1 / 97

UW-Whitewater

UW-Whitewater. Campus Climate Assessment Results of Report. May 4, 2010. Assessing Campus Climate. Rankin & Reason, 2008. Campus Climate & Students. 1 Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991, 2005

tiva
Télécharger la présentation

UW-Whitewater

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UW-Whitewater Campus Climate Assessment Results of Report May 4, 2010

  2. Assessing Campus Climate Rankin & Reason, 2008

  3. Campus Climate & Students 1 Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991, 2005 2 Cabrera, Nora, Terenzini, Pascarella, & Hagedron, 1999; Feagin, Vera & Imani, 1996; Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991. 3 Hale, 2004; Harper & Quaye , 2004; Harper, & Hurtado, 2007; Hurtado, 2003.

  4. The Climate Project & Inclusive Excellence • The Climate Study is foundational to Inclusive Excellence in that it is the first time in the UW System that we are collecting data on multiple and intersectional identities based on experiences and perceptions of campus life by all members of the community.  • It is a population study that encouraged every campus community member to provide input on the campus climate. • The input, data, and final results will be used in tandem with other data as a starting point to build an action plan that speaks to Inclusive Excellence.

  5. Process to Date Participating Institutions

  6. Results Response Rates

  7. Who are the respondents? • 3,239 people responded to the call to participate (26% response rate overall). • Several respondents contributed remarks to the open-ended questions.

  8. Who are the respondents?

  9. Faculty Response Rates Professor (63%, n = 57) Associate Professor (62%, n = 71) Assistant Professor (60%, n = 79) Instructional Academic Staff (42%, n = 90) Adjunct Faculty (16%, n = 7)

  10. Faculty Response Rates by Selected Demographics

  11. Staff Response Rates Classified Staff Exempt (99%, n = 71) Non-Instructional Academic Staff (61%, n = 130) Classified Staff Non-Exempt (45%, n = 133) Limited Term Employee (25%, n = 15) Limited Academic Staff (14%, n = 5) Administrators (n = 29)

  12. Staff Response Rates by Selected Demographics

  13. Student Response Rates Bachelor Degree Student (20%, n = 1,869) Master Degree Student (16%, n = 226) Transfer (n = 143) Associate Degree (n = 142) Non-Degree Seeking (n = 37) Professional Degree (n = 23) Dual Enrollment (n = 5)

  14. Student Response Rates by Selected Demographics

  15. Results Demographic Characteristics

  16. Student Respondents by Class Standing (n)

  17. Student Residence

  18. Income by Student Status (n)

  19. Employee Respondents by Position Status (n)

  20. Collapsed Employee Status (n)

  21. Respondents by Gender and Position Status (n) There were 5 respondents who identified as transgender

  22. Respondents by Sexual Orientation and Position Status (n)

  23. Respondents by Racial Identity(Duplicated Total)

  24. Respondents by Racial Identity (Unduplicated Total)

  25. Respondents by Spiritual Affiliation (n)

  26. Respondents with Conditions that Substantially Affect Major Life Activities (n)

  27. Citizenship Status by Position * Data is missing due to n < 5

  28. Findings

  29. Overall Comfort Levels

  30. Overall Satisfaction

  31. Levels of Satisfaction by Demographic Groups

  32. Employee Comments with Regard to Job and Career Progression Satisfaction • Employees who were satisfied with their careers enjoyed working with students, their colleagues, and within their departments. They felt challenged and appreciated. • Those respondents who were dissatisfied were disappointed in their low salaries; lack of opportunities for professional advancement; and “dysfunctional” departments, coworkers, or supervisors. A number of the dissatisfied individuals indicated they felt overworked, unchallenged, and underappreciated.

  33. Student Comments with Regard to Satisfaction with Academic Experiences • Students who were satisfied with the way their experiences at UW-Whitewater said they enjoyed their courses; faculty were caring, helpful, and intelligent; they were “on track” to graduate in four years; felt UW-Whitewater had adequate resources available to students; and enjoyed relationships with their student peers. • Dissatisfied students said they were disappointed in their courses; faculty were uncaring and/or uninterested; general education courses wasted their time; and academic advisors failed to provide sufficient advice.

  34. Challenges and Opportunities

  35. Experiences with Harassment

  36. Personally Experienced Based on…(%)

  37. Overall Personal Experiences of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Due to Gender (by Gender) (%) (n=283)¹ (n=105)² (n=155)¹ (n=22)² ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct.

  38. Overall Personal Experiences of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Due to Position Status by Position Status (%) (n=258)¹ (n=42)² (n=77)¹ (n=32)² (n=38)¹ (n=14)² (n=57)¹ (n=18)² ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct.

  39. Overall Personal Experiences of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Due to Race by Race (%) (n=75)¹ (n=36)² (n=359)¹ (n=12)² ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct.

  40. Overall Personal Experiences of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Due to Sexual Orientation by Sexual Orientation (%) (n=45)¹ (n=24)² (n=387)¹ (n=7)² ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct.

  41. Overall Personal Experiences of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Due to Disability Status by Disability Status (%) (n=382)¹ (n=15)² (n=19)¹ (n=7)² (n=22)¹ (n=9)² (n=21)¹ (n=11)² ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct. .

  42. Form of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 445). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

  43. Form of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 445). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

  44. Respondents Who Believed They Were Deliberately Ignored or Excluded • Where Did The Perceived Conduct Occur? • 34 percent (n = 75) - in a class • 33 percent (n = 71) - in a meeting with a group of people Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 445). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

  45. Respondents Who Believed They Were Intimidated or Bullied • Where Did The Perceived Conduct Occur? • 34 percent (n = 48) - at a campus job • 25 percent (n = 36) - in a class Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 445). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

  46. Respondents Who Believed They Received Stares • Where Did The Perceived Conduct Occur? • 53 percent (n = 49) - in a class • 47 percent (n = 44) - while walking on campus Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 445). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

  47. Source of Perceived Conduct by Position Status (n)

  48. What did you do?1 Personal responses: • Was angry (56%) • Felt embarrassed (41%) • Told a friend (39%) • Avoided the harasser (34%) • Ignored it (28%) Reporting responses: • Didn’t know who to go to (17% ) • Made a complaint to a campus employee/official (16%) • Did not report the incident for fear of retaliation (18%) • Didn’t report it for fear my complaint would not be taken seriously (12%) • Did report it but my complaint was not taken seriously (9%) 1Respondents could mark more than one response

  49. Sexual Harassment/Sexual Assault The survey defined sexual harassment as “A repeated course of conduct whereby one person engages in verbal or physical behavior of a sexual nature, that is unwelcome, serves no legitimate purpose, intimidates another person, and has the effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work or classroom environment.” The survey defined sexual assault as “Intentional physical contact, such as sexual intercourse or touching, of a person’s intimate body parts by someone who did not have permission to make such contact.”

More Related