Transforming Education with Technology Trends
130 likes | 163 Vues
Explore how Wolcott High School uses technology for data-driven learning and how scanning scenarios open up unimaginable possibilities in education. Discover the benefits and challenges of learning analytics, economic factors, and demographic trends affecting modern education.
Transforming Education with Technology Trends
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Vision for Education – 2017 Sarah Stabile Post University – EDU505 Jennifer Wojcik
Wolcott High School • Public high school founded in 1958 • Mission: “Wolcott High School provides a positive learning environment to engage students in meaningful learning for success in the 21st century.” • 2012 Wolcott implemented the New Common Core State Standards • Increased rigor • Capstone project with career developed pathways • 2012 Wolcott implemented a modified-block schedule • In-depth student collaboration projects • Effective technology used • Discovery-based learning
Technology Used In (and For) the Classroom • Analytic Learning • Data teams organized by subject • Compare data to improve student learning • Mimio Software and Clickers • Tablets • Individualized learning experience • Apps • Cost effective • Immediate resources
Scenarios and Scanning Scenarios Benefits Opens up the mind to unimaginable possibilities and challenge long-held internal beliefs of an organization; …compelling its managers to rethink radically” (Mietzner & Reger, 2005, p. 235). Newly adapted ideas instead of pre-existing ones; corporations are no longer focusing on "black and white scenarios or the most-likely scenario” (Mietzner & Reger, 2005, p.236). Consequences A surprise event can collapse society’s productivity (Clardy, 2011, p.43). Data and other sources have to be collected and interpreted making scenario building time-consuming (Mietzner & Reger, 2005, p. 236). Scanning Benefits Supports from concrete evidence of how these trends have succeeded or failed previously, which allows people to slightly modify these trends for a better tomorrow Learning analytics personalizes education for each student to achieve a measure of success. Challenges Economics and financial distress Some of the modern technology does not have many trends to base a premise off of to predict future behaviors
Technological Trends Web 2.0 Technologies Mobile, Ubiquitous and Contextual Computing Both • Allows people to communicate with others and share ideas, videos, opinions, and more online • “Enhances and increased the quality of student work” (Pritchett, Wohleb, & Pritchett, 2013, p. 2) • Leads to individualized learning experiences • Collect Data to better understand areas of weakness • Analytic learning • Shows “increased motivation and self-directedness, accessibility and portability as a personal learning tool” (Klopfer, Yoon, & Perry, 2005, p. 2). • Instant access to information which leads to “just-in-time” learning
Budgeting Trends • Hiring freezes or restrictions, laying off of [full-time and] part-time faculty members, and reducing academic programs (Betts, Hartman, and Oxholm, 2009) • Learning journeys provide futuristic ways of learning that can be cost effective; yet, provide an eclectic collection of resources. • OER (open educational resources), are free for students to use • “help[s] learners connect with people, resources, and activities that can propel them along their chosen learning pathways” (Zimmerman, 2011, p. 1) • Allow students to engage in meaningful learning by making learning connections in and out of the classroom, in the community or online (Zimmerman, 2011)
Demographic Trends • Immigration students • Legalization may help close the achievement gap • Higher rate of success because of a sense of community (Hao & Woo, 2012) • Networking and collaboration skills • Tablets may improve learning with one-to-one assistance • STEM-related jobs • More males than females • More STEM than non-STEM jobs (Milgrim, 2011) • Females involved with technology at a young age may develop an interest to pursue career at an older age • Females provide a different perspective
5 Ways to Prepare • Invest in classroom sets of tablets • Further research online educational apps, softwares, and other programs • Participate in professional development to learn how to appropriately assist students in content specific areas of virtual learning • Budget for new technologies • Provide more STEM-based elective classes for students to develop a further interest in these areas
Call to Action • Purchase a set of tablets for students to easily connect to the world around them and have access to several educational online resources. • Budget for the purchase of these tablets and apps • Participate in content specific professional development on how to properly use the technologies that are going to be implemented within a classroom (Davis & Rose, 2007). • Several apps should be researched • Collaborate online in a discussion forum concerning the pros and cons of each app or software. • Collect data from the use of these programs on each tablet. • Collaborate with their content specific colleagues to discuss teaching methods • Administration should designate common preps to teachers
References • Betts, K., Hartman, K., & Oxholm III, C. (2009, December). Re-examining and re-positioning higher education: Twenty economic and demographic factors driving online and blended program enrollments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(4), 3-23. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v13n4/re-examining-amp-repositioning-highereducation-20-economic-and-demographic-factors-drivi • Clardy, A. (2011) Six Worlds of Tomorrow: Representing the Future to Popular Culture. [Article] World Future Review, 3(2), p.37-48 • Davis, N. & Rose, R. (2007, November). Research committee issues brief: Professional development for virtual schooling and online learning. North American Council for Online Learning. Retrieved from http://www.inacol.org/resources/publications/inacol-reports/2/ • Groff, L. & Smoker, P. (1996). Global Options: Introduction to Future Studies Topics. Retrieved from http://www.csudh.edu/global_options/IntroFSTopics.HTML#FSMethodols • Hao, L. & Woo, H. (2012). Distinct trajectories in the transition to adulthood: Are children of immigrants advantaged?. Child Development, 83(5), 1623. DOI: 10.1111/j.146786 24.20 12.01798.x
References cont. • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & • Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education • Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. • Klopfer, E., Yoon, S., & Perry, J. (2005, September). Using palm technology in • participatory simulations of complex systems. Journal of Science Education & • Technology, 14(3), 285-297. doi: 10.1007/s10956-005-7194-0 • Mietzner, D., & Reger, G. (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of scenario • approaches for strategic foresight. International Journal of Technology • Intelligence and Planning, 1(2), 220-239.Retrieved from • http://www.lampsacus.com/documents/stragegicforesight.pdf • Milgram, D. (2011, November). How to recruit women and girls to the science, • technology, engineering, and math (STEM) classroom. Technology & • Engineering Teacher, 71(3), 4-11. Retrieved from • http://ehis.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=a2947163-d415-40e2 ae193da80b1e0cd5%40sessionmgr14&vid=5&hid=8&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=a9h&AN=67074361
References cont. • Pritchett, C., Wohleb, E., & Pritchett, C. (2013, February). Educator’s • perceived importance of Web 2.0 technology applications, Tech Trends, 57(2), • 33-38. doi: 10.1007/s11528-013-0643-3 • Zimmerman, G. (2011). Learning journey mentor. KnowledgeWorks. • Retrieved from http://www.knowledgeworks.org/learning-in-2025