1 / 20

Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle

Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle. Introduction. Taxonomy / “How”. Business strategy / “Why”. Antitrust. Student presentations Guest discussion re USB. IPR: RAND v. RF. IPR(+): “Openness”. IPR: Patent pools. Policy: private stnds & law.

tracy
Télécharger la présentation

Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle

  2. Introduction Taxonomy / “How” Business strategy / “Why” Antitrust Student presentations Guest discussion re USB IPR: RAND v. RF IPR(+): “Openness” IPR: Patent pools Policy: private stnds & law Policy: Role of government Case study: China Student presentations Student presentations * 3/22 3/29 4/5 4/12 4/19 4/26

  3. Everyone loves “open standards”!

  4. … but we can’t agree what they are

  5. ITU http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/othergroups/ipr-adhoc/openstandards.html

  6. . . . ANSI http://publicaa.ansi.org/sites/apdl/Documents/Standards%20Activities/Critical%20Issues/Open%20Standards/CIP-OpenStandards.doc

  7. http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/21/05/T21050000050010MSWE.dochttp://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/21/05/T21050000050010MSWE.doc

  8. Tsilas http://www.ijclp.net/files/ijclp_web-doc_8-10-2005.pdf

  9. Krechmer http://www.csrstds.com/openstds.pdf

  10. http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=19529

  11. Perens http://perens.com/OpenStandards/Definition.html

  12. Rosen http://www.rosenlaw.com/DefiningOpenStandards.pdf

  13. Ghosh http://www.intgovforum.org/Substantive_1st_IGF/openstandards-IGF.pdf

  14. DeNardis (“maximal openness” definition) http://www.ijclp.net/files/ijclp_web-doc_9-13-2009.pdf

  15. Closed: a specification developed by a single company with no avenue for participation by other parties. The spec is unavailable for other parties to use, even for a fee, to develop interoperable products based on the specification. The spec developer owns all the IPR and does not license it under any terms. Maximal openness DeNardis http://www.ijclp.net/files/ijclp_web-doc_9-13-2009.pdf

  16. ‘Conservative’ views: procedural due process, RAND IPR Open source-centric views: open participation, RF IPR ‘A2K-centric’ views: non-traditional innovation arguments, political and economic emphasis

  17. Standards Setting Organizations (SSOs) Consortia (sometimes “SIGs”) “A collaboration of stakeholders with the common goal of the standardization of a specific technology or application” Formal, recognized standards development orgs (SDOs) International “Big I” or “FISDOs”: ITU, ISO, IEC, JTC1 [“Little I”: e.g. ASTM, IEEE] Special Interest Groups (SIGs) “focus on a single standard for a specific technology or industry” “[usually] limited to development and possibly promotion” “generally short-lived” Alliances “develop multiple related standards for a technology” “may offer… logo and certification programs, marketing…” “life cycle may be relatively long” Regional e.g. ETSI, COPANT MIXED RAND/RF; MIXED PROCEDURAL OPENNESS National Coordination bodies: e.g. CESI, ANSI Accredited SSOs: e.g. TIA, INCITS, NEMA, SAE  Develop “Specifications”  Develop “Standards” GENERALLY RAND, PROCEDURALLY ‘OPEN’ -Based on taxonomy described in IPO Standards Primer (Sept. 2009)

  18. Exercise: where do some of these familiar SIGs/SDOs fall on DeNardis’ scale? Maximal openness Closed

More Related