1 / 9

Meeting Local Needs of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: Overcoming Barriers in Care

This project explores how to effectively meet the needs of men and women with intellectual disabilities (ID) transitioning from out-of-area placements to local care. It addresses the ongoing challenges highlighted by the Winterbourne View scandal and the national QIPP priority on mental health. Key questions include understanding the current barriers, evaluating the assumed efficiency savings in Peterborough's local provision, and assessing the quality of life for returning individuals. Insights will inform a comprehensive strategy to improve local care systems and ensure better outcomes.

tomasso-davock
Télécharger la présentation

Meeting Local Needs of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: Overcoming Barriers in Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CLAHRC Fellowship Project Coming Home : How best can the needs of men and women with ID from out of area placements be met locally, and what are the barriers?

  2. Context • Mansell 2 (DOH, 2007) and the re-affirmation to re-direct resources from expensive OOA placements • Winterbourne View scandal (2011) and on-going safeguarding concerns • Cost of OOA treatments - national QIPP priority in the area of Mental Health • NHS Peterborough financial turnaround plans

  3. Project questions • How best can the needs of men and women with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) from out of area placements be met locally, and what are the present barriers and enablers? • Have the saving assumptions detailed in the Peterborough LD efficiency savings programme been fully realised? • What has been the experience of a defined number of ‘returnees’ and has local provision met expectation including quality of life factors?

  4. Limited studies in this area • Andrea Barron, Hassiotis et al (2011) • Allen et al (2007) • Beadle-Brown et al (2006)

  5. OOA Cohort Profile

  6. OOA Placement Costs Box and whisker plot to show the spread of values for those returning and not returning to area.

  7. Model of OOA returnship 7. Review and refine 6. Monitor 5. Implementation 4. Agree and share ‘whole system’ strategy 3. Planning structure 2. Needs assessment 1. Stock take Source: NHS Confederation - Briefing May 2011 Issue220

  8. Lessons learnt • Data integrity has been a problem • Cohort fluidity – who’s in and who’s out? • Constraints and limitation • Nothing stays the same – key personnel and organisational change • Value of project supervision and CLAHRC Fellows teaching

  9. Emerging barriers 7. Compromised by structural change locally 6. Absence of quality assurance 5. Savings the priority? 4. Not a whole systems approach 3. Dependence on key players rather than the plan 2. Data integrity, again 1. Mapping the unknown

More Related