1 / 17

NEW DRUGS INTRODUCTION IN VIETNAM – SHORT PROGRESS UPDATE

This article provides a short update on the progress of introducing the new drug Bedaquiline in Vietnam, including the process and activities done by steps according to the implementation plan, challenges encountered, and the advantages of the project.

tolbertd
Télécharger la présentation

NEW DRUGS INTRODUCTION IN VIETNAM – SHORT PROGRESS UPDATE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NEW DRUGS INTRODUCTION IN VIETNAM – SHORT PROGRESS UPDATE Manila, Dec.2014

  2. Summary • Process and activities done by steps acording to implementation plan • Challenges and obstacles encountered

  3. BDQ introduction/ Implementation plan • Step 1.Country’s readiness assessment • Step 2. Identification of partners involved (MOH, KNCV, WHO, NI&ADR centers, CHAI) • Step 3. Establishment of National Task Force and BDQ technical working group • Step 4: Development of national treatment plan for introduction of BDQ • Step 5: Bedaquiline implementation • Step 6: Generating evidence for scale up

  4. Step 1. country’s readiness assessment-Done

  5. Reporting and recording • Papers based R-R according to WHO’s report forms • Electronic reporting system • VITIMES (DS-TB) • e-TB manager (DR-TB): has piloted in HCM City and expanded (at district level in HCMC and provincial level in other PMDT provinces)

  6. PV methods in NTP Since 2013 Cohort Event Monitoring Spontaneous reporting Since 1994

  7. CEM in MDR-TB treatment • Study B6.1: AEs of anti-TB drugs in the treatment of MDR-TB in Vietnam. • Timeline: Now

  8. Step 2-3 (Done) • Step 2. Identification of partners involved (MOH, KNCV, WHO, NI&ADR centers, CHAI) • Step 3. Establishment of : • National Task Force (Vice Minister, representatives of MOH related departments, NTP) • BDQ technical working group

  9. Step 4: Development of national treatment plan for introduction of BDQ-Done • Selection of pilot sites (Hanoi, HCMC, Can Tho) • Update the treatment guidelines and training materials • Timeline development • Budget: GF approval for the first 100 patients in 2015

  10. Update treatment guideline • Target group for BDQ introduction • FQ resistance in MDR-TB patients • Second line injectable resistance in MDR-TB patients • XDR-TB patients • Others: • Intolerate with SLDs in standard cat 4 regimen • Resistant to at least 2 group 4 drugs (Cs,Pto/Eto,PAS) • Use on top of treatment regiment per WHO guidelines (companion handbook 2014)

  11. Timeline development

  12. BDQ introduction process-Activities done • April 2013: 1st introduction workshop of new TB drug Bedaquiline (WHO – Viet Nam MOH – NTP) • February 2014: 2nd workshop about BDQ (WHO – MOH – NTP): country’s readiness assessment for BDQ implementing • April 2014: establishment and 1st meeting of Vietnam BDQ technical working group, 1st draft of National Implementation plan • June 2014: Global Fund approved budget for treatment with BDQ for the first 100 patients • June 2014: 1st draft of Clinical guidelines of using BDQ in MDR/pre-XDR and XDR-TB treatment • July 2014: MOH officially established the National Task force for implementing new TB drug (heading by Vice Minister and representatives from related departments of MOH, NTP) • August 2014: NTP in collaboration with Pharmacovigilance dept. of Hanoi Pharmacy University to prepare the CEM for ADRs of BDQ (B5.16) • September 2014: 3rd meeting of BDQ TWG: revise and finalize required document. • November 2014: • Join the meeting on preparing for the introduction of new TB drugs & Inter-regional workshop on PV • 1st Task Force meeting: ways to prepare supporting documents to submit for approval

  13. Step 5: Bedaquiline implementation • Hold advocacy and initiation workshops in 3 pilot provinces among NTP – Provincial People Committee – Department of health – Provincial TB hospital (Dec 2014) • Preparing 3 pilot sites: materials, equipment and trainings (patient screening, clinical management, active pharmacovigilance …- Jan 2015) • Place the order of drugs (Jan 2015) • Patient screening and initiation: 1st patient enrolled in BDQ treatment (2nd Q/2015) • Monitoring treatment response • Detection, management and reporting of adverse events

  14. Step 6: Generating evidence for scale up • Minimum basic data set (compared with control groups) • Adverse events (harms) in individuals exposed to new drug • % of patients treated with bedaquiline who experienced severe adverse events (heart, liver) • % of patients whose regimen need to be changed due to AE • Response to treatment (effectiveness) • % of success rate • Time to culture convertion • % of patients who resistant to bedaquiline • Adhearance to treatment: • % Default • % interrupt using BDQ during 6 months • Patient’s experience of using BDQ • KEY DATA FOR ASSESSMENT OF Bedaquiline IMPLEMENTATION (No screened, eligible, enrolled, Tx outcome, etc)

  15. Advantages • Strong commitment of NTP leaders and pilot sites in BDQ implementation in Vietnam. Establishment of National TF with representatives from MOH (powerful advocacy) • Great technical support from partners, especially WHO (both head quarter and country office): experts, technical documents • Budget for 1st 100 patients (including drugs, examinations and PV) has already been approved by the Global Fund • Good collaboration with HN Pharmacy university in implementing pharmacovigilance activities for BDQ in the same time (also funded by the GF)

  16. Main challenges • BDQ is still in the phase III clinical trial  May delay in administrative procedures  require stronger advocacy effort • GF mainly supports drugs and examinations, still lack of funding for program cost and health system cost

  17. THANK YOU

More Related