1 / 17

Mandarin Chinese Speech Recognition

Mandarin Chinese Speech Recognition. Mandarin Chinese. Tonal language (inflection matters!) 1 st tone – High, constant pitch (Like saying “aaah”) 2 nd tone – Rising pitch (“Huh?”) 3 rd tone – Low pitch (“ugh”) 4 th tone – High pitch with a rapid descent (“No!”)

tory
Télécharger la présentation

Mandarin Chinese Speech Recognition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mandarin ChineseSpeech Recognition

  2. Mandarin Chinese • Tonal language (inflection matters!) • 1st tone – High, constant pitch (Like saying “aaah”) • 2nd tone – Rising pitch (“Huh?”) • 3rd tone – Low pitch (“ugh”) • 4th tone – High pitch with a rapid descent (“No!”) • “5th tone” – Neutral used for de-emphasized syllables • Monosyllabic language • Each character represents a single base syllable and tone • Most words consist of 1, 2, or 4 characters • Heavily contextual language

  3. Mandarin Chinese and Speech Processing • Accoustic representations of Chinese syllables • Structural Form • (consonant) + vowel + (consonant)

  4. Mandarin Chinese and Speech Processing • Phone Sets • Initial/final phones [1] • e.g. Shi, ge, zi = (shi + ib), (ge + e), (z + if) • Initial phones: unvoiced • 1 phone • Final phones: voiced (tone 1-5) • Can consist of multiple phones

  5. Mandarin Chinese and Speech Processing • Strong tonal recognition is crucial to distinguish between homonyms [3] (especially w/o context) • Creating tone models is difficult • Discontinuities exist in the F0 contour between voiced and unvoiced regions

  6. Prosody Prosody: “the rhythmic and intonational aspect of language” [2] Embedded Tone Modeling[4] Explicit Tone Modeling[4]

  7. Tone Modeling Embedded Tone Modeling Tonal acoustic units are joined with spectral features at each frame [4] Explicit Tone Modeling Tone recognition is completed independently and combined after post-processing [4]

  8. Pitch, energy, and duration (Prosody) combined with lexical and syntactic features improves tonal labeling Coarticulation Variations in syllables can cause variations in tone: Bu4 + Dui4 = Bu2 Dui4 (wrong) Ni3 + Hao3 = Ni2 Hao3 (hello) Tone Modeling

  9. Emebedded Tone Modeling:Two Stream ModelingNi, Liu, Xu Spectral Stream –MFCC’s (Mel frequency cepstral coefficients) Describe vocal tract information Distinctive for phones (short time duration) Pitch/Tone Stream – requires smoothing Describe vibrations of the vocal chords Independent of Spectral features d/dt(pitch) aka tone and d2/dt2(pitch) are added Embedded in an entire syllable Affected by coarticulation (requires a longer time window) – i.e. Sandhi Tone – context dependency

  10. Embedded Tone Modeling:Two Stream Modeling [4] Tonal Identification Features F0 Energy Duration Coarticulation (cont. speech) Initially use 2 stream embedded model followed by explicit modeling during lattice rescoring (alignment?) Explicit tone modeling uses max. entropy framework [4] (discriminative model)

  11. Explicit Tone Modeling [4]

  12. Other Work Chang, Zhou, Di, Huang, & Lee [1] • 3 Methods • Powerful Language Model (no tone modeling) • CER = 7.32% • Embedded 2 Stream • Tone Stream + Feature Stream • CER = 6.43% • Embedded 1 Stream • Developed Pitch extractor • pitch track added to feature vector • CER = 6.03%

  13. Other WorkQian, Soong [3] • F0 contour smoothing • Multi-Space Distribution (MSD) • Models 2 prob. Spaces • Unvoiced: Discrete • Voiced (F0 Contour): Continuous

  14. Other WorkLamel, Gauvain, Le, Oparin, Meng [6] • Multi-Layer Perceptron Features • Combined with MFCC’s and Pitch features • Compare Language Models • N-Gram: Back-off Language Model • Neural Network Language Model • Language Model Adaptation

  15. Other WorkO. Kalinli [7] • Replace prosodic features with biologically inspired auditory attention cues • Cochlear filtering, inner hair cell, etc. • Other features are extracted from the auditory spectrum • Intensity • Frequency contrast • Temporal contrast • Orientation (phase)

  16. Other WorkQian, Xu, Soong [8] • Cross-Lingual Voice Transformation • Phonetic mapping between languages • Difficult for Mandarin and English • Very different prosodic features

  17. References [1] Eric Chang, Jianlai Zhou, Shuo Di, Chao Huang, & Kai-fu Li, “Large Vocabulary Mandarin Speech Recognition with different Approached in Modeling Tones” [2] Meriam-Webster Dictionary, http://www.merriam-webster.com/ [3] Yao Qian & Frank Soong, “A Multispace Distribution (MSD) and Two Stream Tone Modeling Approach to Mandarin Speech Recognition”, Science Direct, 2009 [4]Chongjia Ni, Wenju Liu, & Bo Xu, “Improved Large vocabulary Mandarin Speech Recognition using Prosodic and Lexical Information in Maximum Entropy Framework” [5] Yi Liu & Pascale Fung, “Pronunciation Modeling for Spontaneous Mandarin Speech Recognition”, International Journal of Speech Technology, 2004 [6] Lori Lamel, J.L. Gauvain, V.B. Le, I. Oparin, S. Meng, “Improved Models For Mandarin Speech to Text Transcription, ICASSP, 2011 [7] O. Kalinli, “Tone and Pitch Accent Classification Using Auditory Attention Cues”, ICASSP, 2011

More Related