1 / 15

Evaluating and Scoring Scientific Papers in Bibliographies and its Connection to SICRIS and COBISS Systems

Learn about the introduction of COBISS as an evaluation tool in scientific paper scoring, the shift towards publishing in reputable international journals, and the use of quantitative data in evaluating publications.

tshockley
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating and Scoring Scientific Papers in Bibliographies and its Connection to SICRIS and COBISS Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluating and scoring scientific papers in bibliographies and the connection to SICRIS and COBISS systems Ljubljana, 8th October 2013 Dr. Stojan Pečlin

  2. Sources of Quantitative Data - COBISS

  3. COBISS • The introduction of COBISS as an evaluation tool increased the objectivity of the evaluation process, • Introduction of the COBISS database as the official database for publications used in the evaluation procedures in 1997 gave a significant momentum to the change of habits in publication, • It caused a shift toward publishing in international journals with high reputation, • The reputation of researchers is no longer based on abstract criteria but is grounded on solid quantitative data, • The criteria for evaluating publications are available and anyone is easily able to determine the significance of publications according to pre-set criteria.

  4. On-line bibliographic data: COBISS

  5. Typology of documents for bibliography management in COBISS – selected documents 1.01 Original scientific article (from 40 to 300 points), 1.02 Review article, 1.16 Chapter in a monograph published by an international science publishing house – 60 points, 2.01 Monograph published by an international science publishing house - 160 points, 2.24 Patent awarded at the European Patent Office, U.S. Patent Office – 200 points, 2.20 Data publication (Zaključena znanstvena zbirka podatkov) – 30 points

  6. Sources of Quantitative Data - SICRIS

  7. SICRIS • incorporates substantial information on research and research results, • provides information on all projects funded by public funds, • an integral system which supplements COBISS with more substantial information.

  8. Score for a quantitative assessment

  9. PETER DOVČ [05098] Criteria for determining eligibility for a principal investigator of research project Note: 2,45 Doseženo število točk:735 A1 (0-5) maximum value 1500 points Doseženo število citatov: 1061 Note:10 A2 (0-10) maximum value 600 points Shows a minimum total score of scientific publications in the last five years, as cited in the last ten years and documented collaboration with other funders in the last five years and the outstanding achievements. Note (A1+A2+A3+A4): 15,47

  10. Eligibility criteria –entry conditions The limit value of the sum A1+A2+A3+A4 which the project leaders must have in the application for each field separately – the values for 2013 are: Basic project: A1+A2+A3+A4=5.5 natural sciences A1+A2+A3+A4=5.0 technical sciences A1+A2+A3+A4=2.5 medical sciences, pharmaceutical sciences and geology A1+A2+A3+A4=3,5 biotechnology and biology A1+A2+A3+A4=2.0 social sciences and clinical medicine A1+A2+A3+A4=2.5 humanities

  11. Use of quantitative indicators • Pre-filtering focused on scientific and broader criteria is for potential applicants already done in a stage of eligibility screening. • Determination of researchers who can automatically enter the second round of assessment on the basis of the sum of indicators (A1+A2+A3+A4). • An important reason for introducing this was to decrease the burden of administration, at least for the majority of researchers who already have a rich bibliographic record to prove their excellence.

  12. Thank you for your attention! stojan.peclin@arrs.si

More Related