1 / 23

Cowen Institute Data/Accountability Overview

Cowen Institute Data/Accountability Overview. Measuring Performance. RSD created to address Academic Failure Success/Failure needs to be judged on whether or not schools are better State releases a ton of data to capture student, school and district performance. Chronology of Data Release.

toni
Télécharger la présentation

Cowen Institute Data/Accountability Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cowen InstituteData/Accountability Overview

  2. Measuring Performance • RSD created to address Academic Failure • Success/Failure needs to be judged on whether or not schools are better • State releases a ton of data to capture student, school and district performance

  3. Chronology of Data Release • 1st week of May: Release of LEAP/GEE results • State level results • District level results • School rosters • Schools determine who passes • Data Clean UP • No data available to report school level results

  4. Summer • Last week of July/1st week of August • Preliminary School Performance Scores (SPS) for any school < 60 previous year • Required by NCLB; choice/SES determined • August (1st 2 weeks) • School Level Test data released • What the TP reported Last year • Misleading- ranked by performance on ELA test

  5. Fall • SPS release (Sept-Oct) • SPS for ALL schools • AI for any 1st year schools in the RSD • Pre-Katrina, SPS release was THE story • Is the story in the rest of the state • Captures performance and growth • SPS/AI is the only release that uses all tests, all grades, in a weighted formula

  6. District Accountability • Released sometime Jan-March • Two Components • DPS: District Performance Score • District Responsibility Index

  7. District Performance Score • DPS is a “roll up” of all student data to the district level • “horse race”- all school districts compared on the same basis • Keeps the weights of School Accountability • Also gives Subgroup Performance Score • How poor/minority/special ed by district • Way to compare Pre/Post Katrina New Orleans • All schools/All kids

  8. District Responsibility Index • % of 8th graders that do not return following year • % of certified teachers and % at low performing schools • Financial Index pending

  9. School Accountability • Began in 1999 • Strong Public Acceptance • #1 ranked nationally • Consistent scoring system with some imbedded “values” • All schools included • Growth and Performance • Growth Labels and Performance Labels

  10. Assessment (CRT) Index • Advanced 200 pts. • Mastery 150 pts. • Basic 100 pts. • Approaching Basic 50 pts. • Unsatisfactory 0 pts.

  11. Converting LEAP Alternate Assessment Level 2 Scores to an Index Basic 100 pts. Approaching Basic 75 pts. Foundational 50 pts. Pre-Foundational 0 pts.

  12. K-8: SPS Calculation • Index Weighting • 90% CRT (LEAP and iLeap) • 10% Attendance (K-6) • 5% Attendance/5% Dropout (7-8) • 4th and 8th Grade still count more • 3rd grade ELA counts more

  13. K-8 Weighting

  14. Incentive Points • Students repeating 4th and 8th grade LEAP can earn Incentive Points for the school if they improve their achievement level in summer or spring retesting • 50 incentive points are awarded for each subject that the student improves by one or more levels (only get points one time per student per subject)

  15. High School Accountability • Implementing New Model • Adds the Graduation Index • Takes 5 years to collect data • Hurricane Impacted Schools (do-over) will not be fully integrated into the model for at least 5 years

  16. Index Weights- High School

  17. Accounting for Dropouts • Included as “0” in Graduation Index • Dropout Adjustment to High School Test Scores (CRT index) • Gives schools a “0” for any drop out above 4% annual rate, by grade • Was 7% pre-Katrina • Schools with less than 4% drop out “ rewarded” • Without dropout adjustment, school scores would be higher as a result of testing selectively fewer and fewer students

  18. Two Types of SPS Growth SPS– a score, from 1 year of data, that determines a school’s growth Baseline SPS– a score, based on 2 years of data, that determines a school’s status

  19. Performance Labels

  20. Growth Labels

  21. Value Added • Louisiana does not have a value added accountability model • US Ed does not allow a true value added model under NCLB • True value added will measure how much growth a student had in a year and judge schools on “same child” growth • LA’s model compares cohorts- how does this year’s 4th grade compare to last year’s 4th grade • Only way to have a value added model is if the stte adopts one; waited to see what changes happen in NCLB • Aligned the tests (iLeap and Leap) so one can measure

  22. Other Data Points: • LDE is good with Data • Recognized as one of top 10 states • Only good source of school data, where consistent definitions and reporting requirements are established • Teachers • Numbers; certification; salaries • Student info- MFP report • Finances: • Districts, Type 5’s and Type 2’s

More Related