcomplicatedbusiness,forSMEsetc. EIOPAisalsoaimingatreducingpartofthiscomplexity,withinitiativessuchasanITtoolkitforundertakingsthatcouldincludeawaytocalculatetheSCR,etc. Wedon’tjustacknowledgetheproblem,wetrytocomewithsolutions. AnotherCROtoldmethatregulatorsappeartonolongerfollowtheoriginalSolvencyIIframeworkrouteofprinciplebasedregulation. Forexample,theLevelThreeproposaltoaddacompliancefunctionandanactuarialfunction,withtheaddedrequirementthatnopersoncanbesimultaneouslyresponsibleformorethanonefunction. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |42 ShouldSolvencyII,asaprinciplebasedregime,forcecompaniestomakesuchdepartmentalchanges? Iwassurprisedatthisquestion. TheactionstheCROrefersto,areexplicitlycapturedinthelevel1Directive(articles46and48). Thereisafullarticleontheactuarialfunction(Article48)thatcontainsnumberofrequirements. Thelevel1textisprinciplebasedandthereisasecondlevelwhichgetsintomorenittygrittydetailstodowithbestpracticearoundthecomplianceandactuarialfunctions. Buttheprincipleofproportionalityshouldalwaysbekeptinmind.Furthermore,theintentionofSolvencyIIisnottoforcecompaniestodo theirbusinessinonewayoranother. Itshouldensurethatrisksareaddressedandthatthemeanstodoso,subjecttoproportionality,areimplemented. Onthatbasiswearenotgoingtoforcecompaniestorecruitapersontobeacomplianceofficeroranythinglikethat. Whatweexpectisthattheycomplywiththeprinciplesstatedinlevels1and2–complyinasoundwaybutnotinthesamewayforallthecompanies. Someindividualsinterprettheprinciplesasprescriptivebutitisnotourintentiontotellcompanieshowtostructuretheirbusiness. Weusethewordactuarialfunctionbutfunctiondoesnotmeanperson.Soinatinycompanyyoucouldhaveanactuarialfunctionthatdoesnot havetobeperformedbya‘pure’actuarybutinsteadbysomeonewhohas strongmathematicalknowledge. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |43 ArecountrysupervisorsstrayingfromtheoriginalSolvencyIIscript? Ourdutyistomakesurethatall27NSAsunderstandtheprincipleofriskbasedsupervisioninaconvergentwayandapplyitconsistently. Someofourmembershavetoldusthattheyneedtoenhanceriskmanagement,internalcontrols,ordisclosure. Sotheyhadsomeinternalprojectsonholdbecausetheseprojects weretobechannelledviaSolvencyII,whichisthesameforeverybody. NowSolvencyIIisnotcominginJanuary2014astheyexpectedandtheywanttomoveinthoseareas. SoexactlythenecessitytoavoidthedevelopmentofnationalsolutionswasstatedinEIOPAOpiniononInterimMeasuresRegardingSolvencyII,wherewearetalkingaboutnumberofareasforwhichtherewillbeinterimguidelinestargetedtoenhancepreparednesstowardsSolvency2. TheseGuidelinesindicatethatsupervisorsaresupportingtheoriginalideaofconvergenceandharmonization,theybelieveintheconceptofriskbasedsupervision,andEIOPAistakingtheleadtoensurethatimplementationwilltakeplaceinaconsistentway. EIOPAwantsto“pavethewayforfurthermutualunderstandingandfutureconvergencebetweentheEUandtheU.S.oninsuranceregulationandsupervision”. ButmanypeopleintheUSarguestronglyagainstconvergence.Whyisconvergenceimportantinyouropinion? Theconvergenceisimportantforouroverridingaim,whichistodevelopstrongglobalregulatoryandsupervisorystandards. ThepurposeoftheEU+USInsuranceDialogueistoenhancemutualunderstandingandcooperationaswellastopromotebusinessopportunity,consumerprotectionandeffectivesupervision. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |44 Weremainrespectfullyawareofthecommonalitiesanddifferencesofbothregimes,continuetostrivetoaddressimportantissuesintechnicaldetail,andmay,overtime,movetowardimprovedcompatibilitythatwillbenefitinsuranceconsumers,industryparticipants,andtheeconomy. ThereisagrowingviewthatSolvencyIIwillleadtorestructuringinthere/insuranceindustrywithM&Aandconsolidationtofollow.Doyouagreethiscouldbeanunintendedconsequence? Ihavebeenhearingthisforthelast15yearsandalsooftenaskedthisquestionatconferencesbyrepresentativesofsmallercompanies. AndIusedtogivesuchanexample: IliketobuybooksandIbuymybooksinatinybookshopinMadrid.Theownerreadsalotandheknowswhatthecustomerlikesandalways givesmegreatrecommendations. IcouldbuymybooksatBarnes&NobleoratAmazon.ButaslongasIgetsuchalevelofservice[frommylittlebookshop]Iwillneverdothat. Ifsmallerinsurancecompaniesunderstandtheneeds,bringaddedvaluetotheircustomersandalsounderstandthespecificsofthebusinesstheyunderwrite,theywillsucceed. TheywillevenbenefitfromSolvencyIIbecauseitgivesthemtheright incentivestohavebetterriskmanagement. Asforcompaniesthataresubjectedtorestructuringormergers,theywillfacesuchissuesbecausetheirproblemsarerelatedtoglobalisationand nottoSolvencyII. