1 / 82

Recent BESII Results Representing BESII Collaboration Weiguo Li

Recent BESII Results Representing BESII Collaboration Weiguo Li Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing 100049, P.R. China liwg@ihep.ac.cn Sino-German Workshop Frontiers in QCD DESY, Hamburg, Sep. 20, 2006. Outline Introduction Hadron Spectroscopy from J/ Decays

tobit
Télécharger la présentation

Recent BESII Results Representing BESII Collaboration Weiguo Li

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Recent BESII Results Representing BESII Collaboration Weiguo Li Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing 100049, P.R. China liwg@ihep.ac.cn Sino-German Workshop Frontiers in QCD DESY, Hamburg, Sep. 20, 2006

  2. Outline • Introduction • Hadron Spectroscopy from J/ Decays • (2S) and CJ Physics • (3770) non DD Decays • Future Plan • Summary

  3. BESII Detector VC: xy = 100 m TOF: T = 180 ps counter: r= 3 cm MDC: xy = 250 m BSC: E/E= 22 % z = 5.5 cm dE/dx= 8.4 %  = 7.9 mr B field: 0.4 T p/p=1.8(1+p2) z = 2.3 cm Dead time/event: 〈10 ms

  4. Data from BESI and BESII BESII finished data taking April 2006

  5. Light Hadron Spectroscopy from J/ Decays • Scalars: ,  clearly observed • Possible pp bound state in J/  pp • X(1835) in J/  ’ • The  threshold enhancement in J/   • New observation of a broad 1- - resonance in J/  K+K- 0 • other topics

  6. The  pole in at BESII 0 M(+-0)  M()  M(+-)  Averaged pole position: MeV Phys. Lett. B 598 (2004) 149

  7. κ Phys. Lett. B 633 (2006) 681

  8. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 022001 (2003) Observation of an anomalous enhancement near the threshold of mass spectrum at BES II J/ygpp BES II acceptance weighted BW +3 +5 -10 -25 M=1859 MeV/c2 G < 30 MeV/c2 (90% CL) c2/dof=56/56 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 3-body phase space M(pp)-2mp (GeV) acceptance

  9. This narrow threshold enhancement is NOT observed in J/pp at BESII • This indicates X(1860) has a production property similar to ’ meson. • This also indicates X(1860) may have strong coupling to gluons as ’ meson. Preliminary J/ pp No narrow strong enhancement near threshold

  10. Not seen in pp experiment • In pp experiments, its expected cross-section is much smaller than continuum process • In pp elastic scattering, I=1 S-wave dominant, while in J/ radiative decays I=0 S-wave dominant. • Pure FSI disfavored not seen in: B+ K+ pp (BELLE) Y(1S) pp(CLEO)

  11. X(1835) 5.1  X(1835) 6.0  Observation of X(1835) in J/+-

  12. Combine two channels 7.7 Statistical Significance 7.7  X(1835) Phys. Rev. Lett., 95 (2005) 262001

  13. Re-fit to J/pp including FSI Include FSI curve from A.Sirbirtsev et al. ( Phys.Rev.D71:054010, 2005) in the fit (I=0) M = 1830.6  6.7 MeV  = < 153 MeV @90%C.L. In good agreement with X(1835)

  14. X(1860) and X(1835) might be the same state • masses and widths are consistent. • both connected with ’ meson.  Its spin-parity should be 0-+: this would be an important test. Excited ’ ? Glueball? pp bound state? A mixture of glueball and pp bound state?

  15. Observation of  thresholdenhancement in J/    M(K+K-)   M(K+K-) M(+-0) Dalitz plot   M2(g) M(+-0) M2(gw)

  16. A clear threshold enhancement is observed Phase Space Eff. curve Side-bands Side-bands do not have mass threshold enhancement!

