1 / 25

The Measurement and Assessment of Educational Quality

The Measurement and Assessment of Educational Quality. John Gatta, Ph.D. President. National and State Context. National and State Context. Race to the Top. NCLB. PERA and SB7. Common Core. Achievement Growth versus Achievement Status. Status. Growth. Educational Quality Under

trisha
Télécharger la présentation

The Measurement and Assessment of Educational Quality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Measurement and Assessment of Educational Quality John Gatta, Ph.D. President

  2. National and State Context

  3. National and State Context Race to the Top NCLB PERA and SB7 Common Core

  4. Achievement Growth versus Achievement Status Status Growth

  5. Educational Quality Under No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

  6. Quality Under NCLB

  7. Redefining Quality Federal and State Policy Shifts

  8. Race to the Top “I am issuing a challenge to our nation’s governors and school boards, principals and teachers, businesses and non-profits, parents and students: if you set and enforce rigorous and challenging standards and assessments; if you put outstanding teachers at the front of the classroom; if you turn around failing schools – your state can win a Race to the Top grant.” President Barack ObamaJuly 24, 2009

  9. Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA) In 2010, Gov. Pat Quinn signed the Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA). PERA requires all schools in Illinois to incorporate measures of student growth into principal and teacher evaluation systems.

  10. Illinois Senate Bill 7 (SB 7) In 2011, Governor Quinn signed into law Senate Bill 7. SB7 connects teacher hiring and dismissal to teacher performance.

  11. Illinois NCLB Waiver No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the most recent authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), is the principal federal law affecting education from kindergarten through high school. On September 23, 2011, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) invited states educational agencies to request flexibility on behalf of itself, its districts, and schools, in order to better focus on improving student learning and increasing the quality of instruction. Illinois' flexibility request was initially submitted on February 28, 2012 and resubmitted on January 31, 2014, was granted on April 18, 2014. - ISBE Website

  12. NCLB Waivers Nationally

  13. Illinois NCLB Waiver Multiple Measures Index

  14. Higher Achievement Standards NOTE: More Rigorous Standards Imposed in 2013

  15. Achievement Gaps Remain Major National and State Focus Percentage of District 23 students meeting or exceeding 2014 ISAT across subgroups and subjects

  16. Educational Progress ISBE Growth Value Tables

  17. Educational Progress District 23 Performance on Growth Value Tables (2013)

  18. Performance in Context (Adjusted Status) • Adjusted status compares the performance of each district and school to a state benchmark after adjusting for student characteristics that may impact district outcomes. ISAT data from the 2013-2014 school year were evaluated to determine how District 23 district-level and school-level achievement compared to district-level and school-level achievement across the state after adjusting for district characteristics. • The following characteristics were accounted for in the adjusted status model: ·         District-type (e.g., unit), ·         District enrollment, ·         Percentage race/ethnicity, ·         Percentage Limited English Proficiency (LEP), ·         Percentage low-income, ·         Percentage mobility, ·         Geographic location (e.g., Chicagoland), ·         Equalized Assessed Value (EAV).

  19. Performance in Context (Adjusted Status) District 23 Prospect Heights Adjusted Status (2013) *Based on criteria students in district for one year

  20. Defining Quality at the Local District Level

  21. What is your definition of quality? Developing a District Dashboard

  22. Local Academic Growth

  23. Local Academic Growth

  24. 2014-2015 Priorities • Continue to support administration with data analysis and new portal resources • Work with administration to develop the district dashboard aligned to the district’s definition of quality • Develop individual student profile reports aligned to the dashboard

  25. Questions?

More Related