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |45 Supervisoryguidanceformanagingrisksassociatedwiththesettlementofforeignexchangetransactions ThepurposeofthisguidanceistoprovideupdatedguidancetosupervisorsandthebankstheysuperviseonapproachestomanagingtherisksassociatedwiththesettlementofFXtransactions. Thisguidanceexpandson,andreplaces,theBCBS'sSupervisoryguidanceformanagingsettlementriskinforeignexchangetransactionspublishedinSeptember2000. SincetheBCBS'sSupervisoryguidanceformanagingsettlementriskinforeignexchangetransactions(2000)waspublished,theforeignexchangemarkethasmadesignificantstridesinreducingtherisksassociatedwiththesettlementofFXtransactions. SubstantialFXsettlement-relatedrisksremain,however,notleastbecauseoftherapidgrowthinFXtradingactivities. Thedocumentprovidesamorecomprehensiveanddetailedviewongovernancearrangementsandthemanagementofprincipalrisk,replacementcostriskandallotherFXsettlement-relatedrisks. Inaddition,itpromotestheuseofpayment-versus-paymentarrangements,wherepracticable,toreduceprincipalrisk. Theguidanceisorganizedintoseven"guidelines"thataddressgovernance,principalrisk,replacementcostrisk,liquidityrisk,operationalrisk,legalrisk,andcapitalforFXtransactions. Thekeyrecommendationsemphasizethefollowing: InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |46 AbankshouldensurethatallFXsettlement-relatedrisksareeffectivelymanagedandthatitspracticesareconsistentwiththoseusedformanagingothercounterpartyexposuresofsimilarsizeandduration. AbankshouldreduceitsprincipalriskasmuchaspracticablebysettlingFXtransactionsthroughtheuseofFMIsthatprovidePVParrangements. WherePVPsettlementisnotpracticable,abankshouldproperlyidentify,measure,controlandreducethesizeanddurationofitsremainingprincipalrisk. Abankshouldensurethatwhenanalysingcapitalneeds,allFXsettlement-relatedrisksshouldbeconsidered,includingprincipalrisk andreplacementcostriskandthatsufficientcapitalisheldagainstthesepotentialexposures,asappropriate. Abankshouldusenettingarrangementsandcollateralarrangementstoreduceitsreplacementcostriskandshouldfullycollateraliseits mark-to-marketexposureonphysicallysettlingFXswapsandforwardswithcounterpartiesthatarefinancialinstitutionsandsystemicallyimportantnon-financialentities. Annex FXsettlement-relatedrisksandhowtheyarise 1.IntheperiodbetweenFXtradeexecutionandfinalsettlement,abankisexposedtoanumberofdifferentrisks. Therisksvarydependingonthetypeofpre-settlementandsettlementarrangements. AbankneedstounderstandtherisksassociatedwithFXtransactionsinordertoadequatelymanagethem. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |47 SectionAdescribesprincipalrisk,replacementcostriskandliquidityrisk.SectionBidentifiesanddescribesthepresenceofoperationalandlegalrisksbetweentradeexecutionandfinalsettlement. Finally,SectionCdiscussesthevariouspre-settlementandsettlementarrangementsandtheirimpactonrisks. Forthepurposesofexposition,therisksaredescribedfromthepointofviewof“abank”andafailedFX“counterparty”ofthatbank.SectionAdescribestherisksrelatingtoasingleFXtradebetweenabankanditscounterparty. ThisisgeneralisedtomultipletradesinSectionsBandC. A.Risksrelatingtocounterpartyfailuretodelivertheexpectedcurrency ThethreemainrisksassociatedwithFXtransactionsareprincipalrisk,replacementcostriskandliquidityrisk,whichariseduetothepossibilitythatacounterpartymayfailtosettleanFXtrade. Thisfailuremaybetemporary(egoperationalorliquidityproblemsofthecounterparty)orpermanent(egcounterparty’sinsolvency). Abankmaybecomeawareofapotentialfailureatanytimebetweentradingandthecompletionofsettlement,particularlyiftheproblemisduetoinsolvency. However,sometimes,abankmayonlyknowthataproblemhasoccurredonoraftersettlementdaywhenitdoesnotreceivethecurrencythatthecounterpartywasexpectedtodeliver. Initially,abankmaynotbeabletoidentifythecauseofthefailure,nordeterminewhetherthefailureistemporaryorpermanent. Abankisexposedtoprincipalrisk,replacementcostriskandliquidityriskuntilitreceivestheboughtcurrencywithfinality. