1 / 19

IMT-Advanced Opening Report

Name. Company. Address. Phone. email. bkraemer@. marvell. .com. Bruce Kraemer. Marvell. 5488 Marvell Ln. +1. -. 321. -. 4. 27. -. Santa Clara, CA . 4098. 95054. dengwer@nortel.com. Darwin Engwer. Nortel. 4655 Great America . +1. -. 408. -. 495. -. Networks.

toshi
Télécharger la présentation

IMT-Advanced Opening Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Name Company Address Phone email bkraemer@ marvell .com Bruce Kraemer Marvell 5488 Marvell Ln +1 - 321 - 4 27 - Santa Clara, CA 4098 95054 dengwer@nortel.com Darwin Engwer Nortel 4655 Great America +1 - 408 - 495 - Networks Pkwy, Santa Clara 2588 CA 95054 IMT-Advanced Opening Report Authors: Date: 2008-01-14 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  2. Admin Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  3. Attendance • http://newton • Register • Indicate attendance • See documents 11-08-0058, 11-08-0016 and 11-08-0017 for more details. Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  4. Highlights of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards • Participants have a duty to tell the IEEE if they know (based on personal awareness) of potentially Essential Patent Claims they or their employer own • Participants are encouraged to tell the IEEE if they know of potentially Essential Patent Claims owned by others • This encouragement is particularly strong as the third party may not be a participant in the standards process • Working Group required to request assurance • Early assurance is encouraged • Terms of assurance shall be either: • Reasonable and nondiscriminatory, with or without monetary compensation; or, • A statement of non-assertion of patent rights • Assurances • Shall be provided on the IEEE-SA Standards Board approved LOA form • May optionally include not-to-exceed rates, terms, and conditions • Shall not be circumvented through sale or transfer of patents • Shall be brought to the attention of any future assignees or transferees • Shall apply to Affiliates unless explicitly excluded • Are irrevocable once submitted and accepted • Shall be supplemented if Submitter becomes aware of other potential Essential Patent Claims • A “Blanket Letter of Assurance” may be provided at the option of the patent holder • A patent holder has no duty to perform a patent search • Full policy available at http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 1 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  5. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards 6.2 Policy IEEE standards may be drafted in terms that include the use of Essential Patent Claims. If the IEEE receives notice that a [Proposed] IEEE Standard may require the use of a potential Essential Patent Claim, the IEEE shall request licensing assurance, on the IEEE Standards Board approved Letter of Assurance form, from the patent holder or patent applicant. The IEEE shall request this assurance without coercion. The Submitter of the Letter of Assurance may, after Reasonable and Good Faith Inquiry, indicate it is not aware of any Patent Claims that the Submitter may own, control, or have the ability to license that might be or become Essential Patent Claims. If the patent holder or patent applicant provides an assurance, it should do so as soon as reasonably feasible in the standards development process. This assurance shall be provided prior to the Standards Board’s approval of the standard. This assurance shall be provided prior to a reaffirmation if the IEEE receives notice of a potential Essential Patent Claim after the standard’s approval or a prior reaffirmation. An asserted potential Essential Patent Claim for which an assurance cannot be obtained (e.g., a Letter of Assurance is not provided or the Letter of Assurance indicates that assurance is not being provided) shall be referred to the Patent Committee. A Letter of Assurance shall be either: a) A general disclaimer to the effect that the Submitter without conditions will not enforce any present or future Essential Patent Claims against any person or entity making, using, selling, offering to sell, importing, distributing, or implementing a compliant implementation of the standard; or b) A statement that a license for a compliant implementation of the standard will be made available to an unrestricted number of applicants on a worldwide basis without compensation or under reasonable rates, with reasonable terms and conditions that are demonstrably free of any unfair discrimination. At its sole option, the Submitter may provide with its assurance any of the following: (i) a not-to-exceed license fee or rate commitment, (ii) a sample license agreement, or (iii) one or more material licensing terms. 