1 / 79

寬頻發展趨勢 “ Building Metro Networks” Offering Ethernet Services

寬頻發展趨勢 “ Building Metro Networks” Offering Ethernet Services. 中興大學九十一年度 區網中心研討會. Extreme Networks 極進網路台灣分公司 錢旭光 . 陳瑞建. Agenda. Extreme Way Broadband Network Trends Metro Area Network How to build an MAN MAN Technologies Q & A. The Extreme Way. Delivering the Most Effective

trista
Télécharger la présentation

寬頻發展趨勢 “ Building Metro Networks” Offering Ethernet Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 寬頻發展趨勢“Building Metro Networks”Offering Ethernet Services 中興大學九十一年度 區網中心研討會 Extreme Networks 極進網路台灣分公司 錢旭光 . 陳瑞建

  2. Agenda • Extreme Way • Broadband Network Trends • Metro Area Network • How to build an MAN • MAN Technologies • Q & A

  3. The Extreme Way Delivering the Most Effective Applications Infrastructure

  4. The Extreme Way: A Networking Success Story We founded Extreme Networks in 1996 because networks were slow, expensive and complex – and nobody was doing anything about it We built some of the largest networks in the world: Compaq, Microsoft and Shell We led the silicon switching revolution by making networks that are simpler, faster and less expensive.

  5. An International Company From Day One More than 50% of revenues come from outside the US Offices in over 25 countries 24/7 customer support based on three continents

  6. Outstanding Financial Performance One of the fastest growing companies in Silicon Valley history

  7. Financial Performance: Business Mix

  8. Q1 Calendar Year 2002 – January - March 2002 Worldwide Layer 3 Total Port Share (10/100/1000 Ethernet) Worldwide Layer 3 Fast Ethernet Port Share Worldwide Layer 3 Gigabit Ethernet Port Share Avaya 1.7% Alcatel 3.9% Avaya 2.1% Avaya 2.2% Others 8.3% Others 7.2% Others 9.6% Extreme 15.3% 3Com 3.7% Riverstone 3.9% Extreme 27.4% Extreme 31.3% Alcatel 5.2% Alcatel 4.9% Enterasys 5.7% Riverstone 5.4% Riverstone 5.3% Foundry 7.1% Nortel 7.9% Nortel 8.0% Cisco 31.5% Nortel 9.0% Foundry 10.0% Foundry 9.2% Cisco 18.4% Enterasys 15.0% Cisco 13.4% 3Com 15.6% Enterasys 12.7% Financial Performance: Market Share

  9. Calendar Year 2001 Worldwide Layer 3 Total Port Share (10/100/1000 Ethernet) Worldwide Layer 3 Fast Ethernet Port Share Worldwide Layer 3 Gigabit Ethernet Port Share 3Com 1.0% Avaya 1.8% Avaya 1.8% Avaya 1.6% Others 7.5% Others 7.9% Others 10.4% Extreme 23.0% Riverstone 5.2% Extreme 27.0% Riverstone 5.5% Extreme 28.1% 3Com 3.9% Alcatel 6.1% Riverstone 5.3% Alcatel 6.1% Alcatel 6.5% Cisco 8.7% Cisco 9.8% Nortel 15.1% Cisco 9.1% Foundry 10.2% Enterasys 18.8% Foundry 10.4% Enterasys 20.1% Foundry 12.1% Nortel 11.8% Enterasys 13.0% Nortel 12.1% Financial Performance: Market Share

  10. The Value Of The Extreme Way

  11. The Value Of The Extreme Way

  12. The Value Of The Extreme Way

  13. The Extreme Product Family Summit

  14. It’s Going To Be One Big Networked World…

  15. The Extreme Future We believe Extreme’s Ethernet Everywhere vision is the future of global networking Our ultimate goal is to be an integral part of the world’s communications system Extreme is creating a future of easily deployed, highly scalable, intelligently managed, ubiquitous applications infrastructure

  16. Broadband Network Trend

  17. Broadband Network Trends • 80% of traffic is data and doubling every 12 months • Broadband networks must evolve from voice to data optimized • Demand for more speed, lower price, better service • Plenty of alternatives technologies and players • 10G, xDSL, Wireless and IXCs, ILECs, NAPs, CLECs • Metro fiber and 10G/WDM removes the bandwidth barrier • Glut will drive prices down, CLECs must reduce costs • IP and Ethernet each eclipsing rivals in Metro Network Ethernet MAN

