210 likes | 628 Vues
PROSE vs. PROSE. What it was Why it didn’t catch on What we did about it Why it will work Who’s committed to using it. What PROSE Was: 1990 - 2000. Computerized production order Industry Standard, IdeAlliance endorsed Supported by contributors Meredith, Reader’s Digest, more... RRD
E N D
PROSE vs. PROSE What it was Why it didn’t catch on What we did about it Why it will work Who’s committed to using it
What PROSE Was: 1990 - 2000 • Computerized production order • Industry Standard, IdeAlliance endorsed • Supported by contributors • Meredith, Reader’s Digest, more... • RRD • Quad • Quebecor • Perry/Judds
...What PROSE Was • EDI Format • Electronic Data Interchange • Directly supported by Prograph • Toolbox • Magpro • Available to all vendors • Impoze, Managing Editor, Proteus
Why Didn’t It Catch On? • Ahead of its time? • Required significant changes to workflow • Not broad enough to cover all monthlies, weeklies, SIPs • “Frozen,” not easily modified • No formalized testing • Non-Database Format
Where Did it Work? • Custom Time Inc. Development • Considerable modifications to language • Proprietary Trading-Partner deployment • Result is successful EDI but not easily adaptable to others
What Did it Look Like? • It wasn’t pretty
What We Did About It:2000-2001 • Private effort to Redo Language • RRD, Quad, Meredith, Queb, others • Methods and Goals • Rewrite in XML • Test across variety of titles • Release to IdeAlliance for potential adoption
...What We Did About It:2002 • Presented to IdeAlliance Members • Review, suggestions, changes • Modified, Improved based on suggestions • February 2003 Rollout • New format appears stable and powerful
What it Looks Like Now • Lipstick on a pig? Or a silk purse...
Testing • Created live, complex magazine files • File integrity is built in to XML • (if it’s legible, it’s structured) • Included postal data, edition data, paper, weight, etc. • Thumbs up, ready to roll
Transition: Historical Ability • Converter written and tested • Converts XML to PROSE 1.2 • Compatible with Prograph Toolbox
Benefits: Publishers • Error reduction • No re-keyboarding at plant • Later closing • Closed-loop production data • No more bushel-basket instructions • Coordination among vendors
Risks: Publishers • Publishers often rely on vendors to fix messes • Data must be complete • Errors might obviously be your own fault
Benefits: Printers • Reallocate time spent re-keying data • Fewer mistakes, opportunities for make-goods • Integrated, digital workflow • Uniformity among customers
Risks: Printers • Very few risks • Printers are accustomed to digital workflows
The Big Picture: PROSE XML Interface to... • CDS, EDS, TCS, etc. • USPS • Wholesalers • Image Management • Ad Sales Database • Printer’s job control system
What to Do Next • Prepare to Digitize Production • Get rid of the pencils • Cross-Departmental Involvement • Electronic production data involves all departments • Eat Change for Breakfast • Automation of this magnitude will change your entire operation
Who’s Going First? Pubs... • Meredith • Participated in PROSE development since 1989 and isn’t giving up now • Gruner + Jahr • Coordinating and automating all production data • First postal-certified staff members for PAGE integration
Who’s Going First? Printers... • RRD building DIMs system around XML including PROSE • Quad plans to request PROSE from customers to feed job control • Brown, Perry/Judds, Quebecor all moving toward XML
R.O.I.? • Standards create R.O.I. • Cycle time reduction • More Productivity (use your imagination) • Closed-loop production data for all parties
PROSE XML It’s ready. Let’s rock.