1 / 25

CIS 6930: Mobile Computing Mobile IP

CIS 6930: Mobile Computing Mobile IP. Sumi Helal Credit: majority of slides borrowed from one of Dave Johnson ’s talks,. 3. References. 2.1: C. Perkins and A. Myles, "Mobile IP," technical report.

timon-fowler
Télécharger la présentation

CIS 6930: Mobile Computing Mobile IP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CIS 6930: Mobile ComputingMobile IP Sumi Helal Credit: majority of slides borrowed from one of Dave Johnson’s talks, 3

  2. References • 2.1: C. Perkins and A. Myles, "Mobile IP," technical report. • 2.2: B. Lancki, A. Dixit, V. Gupta, "Mobile-IP: Supporting Transparent Host Migration on the Internet," Linux Journal, June 1996. • 2.3: D. Johnson and D. Maltz. "Protocols for Adaptive Wireless and Mobile Networkig", IEEE Personal Communication, 3(1), February 1996 • 2.4: C. Perkins and D. Johnson. "Mobility Support in IPv6," Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'96), November 1996. • 2.5: M. Baker, X. Zhao, S. Cheshire, J. Stone, Stanford University, "Supporting Mobility in MosquitoNet", USENIX Winter 1996

  3. Internet Protocol (IP) • Connectionless packet delivery • Unreliable delivery • IP host addresses consist of two parts • network id • host id • By design, host address is tied to its network

  4. Internet Protocol (IP) • Intermediate routers need only look at the network id • destination network responsible to get packet to right host • When a host moves to a new network, its IP address would have to change - packets to old address lost

  5. Mobile IP

  6. IETF Mobile IP Protocol(refer paper by Johnson & Maltz) • IETF = Internet Engineering Task Force: Standards development body for the Internet • Mobile IP allows a host to have a unique (location-independent) IP address. • Each host has a home agent on its home network. • The home agent forward IP packets when mobile host away from home.

  7. IETF Mobile IP Protocol(refer paper by Johnson & Maltz) • When away from home, mobile host has a care-of-address • care-of-address = address of foreign agent within the foreign subnet - the foreign agent delivers forwarded packets to mobile host • care-of-address may also be a temporary IP address on the foreign network

  8. Basic Architecture

  9. IETF Mobile IP • When moving, the host register with home agent - home agent always knows the host’s current care-of-address. • Correspondent host = Host that wants to send packets to the mobile host • Correspondent host sends packets to the host’s IP address, which are routed to the host’s home network.

  10. IETF Mobile IP • Correspondent host need not know that the destination is mobile. • Home agent encapsulates and tunnels packets to the mobile host’s care-of-address.

  11. Encapsulation and Tunneling • IP-in-IP encapsulation • Received IP packet is encapsulated in a new IP packet with a new header. In the new header: • Destination = care-of-address • Source = address of home agent • Protocol number = IP-in-IP

  12. Encapsulation and Tunneling • Encapsulation protocol at foreign agent removes added header, and transmits the packet to the mobile host over the local network interface

  13. IP-in-IP Encapsulation

  14. Minimal Encapsulation • Reduces the additional bytes added to header when encapsulating: 8 or 12 bytes are added. • Original source address need not be included in the tunnel header, if the original source is also the tunneling node

  15. Authentication • As host B can send “moving to new location” registration messages to host A’s home server, host B can pretend to be host A, and receive packets destined for host A. • To avoid this, all registration messages must be “authenticated”. • Protection against “replay” attacks must be provided.

  16. Route Optimizations • Binding updates : Correspondent host receives (from home agent) a binding update informing mobile host’s current care-of-address, when the home agent receives a packet from the correspondent host + the packet is forwarded • Correspondent host can cache the binding, and future packets can be tunneled directly to the care-of-address (without going via home agent) • Cache consistency: A cached binding becomes stale when the mobile host moves

  17. Route Optimization

  18. Route Optimizations • Binding warning: Used by old foreign agent, to request the home agent to send current binding to a correspondent host. • When a host moves: • Old foreign agent may cache a forwarding pointer to the new foreign agent: packets re-tunneled along the forwarding pointer + binding warning sent to home agent to update the correspondent with the new binding

  19. Route Optimization • Old foreign agent may not cache (or purge) the forwarding pointer: packets forwarded to home agent. Home agent tunnels it to current care-of-address + sends binding update to correspondent

  20. MosquitoNet • No foreign agent • Visiting mobile host is assigned a temporary IP address corresponding to the foreign subnet. • Packets are tunneled directly to the mobile host (without having to go through a foreign agent)

  21. MosquitoNet -- Advantages • Mobile hosts can visit networks that do not have home agents • Foreign agent is no more a single point of failure • Scalability: Foreign agent not needed on every network that a mobile may visit. Home agents only needed on networks with mobile clients • Simpler protocol: Only part of foreign agent functionality needed

  22. MosquitoNet -- Disadvantages • Mobile host needs to acquire a temporary IP on foreign subnet • Security: If a temporary IP address is re-assigned to another mobile to soon, the new mobile may receive packets intended for the previous mobile. • Packet loss: Foreign agents can forward packets destined for a mobile host that has moved to another foreign subnet. Without foreign agents, the packets will simply be lost. • Mobile host is more complex, as it must incorporate some of the functionality of a foreign agent.

  23. Other Protocols: CDPD • CDPD: Cellular Digital Packet Data • Similarity to Mobile IP: • triangular routing approach between mobile host and home and foreign agents • Differences: • User IP assigned by CDPD service provider • Uses prop. Tunneling not IP-in-IP • Not strictly above the data link layer

  24. Other Protocols: GPRS • GPRS: General Packet Radio Data GSN: GPRS Support Node MSC: Mobile Switching Center BTS: Base Transciever Station BSC: Base Station Controller

  25. Mobile IP vs. CDPD vs. GPRS • CDPD is slowing down (today Jan 1999) • Mobile IP is big in the US. IETF is behind it • US industry just started adapting Mobile IP (Sisco routers!). • Motorola’s iDEN network is Mobile IP based. • Microsoft’s position is not clear yet. Would they finally bundle it with Windows CE? • Europe: Initial copying of Mobile IP efforts. But now do have the advantages of wider interoperability (which is a UMTS requirement)

More Related