  18. What’s a Metro Area Network (MAN) • High-capacity fiber backbone covering metro area • Typically runs on SONET ring or dual ring • Usually multiple interconnected rings • Utilizes fiber owned or leased by Service Provider • Cost breakdown different from long haul networks • Long haul: 70% fiber, 30% equipment • Metro area: 30% fiber, 70% equipment * • Backbone equipment is very strategic investment for Metro Area Network service providers * Source: Banc Robertson Stevens 1999

  19. Central Office • SONET/SDH core • Multi-protocol • High reliability • Bandwidth guarantees • Predictable latency • Very expensive • Hard to change • Voice optimized • Inefficient for data T1 T3 Level 3 n Gigabit Local ring PublicPeering Sub Gb Local ring Typical MAN Architecture Other MetroRegions Off Net Qwest Multi-Gigabit Metro Ring SONET On Net

  20. Who Are The Metro Players • Metro Service Providers • Typically Regional CLECs (Tier 2) and ILECs • Sell retail bandwidth and services to Enterprises • Sell wholesale bandwidth and services to CLECs and ISPs • IXCs, NAPs, Next Generation Carriers • Offering wholesale long haul transport between regions • Municipalities, Utilities • Offering wholesale dark fiber leasing to CLECs and ILECs

  21. Metro Provider Business Strategy • Metro bandwidth at unprecedented price points • Disruptive price point for high-bandwidth customers • Faster deployment and flexible control of bandwidth • Within same metro and long distance between metros • Large / medium Enterprises and Tier 3 CLEC/ISPs • Inter-connecting enterprise LANs and SP POPs • Providing wholesales and retail Internet access

  22. Metro Provider Network Strategy • IP centric network and product strategy • IP/Ethernet hand-off to customers • Via switch at customer premises or co-lo facility • Own as much of the backbone as possible • Purchase or long term lease of metro dark fiber • Own backbone equipment, customer located equipment (CLE) • Lease wholesale bandwidth for long haul

  23. Ethernet Metro Market Drivers • Enterprise Networks Outsourcing Data Services • IT shifting network build-out to Metro providers • High bandwidth applications (storage, Backup, ..) across the Metro, double traffic every 1~2 years • Existing Metro technologies (TDM) are NOT data optimized • Legacy networks are built for voice • Difficult to scale to support high bandwidth services • Better Economics for delivering high bandwidth services • Delivering “just in time” bandwidth • Faster return on investment

  24. L2/L3 Switches Ethernet Aggregation BGP, IP Services IP Routers Data QoS/Traffic Engineering ATM Switches TDM Pipes SONET ADMs Transport More Bandwidth WDM Fiber The Metro Today

  25. The Shortcomings of SONET/SDH • SONET is TDM based - optimized for voice not data • Complex and expensive, designed for multi-protocol • Uses point to point circuits - difficult to provision • Meticulous management of available channels • Long-lead times to enable, change, or upgrade • No granularity - bandwidth comes in big increments • Burn a whole 45Mbps channel to deliver 10Mbps • Can multiplex customers onto full channel but costs • Requires ATM and adds more routing complexity

  26. Ethernet Aggregation, BGP, IP Services, QoS, MPLS, IP TDM More Bandwidth Data + Transport SONET Lite/WDM Packet Pipes, Some Data Handling, More Bandwidth Transport + Data Ethernet IP Switch Routers WDM/Optical Bypass Fiber The Metro Is Evolving

  27. IP/Ethernet Technical Advantage • Ethernet now extends from MAN to building • Over any MAN/WAN and in-building media (fiber, copper, air) • Ethernet or IP from Gigabit MAN to customer point • No longer necessary to have a multi-protocol backbone • IP/Ethernet service model is easy to configure • VLANs enable point and multi-point connections • Ideal for interconnecting COs, POPs, branch offices (TLS) • IP routing enables efficient Internet traffic hand-off • Ideal for VPNs, content distribution, hosting services Bandwidth by the slice and policy-based QoS

