1 / 15

Web Services Discovery in Secure Collaboration Environments

Web Services Discovery in Secure Collaboration Environments. Mohamed Shehab Kamal Bhattacharya Arif Ghafoor. Introduction. Enterprises today are moving toward horizontal integration

tiara
Télécharger la présentation

Web Services Discovery in Secure Collaboration Environments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Web Services Discovery in Secure Collaboration Environments Mohamed Shehab Kamal Bhattacharya Arif Ghafoor

  2. Introduction • Enterprises today are moving toward horizontal integration • Multidomain application environments where distributed domains interoperate with each other is a reality in Web-services-based infrastructure • Collaboration enables domains to effectively share resources; however, it introduces several security and privacy challenges • Trusted mediator did not solve the isues • In this article, the authors • Use the current web service standards such as SOAP and UDDI to enable secure interoperability in a service-oriented mediator-free environment • Consider a multidomain system where each domain provides a set of Web services. • Propose a mechanism to allow for both secure interoperability and service discovery in a mediator-free multidomain Web-service-based system.

  3. Health Care System Example

  4. Health Care System Example • The edges between hospitals signify the established service collaborations. • Using these collaboration agreements, physicians in Ohio (Hospital A) are able to acquire services in Minnesota (Hospital B). • Using a combination of such collaborations enables physicians in Ohio to acquire services in California (Hospital D). • When a patient from California moves to Ohio, • The collaborations would enable doctors in Ohio to acquire authorizations to access services in California and retrieve the patient’s records

  5. Article’s Contributions • Three main contributions • Propose a multihop SOAP-based messaging protocol • Propose an authentication mechanism • Propose a service discovery protocol

  6. Role-Based Access Control • All collaboration domains have adopted RABC as their access control policies • In RBAC, permissions are associated with roles • In the hospital example, the doctor role dominates the nurse role • Cross-domain mappings is used for the collaboration among domains • Those mappings will be referred to as cross-links • Cross links are between the same domain and different domains • Domain administrators should agree on • Cross links selections • Restricted Access

  7. Mediator Free Collaboration • Secure interoperability should ensure two principles. • The principle of autonomy, • The principle of security • Use a central trusted third party SOLUTION • A mediator-free collaboration • A completely distributed form of cooperation • none of the collaborating domains has a global view of all the access control policies • There is no central trusted third-party • Domains dynamically access control decisions • Domains will use the access path discovery

  8. SOAPSimple Object Access Protocol • XML-based messaging protocol • Not tied to any particular transport protocol, operating system, or programming language • Three parts message : an envelope, header data, and a message body Access Path Discovery • Neighboring domains connect via cross-links • No immediate links, crate a secure access path • Collaboration between intermediate domains

  9. Path Authentication • SOAP messages propagate until source is found • A secure path mechanism is needed • SOAP ={Header , Body} = > Header ={Signature} • Signature = sign(h(Body ), e ) => h() is a secure one-way hash function => private key e, public key d • Signature cannot be forged • Verify signature => h(Bodyj) = sign(Signature j , d j) for all 0 ≤ j ≤ i.

  10. Security Attacks • Path Corruption attack • Path insertion attack : attempt to insert a new domain in the access path • Inability to generate a signature • Requires knowledge of the private key • Path deletion attack : attempt to delete a domain in the access path • Cannot generate a signature • Path cannot be authenticated • Path replay attack : malicious domain will try to capture a request and reply to it • Attacker not able to alter information in the SOAP body • Colluding domains attack : two domains will collude and forge a new access path • Conspiring domains are not able to generate a fake signature.

  11. Service discovery and UDDI • Service discovery is an important component of Web service architectures • Services are discovered by querying the public UDDI registry • A private UDDI infrastructure in which each domain maintains a private UDDI registry • Service discovery is closely tied to the access path discovery • A Domain should have sufficient authorizations to access the UDDI registry of the next domain • Authorizations are acquired by building access paths to roles in other domains • To discover a service, domains should disclose paths to those roles • Service discovery requests are sent using the same SOAP encapsulation

  12. UDDI Registries

  13. Steps • Steps 1–2. A service discovery arrives at a domain • Verify the request signatures (pass or drop) • Extract the encapsulated access path • Step 3. Check that the access secure with respect to the path-linking rules, Forward the service request and assigned access role to the request evaluation module. • Step 4. The request evaluation module queries • the private UDDI registry to discover services according to the service request criteria. • the access control policy to find the set of services assigned to the role -> Srq • The private UDDI returns a set of service identifiers ->Sc. • The request evaluation module computes the join between the sets of services Sc and Srq -> Sresult = Sc ∩ Srq . • Steps 5–6. • If the set Sresult is empty, the request is updated and forwarded to neighboring domains • Otherwise, the domains send a reply to the querying domain indicating the access path and path signature

  14. Number of Domains Effects

  15. P maxNeighborhood Probability

More Related