210 likes | 348 Vues
The California Pedestrian Safety Assessments Program aims to improve pedestrian safety through a systematic approach. This presentation covers the comprehensive PSA process, highlighting essential phases: Pre-Visit with data collection, Site Visit involving walk audits and preliminary recommendations, and Post-Visit where final reports are generated. Included are insightful case studies from various settings, such as school areas and transit stations, and key lessons learned emphasizing collaboration, participation from multiple departments, and the importance of concept graphics. This framework offers valuable strategies for successful pedestrian safety improvements.
E N D
The California Pedestrian Safety Assessments Program ITE Western ConferenceJune 26, 2012 Matt Benjamin, Associate Fehr & Peers m.benjamin@fehrandpeers.com
Presentation Overview • PSA Process • Case Studies (recent PSAs) • Keys to Success / Lessons Learned
PSA Process Insert web screen grab
PSA Process • Phase 1: Pre-Visit • Data collection • Phone interview • Phase 2: Site Visit • Walk audits • Preliminary recommendations • Phase 3: Post-Visit • Final report
Pre-Visit Questionnaire/data request
Pre-Visit Collision Data / OTS Rankings
Pre-Visit + Phone Interview Draft Benchmarking Section
Site Visit Participant Packet
Site Visit Mark-Up Aerials with Recommendations
Post-Visit Finalize focus area recommendations Draft report Submit draft report to Tech Transfer Tech Transfer sends to Applicant
Post-Visit Finalize site-specific improvement suggestions
Tech Transfer is owner, applicant receives a copy • In-house reference • Not intended for formal adoption • Can be incorporated into General Plan, Pedestrian Master Plan, etc. • Grant applications (SRTS/SR2S, Regional CFP) Post-Visit
Case Studies School Area
Case Studies Transit Station / Commercial District
Case Studies Major Bus Corridor / Transit Agency Lead
Case Studies Challenging Crossing
Case Studies Restaurant / Nightlife District
Lessons Learned • Elements for success • Concurrent with other planning effort (General Plan update, ped/bike plan) • Site improvements can be linked to upcoming grant cycle (safe routes,etc) • Participation from multiple departments and decision makers • Wheelchair user attends site visit
Lessons Learned • Evaluators can help focus efforts • Concept graphics are key motivator (vision / funding) • Update benchmarks to keep up with current trends/research • Coordinate with other ped safety efforts at state/federal level • Follow up/evaluation is needed