1 / 2

Action items – July 30,2004

Action items – July 30,2004. Issues to bring to SAS Core meeting (Heather?): Systems tests should be looked at by the people that create the code

tiva
Télécharger la présentation

Action items – July 30,2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Action items – July 30,2004 • Issues to bring to SAS Core meeting (Heather?): • Systems tests should be looked at by the people that create the code • Bear in mind that THE CODE goes to em release and I&T relies on it (a complete rewrite of CalDigi and CalUtil occurred to handle individual gains and noise per channel , with bugs…) • We need to handle it better since it affected I&T • I&T also needs to look at it, and we are doing so… • GEM decoding (see below) • Documentation for merit ntuple • To whom do we send comments? Who implements it? • Elapsed_time and run does not conform with variable name convention (?) • MIP presentation (CAL+TKR) (Dario): • Sasha pointed out low efficiency for MIP selection, • Blll explained that CalTwrGap tails can be explained by tracks that go through the CAL without hitting the crystals and the value then becomes larger • GEM presentation (Anders): • Come up with a baseline proposal for implementation for the next meeting • GLT words in MC come from digis not from GEM • GEM is not in the MC simulation (deadtime for example which was one of the workshop assignments) • GEM will go into TDS unpacked • Each vector becomes a variable in the merit ntuple • Bit description will be available • Arrays to be added in the SVAC analysis file • Many configurations (details to follow later) • Eduardo and Luis to talk about trigger primitives

  2. Action items – July 30,2004 • Tracker/ToT presentation: • Eduardo recognized importance of rewrite of TkrRecon • we need to coordinate changes to em release to make sure we minimize the pain from all sides (SAS/I&T) • Leon is a bit unsure who is providing TOT calibration constants and when they are needed • Eduardo will talk to Hiro/Johann • Eduardo to ask Hiro/Italy about studying time dependence of noisy strips • feedback to Leon on expectations from hardware (i.e. there may be many intermittent noisy strips during I&T) • Traudl suggested dead/noisy distinction to be made • MC energy and time presentation (Toby): • Muons with TKR triggers: 10 MeV triggers in MC file • Bill suggested Toby check angular dependence • Elapsed_time does not correspond to reality • Time should be elapsed seconds from Jan 1 2001 midnight • Eduardo to find out what and when the fix is needed • Cal Diode presentation (David): • Postponed to next week

More Related