2 read Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  6. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards Copies of an Accepted LOA may be provided to the working group, but shall not be discussed, at any standards working group meeting. The Submitter and all Affiliates (other than those Affiliates excluded in a Letter of Assurance) shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights in any Essential Patent Claims that are the subject of such Letter of Assurance that they hold, control, or have the ability to license with the intent of circumventing or negating any of the representations and commitments made in such Letter of Assurance. The Submitter of a Letter of Assurance shall agree (a) to provide notice of a Letter of Assurance either through a Statement of Encumbrance or by binding any assignee or transferee to the terms of such Letter of Assurance; and (b) to require its assignee or transferee to (i) agree to similarly provide such notice and (ii) to bind its assignees or transferees to agree to provide such notice as described in (a) and (b). This assurance shall apply to the Submitter and its Affiliates except those Affiliates the Submitter specifically excludes on the relevant Letter of Assurance. If, after providing a Letter of Assurance to the IEEE, the Submitter becomes aware of additional Patent Claim(s) not already covered by an existing Letter of Assurance that are owned, controlled, or licensable by the Submitter that may be or become Essential Patent Claim(s) for the same IEEE Standard but are not the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance, then such Submitter shall submit a Letter of Assurance stating its position regarding enforcement or licensing of such Patent Claims. For the purposes of this commitment, the Submitter is deemed to be aware if any of the following individuals who are from, employed by, or otherwise represent the Submitter have personal knowledge of additional potential Essential Patent Claims, owned or controlled by the Submitter, related to a [Proposed] IEEE Standard and not already the subject of a previously submitted Letter of Assurance: (a) past or present participants in the development of the [Proposed] IEEE Standard, or (b) the individual executing the previously submitted Letter of Assurance. 3 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  7. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards The assurance is irrevocable once submitted and accepted and shall apply, at a minimum, from the date of the standard's approval to the date of the standard's withdrawal. The IEEE is not responsible for identifying Essential Patent Claims for which a license may be required, for conducting inquiries into the legal validity or scope of those Patent Claims, or for determining whether any licensing terms or conditions are reasonable or non-discriminatory. Nothing in this policy shall be interpreted as giving rise to a duty to conduct a patent search. No license is implied by the submission of a Letter of Assurance. In order for IEEE’s patent policy to function efficiently, individuals participating in the standards development process: (a) shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of the holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware and that are not already the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance, owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents; and (b) should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims that are not already the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance. 4 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  8. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss fixing product prices, allocation of customers, or dividing sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object. --------------------------------------------------------------- If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt 5 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  9. Technical Discussion Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  10. IMT AHC Basic Objectives • Provide status information regarding ITU plans to 802.11 • In cooperation with other 802 WGs, encourage participation in the creation of output documents to ITU • For more details see also prior reports: • IMT Advanced Report 11-07-2140r4 • IMT Advanced Report 11-07-2500r0 • IMT Advanced Status 11-07-2788r2 • IMT Advanced Report 11-07-2928r0 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  11. Short History • ITU-R WP8F has an initiative underway to identify air interfaces for inclusion in IMT-Advanced • Question ITU-R 229/8 then M.1645 “Framework and overall objectivesof the