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |48 Principalrisk Principalriskistheriskthatabankpaysawaythecurrencybeingsold,butfailstoreceivethecurrencybeingbought. Principalriskcanbethemostseriousriskbecausetheamountatriskcan beequaltothefullvalueofthetrade. Principalriskexistswhenabankisnolongerguaranteedthatitcan unilaterallycancelthepaymentofthecurrencyitsold(theunilateral cancellationdeadline). Giventhatabank’sunilateralpaymentcancellationdeadlinemaybeoneormorebusinessdaysbeforethesettlementdate,thisriskcanlastforasignificantperiodoftime. Replacementcostrisk ReplacementcostriskistheriskthatanFXcounterpartywilldefaultbeforeatradehassettledandthatthebankmustreplaceitwithanewtradeandadifferentcounterpartyatcurrentmarketprices(potentiallylessfavourableexchangerate). Assuch,thebankmayincuralossrelativetotheoriginaltrade.Replacementcostriskexiststhroughouttheperiodbetweentradeexecutionandfinalsettlement. Liquidityrisk Liquidityriskistheriskthatacounterpartywillnotsettleanobligationforfullvaluewhendue. Liquidityriskdoesnotimplythatacounterpartyisinsolventsinceitmaybeabletosettletherequireddebitobligationsatsomeunspecifiedlatertime. Liquidityriskexistsinadditiontoreplacementcostrisk. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |49 • Whetheradefaultisjustareplacementcostproblemorturnsintoaliquidityshortagedependsonwhetherabankcanreplacethefailedtradeintimetomeetitsobligationsor,atleast,toborrowthenecessarycurrencyuntilitcanreplacethetrade. • Inprinciple,liquidityriskcanexistthroughouttheperiodbetweentrade executionandfinalsettlement. • Inpractice,theprobabilityoftheproblemmaterialisingasaliquidityshortageandareplacementcostdependsonmanyfactors,including: • Thetimingofthedefault.Thecloserthedefaultistothesettlementdate,thelesstimeabankhastomakeotherarrangements. • Whetherabankhasalreadyirrevocablypaidawaythecurrencyitisselling.Ifso,thebankmayhavefewerliquidassetsavailabletopayforthereplacementtradeortouseascollateraltoborrowthecurrencyitneeds. • Thenatureofthetrade.Thelessliquidthecurrencybeingpurchasedand/orthelargerthevalueofthetrade,theharderitmaybetoreplace. • 11.Abankmayfindithardtopredicttheprobabilityofaliquidityshortage,asitcannotmakeasoundjudgmentbasedsolelyonnormalmarketconditions. • However,thereisastrongpositivecorrelationbetweenacounterpartydefaultandilliquidmarkets(iethedefaultmaybethecauseofthemarketilliquidityoraneffectofit). • Inaddition,tradesthatareeasytoreplaceinnormalconditionsmaybeimpossibletoreplacewhenmarketsarelessliquidandexperiencingstressedconditions. • B.Operationalandlegalrisks • 12.AbankmayalsofaceFXsettlement-relatedriskscausedbyweaknessesinitsownoperationsandweaknessesinthelegal InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |50 enforceabilityofcontractualtermsandthegoverninglawapplicabletoitstransactions. Ifabankhasinadequateoperationalcapabilitiesorifthereareweaknessesinthelegalbasisforthepre-settlementandsettlementarrangements,itcanfaceincreasedprincipalrisk,replacementcostriskandliquidityriskrelatingtocounterpartyfailure. Operationalriskistheriskoflossduetoexternaleventsorinadequateorfailedinternalprocesses,peopleandsystems. Thisdefinitionincludeslegalriskandexcludesstrategicandreputationalrisk. Inadequateskillsandinsufficientprocessingcapacitymayincreasepotentialexposures. Theseweaknessescancauseoperationaldelays,inaccurateconfirmationandreconciliation,oraninabilitytoquicklycorrectorcancelpayment instructions. Legalriskoccurswhenacounterparty’scontractualFXobligationsarenon-binding,unenforceableandsubjecttolossbecause: Theunderlyingtransactiondocumentationisinadequate; Thecounterpartylackstherequisiteauthorityorissubjecttolegaltransactionrestrictions; Theunderlyingtransactionorcontractualtermsareimpermissibleand/orconflictwithapplicablelaworregulatorypolicies;or Applicablebankruptcyorinsolvencylawslimitoraltercontractualremedies. 16.Legalproblemsmayaffectsettlementofaforeignexchangetransaction. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com