  17. The decay of J/ is observed and an enhancement in  is found near the threshold. • PWA shows: the enhancement favors 0++ • Is it the same 0++ observed in KK or , or is it a • glueball, or a hybrid …..? • Further study in , K*K*,  …. desirable ! Phys. Rev. Lett., 96 (2006) 162002

  18. New observation of a broad 1- - resonance in J/  K+K- 0 K*(1410) 0 K*(892) 0 sideband background ? hep-ex/0606047, accepted by PRL

  19. What is the threshold bump? • JPC should be 1--, 3--, … (Parity conservation) • PWA results • Following components are neededK*(892), K*(1410), (1700), X • 1– is much better than 3— • Pole position of X is • Br • Big destructive interference among X, (1700) and PS

  20. More Checks • Replace X by (770), (1900), (2150) with interference among each other, S = 85 not from the interference of known particles • Replace X by (1450) S = 36 ( 8.2)& Br((1450) K+K-) < 1.6  10-3 (95% C.L.)  not (1450) • Further look in to determine its isospin • Search for its K*K, KK decay modes

  21. Property of X(1580) • The width is much broder than other mesons, such as (1450), (1700) Could have different nature from conventional mesons. • The large width is the expectation for a multiquark state(Tetraquark interpretation: M. Karliner, H.J. Lipkin, hep-ph/0607093)

  22. Observation of an enhancement near mass threshold in process M = (2075 12  5) MeV Γ = (90  35  9) MeV 7 stat. sig. BR = (5.9  1.4  2.0) 10-5 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 112002

  23. Near threshold enhancement in Nx (PS, eff. corrected) Nx suggesting a strong coupling to K Mass 1500~1650MeV Width70~110MeV JP favors 1/2- In the internal referee process

  24. BES II Preliminary   M(+-0)(GeV/c2) M(+-0)(GeV/c2) M(+-0)(GeV/c2) M(+-0)(GeV/c2)  sideband w signal with multiple entries w signal after best candidate selection (best w masses)

  25. M() M() Side-band Phase Space Eff. curve

  26. PWA analysis f0(1710) f0(1790) f0(1810) Total (1760) > 10  f0 6.5  (1760) f0(1710) Using observed mass and width for f0(1810) in J/y  g w f2(1640) 5.5  f2(1910) f2(160) f2(1910) 5.8  BG BG M() M() (GeV/c2)

  27. dominated by (1760) • a 0++ is possible needed (6.5 ) Accepted by PRD, hep-ex/0604045

  28. Study of the excited baryons

  29. The evidence of 2 new N* states in N*(1520) N*(1535) N*(1650) N*(1675) N*(1680) N*(1440)? ? PRL97, 062001 (2006)

  30. (2S) Decays • Transitions (~82%) • Hadronic transitions (~54%) • Radiative transitions (~28%) • Leptonic decays (~ 2%) • Hadronic decays (~15%) • Strong decays (~13%) • EM decays (~ 2%) • Radiative decays (~ 1%) • Rare decays and beyond SM (<<1%)

  31. (2S) leptonic decays: B(’+-) • First observation by DASP: ZPC1, 233(1979), no BR • First measurement by BESI: PRD65, 052004 (2002) • B=(0.271±0.043±0.055)% • Improvements: • Continuum contribution measured in data • Efficiency and background estimation • Interference subtraction more reasonable • Results: • 1015 events at resonance • 146 at continuum • B=(0.320±0.022±0.040)% • Lepton universality checked BES: preliminary

  32. (2S) and CJ Physics Continuum contribution and phase in (2S) decays Branching ratios Phase Interference needs to be considered. Continuum contribution should be subtracted … The interference are neglected in many of the current analyses.

  33. In analyzing (2S) decays, the continuum contribution should be subtracted and the phases between three glue and one photon process can be measured. With BESII 14 M (2S) events and 6.4 pb-1(s=3.65 GeV) and CLEOc 3 M events and 21 pb-1(s=3.67 GeV)12% rule are tested and the phases between three glue and one photon process for different processes are measured.

  34. The universal -90°phase? |φ| J/ψ Decays: 1. AP: 90°M. Suzuki, PRD63, 054021 (2001) 2. VP: (106 ±10)°J. Jousset et al., PRD41, 1389 (1990) D. Coffman et al., PRD38, 2695 (1988) N. N. Achasov, talk at Hadron2001 3. PP: (90 ±10)°M. Suzuki, PRD60, 051501 (1999) (103±7)°BES, PRD69, 012003 (2004) 4. VV: (138 ±37)°L. Köpke and N. Wermes, Phys. Rep. 174, 67 (1989) 5. NN: (89 ±15)°R. Baldini et al., PLB444, 111 (1998) ψ(2S) Decays: 1. VP: φ=180°(± 90 ° ruled out!)M. Suzuki, PRD63, 054021 (2001) φ=180° or φ=-90°P. Wang et al., PRD69, 057502 (2004) 2. PP: (-82±29)°or(121±27)° BES, PRL92, 052001 (2004) & Yuan, Wang, Mo, PLB567, 73 (2003)