  28. IP/Ethernet Business Advantage • IP / Ethernet economics means faster profitability • 80-90% saving over SONET total cost of ownership * • IP / Ethernet gives Carrier the competitive edge • Better pricing and faster deployment • More responsive with less expertise • Simpler for you and customer to manage • Allows rapid, cost-effective service provisioning * Sources: Dataquest 12/99, Yankee 12./00

  29. Ethernet Scalability Advantage Ethernet Radio Dial Provisioning 1.5 Mbps 10 Mbps 45 Mbps 100 Mbps 1 Gbps 10 Gbps OC3 STM-1(155 Mbps) OC12 STM-4 (622 Mbps) OC48 STM-16 (2.4 Gbps) OC192 STM-64 (9.6 Gbps) SONET/SDH Jagged Provisioning “Ethernet is 1/5 to 1/10 the cost of packet over sonet” Dataquest, 12/99 “Leasing of dark fiber within a metro area yields a 96% saving versus leasing a T3 service from an ILEC” Yankee 12/00

  30. Cost of T3 equivalent bandwidth Architecture Options Ethernet Economic Advantage Source: MCI Worldcom, Yipes, Dell ‘Oro, Yankee Group, Extreme Networks, Juniper Networks

  31. Ethernet Economic Advantage Source: Yipes, Dell ‘Oro, Yankee Group, Extreme Networks, Juniper NetworksAssumes a regional network with five hubs and 10 rings

  32. $45,000 $40,000 $35,000 OC-3 $30,000 OC-12 $25,000 OC-48 ASP Per Gigabit of Bandwidth $20,000 OC-192 10 GE $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Comparative Bandwidth Pricing Source: Dell’Oro, 2000

  33. Disruptive Pricing Example • Double the bandwidth, half the price • Traditional Telco price structure • T1 1.5 Mbps ~ $1,000/month • T3 45 Mbps ~ $10,000/month • Optical Ethernet price structure • 3 Mbps ~ $900/month • 100Mbps ~ $4,000/month SONET/ATM $ IP/Ethernet Megabits “Customers can buy as little or as much bandwidth as they want. It's a fantastic proposition. The potential market is huge” -- Forrester Research

  34. Market Size for GbE MAN • GbE is a new, price-disruptive technology • With enhanced Carrier-grade features (APS, QoS, Billing), GbE can have a huge upside in the market! Total Market: $25.7B Source: U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray and RHK, Inc.

  35. Retail Services Large/Medium Enterprises Transparent LAN services (TLS) ATM/FR/IP managed services High speed Internet access Voice trunks between offices Communities of interest (Extranet) Differentiated IP Services Ethernet MAN Market Segments Wholesale Services Regional ISPs, Tier 3 CLECs • Trunks between COs and POPs • POP/Data Center co-location • Aggregation of MTUs for BLECs • Content distribution services • Upstream Internet access • Region to region Interconnect Revenue split between Retail and Wholesale varies, depending on Metro provider’s main business focus

  36. Retail MAN Services • Business Internet Access • Still the largest revenue generating service • Transparent LAN Services • ‘Point to Point’ and ‘Point to Multipoint’ Connectivity • Within the Metro • Across long-haul networks • Multimedia Services • VPN - Managed Firewall • Voice - Tie-line replacement via TDMoIP • Storage - Disaster Recovery • Video - Residential and Commercial

  37. When to Use Ethernet MAN Services • Today (2001) • Bandwidth, Bandwidth, Bandwidth • LAN to LAN Connectivity, Internet Access • Where there is coverage • Tomorrow (2004) • High bandwidth WAN access • Converged multiple voice/video services Source: Mark Fabbi @ Gartner

  38. New Ethernet MAN Service Timeline Voice Transportation BW on Demand Comprehensive NSP Tiered Services Storage Services LAN-LAN 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Internet Access ASP Bundling VPN Aggregation Voice Gateways Source: Mark Fabbi @ Gartner

  39. Service/Deployment Details • VLANs • One vMAN per TLS service • Customer’s traffic is Tagged or Un-Tagged and then vMANs • One physical port per service • Topology • L2 for TLS • L3 for internet Access • Fixed Bandwidth • Min./max. bandwidth with Ingress Rate Shaping • Fixed rate billing • Starts at a min. of 10 Mbps • Other • Lin Aggregation for additional bandwidth • Support for .1p exists but not yet used • Scripted CLI for management and SNMP/Syslog monitored with Micromuse Netcool SLAs • Availability 99.95% • Packet Latency < 50ms (within Metro) • Packet Loss 0.01% • MTTR 1- 4 Hours

