1 / 14

Boards of Appeal 2006 – examples of case law

Boards of Appeal 2006 – examples of case law. Alexandra Poch – HoS, DASS, Boards of Appeal (OHIM) Liaison Meeting – Alicante, 15 June 2007. The Boards of Appeal. Statistics 2006. Appeals filed in 2006: 1659 ex-parte: 591 inter partes: 1068 Appeals closed in 2006: 1675 ex-parte: 657

torie
Télécharger la présentation

Boards of Appeal 2006 – examples of case law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Boards of Appeal 2006 – examples of case law Alexandra Poch – HoS, DASS, Boards of Appeal (OHIM) Liaison Meeting – Alicante, 15 June 2007

  2. The Boards of Appeal

  3. Statistics 2006 • Appeals filed in 2006: 1659 • ex-parte: 591 • inter partes: 1068 • Appeals closed in 2006: 1675 • ex-parte: 657 • inter partes: 1000 • Languages: EN: 61.48%, DE: 19.95%, ES: 8.86%, FR: 6.75%, IT: 1.21%, Other: 1.75%

  4. Overview • Decisions of the Grand Board • Restriction of goods and services • Absolute grounds for refusal • examples: Misspellings, shape of product, public policy/morality • Relative grounds for refusal • examples: Earlier mark included in CTMA • Designs

  5. Decisions of the Grand Board • R 495/2005-G of 6 July 2006 (SCREW YOU) • Article 7(1)(f) CTMR • R 856/2004-G of 10 July 2006 (3D Shape of Lego Brick) • Article 51, Article 7(1)(e) CTMR • R 331/2006-G of 27 September 2006 (OPTIMA) • Article 44(1) CTMR

  6. Restriction of goods & services • Express and unconditional • R 751/2006-2 of 20 September 2006 (VASCULAR WRAP); • R 162/2005-1 of 17 January 2006 (SOLUTION/BI-SOLUTION BS) • “Negative restrictions” – limiting goods and services in so far as they do not possess a particular characteristic • R 746/2005-4 of 31 March 2006 (TIKKA TIKKA) • Other restrictions, e.g. way the goods are sold • R 556/2005-1 of 3 February 2006 (ZELOXZAR/ZELDOX)

  7. Absolute grounds for refusal (1) • Article 7(1)(b),(c) CTMR: Misspellings • R 352/2005-4 of 7 March 2006 (FRESHHH) • R 374/2005-1 of 30 January 2006 (exsellent) • R 782/2006-1 of 22 November 2006 (XPERT)

  8. Absolute grounds for refusal (2) • Shape of product • Article 7(1)(b) CTMR: • R 724/2006-2 of 22 November 2006 (3D Pet Shelter) • Article 7(1)(e)(ii) CTMR: • R 856/2004-G of 10 July 2006 (3D Shape of Lego Brick); • R 1/2005-4 of 11 January 2006 (3D Hilti-Koffer)

  9. Absolute grounds for refusal (3) • Article 7(1)(f) CTMR: Public policy/morality • R 495/2005-G (SCREW YOU) • R 558/2006-2 (REVA) • R 356/2005-4 (Erotik Lounge)

  10. Relative grounds for refusal (1) • Earlier mark included in CTMA • Likelihood of confusion: • R 823/2005-4 of 9 October 2006 (SinnLeffers/Sinn) • R 268/2005-4 of 18 October 2006 (FOCUS Radio/Focus)

  11. Relative grounds for refusal (2) • Earlier mark included in CTMA • No likelihood of confusion: • R 94/2003-4 of 17 January 2006 (BIO KAIKU/BIO) • R 566/2002-2 of 11 May 2006 (VICTORIA VOGUE/Vogue)

  12. Designs • R 1001/2005-3 of 27 October 2006(METAL RAPPERS) • R 196/2006-3 of 22 November 2006(Underwater Motive Device) • R 216/2005-3 of 8 November 2006(CAFETERA)

  13. Further information Case-law of the Boards of Appeal http://oami.europa.eu/search/LegalDocs/la/en_BoA_index.cfm

  14. Information:  (+ 34) 965 139 764  (+ 34) 965 139 928  alexandra.poch@oami.europa.eu  Documentation and Support Service Boards of Appeal Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Avenida de Europa, 4 E-03008 Alicante SPAIN

More Related