future development of IMT‑2000 and systems beyond IMT‑2000” • Nomadic/ local area class targets 1 Gbps with low mobility! • IMT-Advanced Technical Requirements are nearly complete • Spectrum –requested in WRC07 Agenda Item 1.4 (2007-10-22 - 2007-11-16) • Technical (radio) requirements only other unfinished work item • ITU-R Circular Letter soliciting solutions due out March 2008 • Commercial deployment of IMT-Advanced expected around 2012 • IEEE 802 submitted suggestions on IMT Tech to WP8F (mid May 2007) • Contributions included from .11, .16, .18, .19, .20, .21 • WP8F review in Kyoto (end of May) • IEEE 802 held additional teleconferences between Sep-Nov 2007 and submitted additional suggestions on IMT Tech to WG18 on 2007-10-29. Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  12. Work continues in WP8F WP5D • ITU-R is restructuring its project activities • All IMT activities are to be undertaken by WP5D (note the new name) • IMT • IMT-Advanced • The final draft from this WP5D correspondence group will form the basis of the report from this group into 23rd meeting of WP8F on 2008-01-28 in Geneva, which will generate the circular letter (Invitation to submit technical proposals). • A schedule of ITU meetings can be found at • http://www.itu.int/events/upcomingevents.asp?lang=en&sector=ITU-R Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  13. Update on ITU-R Activities (2007-11-11) • RA approved the update of ITU-R Rec. M.1457 • Defines ITM-2000 “family” of technologies • That family now includes 802.16e • RA adopted new naming convention for 3G/4G mobile • The name “IMT” is an umbrella that includes • IMT-2000 – 3G (technologies contained in M.1457) • IMT-Advanced – 4G (technology/technologies not yet defined) • Spectrum identified by a WRC will be for IMT • Can be used by all IMT technologies Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  14. Update on ITU-R Activities (2007-11-11) • The new SG is of interest to IEEE 802 • Combined SG8 (Mobile Services) and SG9 (Fixed Services) as SG5 (Terrestrial Services) • SG 5 has 4 proposed/interim WPs • WP5A – Land mobile excluding IMT • WP5B – Maritime and Aeronautical Mobile, Radiolocation • WP5C – Fixed services including HF • WP5D – Land mobile (IMT) • Proposed meeting schedule for January/February 2008 is retained • WP5D will meet in Geneva starting 2008-01-28 • SG5 meets 2008-02-19 through 2008-02-20 to decide final meeting dates and chairs Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  15. Update on ITU-R Activities (2007-11-15)and Resolution 224 • WRC-07: meeting • More than 2800 delegates attended • 164 administrations represented (out of 193) • Allocations resulting from the meeting: • 450 – 470 MHz globally; individual administrations to decide • 698 – 806 MHz for the Americas and China, Korea, India, Japan, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Bangladesh and Singapore • 790 – 862 MHz for Europe and other Region 1 and 3 countries • 2300 – 2400 MHz globally • 3400 – 4200 MHz variously identified for IMT or mobile service • Previously identified spectrum for IMT-2000 (and IMT Advanced too): • 1885 – 2025, 2110 – 2200 MHz (“UMTS” band per WARC-1992) • 2500 – 2690 MHz (per WRC-2000) • 806 – 960 MHz, 1710 – 2010, 2110 – 2170 MHz (effectively all of the existing 1G, 2G and 3G spectrum) Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  16. Radio Assembly 07 (Oct 15-19, 2007) • Resolution ITU-R 56 • New Functional Alignment • All Spectrum shared for IMT-2000 and IMT-Advanced IMT IMT-Advanced IMT-2000 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  17. Annotated M.1645 Diagram Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  18. January Session Goals for 802.11 IMT AHC • One meeting time slot: Tues PM2 • Report new spectrum allocations from WRC 07 • Review current status of IEEE 802 joint inputs to IMT • R07-WP5D-C-0003!!MSW-E.doc (Report and output of correspondence group on IMT.TECH) Note: This shows that the IEEE 802 inputs have not yet been incorporated. • R07-WP5D-C-0004!!MSW-E-1.doc (update on IMT Circular Letter status ) • 802.18 interactions wrt IMT Advanced • This week’s 802.18 agenda is flexible and dynamic • Multiple drop in visits may be required • Mainly 802.18 will be considering how to deal with the IMT Circular Letter when it arrives in March 2008 • Wait for IMT Advanced CL to be issued • CL is expected by March 2008 • Planning around what to do once we receive it? Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

  19. IMT AHC Goals – Now thru March end • No conference calls planned between now and March Plenary • Goal is 2 or 3 slots for IMT discussions in March Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

More Related