  35. The “12% rule” M. Appelquist and H. D. Politzer, PRL34, 43 (1975) This is the famous (or notorious) “12% rule”.

  36. “12% rule”and“ puzzle” • Violation found by Mark-II , confirmed by BESI at higher sensitivity. • Extensively studied by BESII/CLEOc • VP mode:  , K*+K-+c.c., K*0K0+c.c., 0,… • PP mode: KSKL, K+K-, +- • BB mode: pp, , … • VT mode: K*K*2, f2’, a2, f2 • 3-body: pp0, pp, +-0, … • Multi-body: KSKShh, +-0 K+K- , 3(+-), … MARK-II K*K ρπ

  37. ’  PP BES, PRL 92, 052001 (2004) 156 evts Interference between ’ and continuum amplitudes in K+K- was not considered. CLEO, PRD74, 011105(R)(2006) Two possible phases: -80° or +121°. 4 evts 139 evts 53 evts

  38. J/, ’  PP: 12% rule BES, PRL 92, 052001 (2004) CLEO, PRD74, 011105(R)(2006) KK mode enhanced relative to the 12% rule. Pure EM mode  not enhanced, may be suppressed. J/  and ’ are related by ee of charmonia and  form factors.

  39. ’ + - 0 BESII: PLB619, 247 (2005) CLEOc: PRL94, 012005 (2005) 2290s 1960s BESII CLEOc BES and CLEOc in good agreement!

  40. ’ + - 0 Dalitz plots after applying 0 mass cut! Very different from J/3! CLEOc BESII J/ Similar Dalitz plots, different data handling techniques: PWA vs counting! ’ is observed, it is not completely missing, BR is at 10-5 level!

  41. J/, ’ VP BESII : PLB614, 37 (2005); PRD73, 052007 (2006) CLEOc : PRL94, 012005 (2005)

  42. Multi-body ’ decays BES: PRD71, 72006 (2005); PRD74, 12004 (2006) BESII, PRD73, 052004 (2006) CLEOc: PRD72, 051108 (2005) Some modes are suppressed, some are enhanced, while some others obey the 12% rule! CLEOc: PRL95, 062001 (2005)

  43. BES: preliminary ’ radiative decays • Total BR measured ~ 0.12% (total radiative decays ~1%)

  44. Mesonic decays BES: PRD73, 052004 (2006) PRD72, 012002 (2005) PLB630, 21 (2005) In agreement with 12% rule expectation

  45. Baryonic decays BES: PRD71, 072006 (2005) BES: preliminary Most modes in agreement with 12% rule expectation, also exceptions!

  46. Summary of “12%” rule, • ’ VP suppressed • ’ PP enhanced • ’ VT suppressed • ’ BB obey/enh • Multi-body obey/sup Seems no obvious rule to categorize the suppressed, the enhanced, and the normal decay modes of J/ and ’. The models developed for interpreting specific mode may hard to find solution for other (all) modes. Similarly ’’ decays have a rule of 0.02%, more data and more sophisticated analysis are needed to extract the branching fractions from the observed cross sections. Here because the time limitation, I will omit the results in this talk. • Model to explain J/, ’ and ’’ decays naturally and simultaneously? • S-D mixing in ’ and ’’[J. L. Rosner, PRD64, 094002 (2001)] • DD-bar reannihilation in ’’(J. L. Rosner, hep-ph/0405196) • Four-quark component in ’’[M. Voloshin, PRD71, 114003 (2005)] • Survival cc-bar in ’(P. Artoisenet et al., PLB628, 211 (2005)) • Other model(s)?

  47. ψ(2S) Decay is a cJ factory • ψ(2S)→cJ, J=0,1,2 • BJ~9%,“cJ factory” • observed in inclusive analysis • B(cJ→hadrons)are not • well known

  48. Pair production of vectors cJ c0 c1 c2 Improved precision over PDG (BESI) results on cJKKKK and . First measurement of cJKK. BES: cJ→2(K+K) hep-ex/0607025

  49. Pair production of vectors cJ 38 c0 28 c2 First observation: B(c0) = (2.290.580.41)10-3 B(c2) = (1.770.470.36)10-3 BES: PLB630, 7 (2005)

  50. c1 c2 cJh0h+h− BES: hep-ex/0607023 BES: PRD74, 012004 (2006)

More Related