  40. MAN provider example - Yipes • Yipes Service offering • Providing service to 300 business customers • High speed Internet access • Regional Virtual Campus • Provide Yipes MAN, Yipes WAN, Yipes Wall services • Connects across the MAN at LAN speeds • Uses Extreme vMAN function • What Extreme Sold • 21 MANs around the US • 80 BlackDiamonds, 300 Alpines, 350 Summit 48i’s

  41. Greater China Extreme MAN • Shanxi Telecom MAN • China Mobile deals • XinJiang Mobile MAN • Sichuan Mobile MAN • China Mobile Hunan • Shandong Weifang TV & Broadcasting CATV • Chung Hwa Telecom 中華電信 • FTTB - Fiber to the building • Around the island, total more than 50 COs in CHT • Koo‘s Broadband Telecom 和網寬頻 • First MAN customer in Taiwan, started operation Aug. 01'

  42. Koos Broadband Telecom Network Diagram

  43. 網管工作站 Chung Hwa Telecom FTTB North Region 東四 北四 石牌一 1G ring 汐止 1G ring 1G 1G ring 東五 東二 1G 1G ring 1G ring 劍潭 內一 1G ring Hinet Backbone 石牌二 GESWc 江翠 1G ring 南一 BB-RAS 1G ring GESWr 1G ring 積穗 板一 南二 Hinet GigaPOP設備 1G ring

  44. Extreme’s Value Proposition Extending Ethernet Everywhere to the first mile • Simplified IP/Ethernet service model over metro fiber, and Telco access network over T1/E1, T3 WAN links • Subscriber-level provisioning and management end-to-end across a common system architecture • Simpler, quicker, more cost-effective service deployment

  45. How to build a MANEthernet MAN Technology

  46. Extreme Uniqueness for MAN Networks • Wire-speed Switching and Routing • Layer1 thru’ Layer4 packet classification • Service Level Agreements (SLA) • Bidirectional rate shaping • vMAN • Transparent LAN Services • Billing and Provisioning • $ • EAPS • Resilient Rings • Network Login • Authenticating Users

  47. Bandwidth by the Slice • Committed Information Rate (CIR) like services • Bi-directional rate shaping enables bandwidth slicing • Control traffic on egress, police traffic on ingress B I D I R E C T I O N A L Min 15Mb/s Subnet X GUARANTEED! Max 30Mb/s DiffServ Min 5Mb/s VoIP

  48. Packets Out Packets IN Packet Layer 4 Layer 3 Layer 2 Layer 1 Layer 4 Layer 3 Layer 2 Layer 1 Packet Layer Independent QoS • End-to-End Policy-Based QoS • Mapping from PB QoS and/or 802.1p to IETF Diff Serv and/or MPLS Labels =Policy QoS Profile (configured queue) Classification Qp1 - Best Effort Traffic • Ordered Hierarchy • Layer 1,2,3,4, .1p, IP DiffServ packet info 0% Min/100% Max Low Priority QpX - Essential Traffic 5% Min/100% Max Higher Priority

  49. Ethernet Switching Ethernet Everywhere IP Routing Choice of L2 and L3 Service Models • Ethernet switching in the WAN • Layer 2 model (Virtual Campus) • Ethernet encapsulation over WAN • BCP/MLPPP • VLAN aggregation • Traditional IP routing in the WAN • Layer 3 model (Internet Access) • IP encapsulation over WAN • IPCP/MLPPP • IP routed subnets • For mixed vendor environments • e.g. Interoperable with Cisco IOS

  50. The need for ‘Rate Shaping’ • Multiple customers per building/location • Bandwidth requirement differs per customer • Need to offer unique ‘tiered services’ • Bi-directional rate shaping at the edge • Application/flow based bandwidth allocation Customer #1 50 Mbps Customer #2 30 Mbps Customer #3 45 Mbps Customer #4 50 Mbps EthernetAccess/MAN Ring Customer #5 100 Mbps

More Related