1 / 18

EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the

5/30/11. EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the Exchange Network National Meeting Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Outline. E-Reporting is Here Opportunity Savings and Benefits Agency Electronic Reporting Plans

tuari
Télécharger la présentation

EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 5/30/11 EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the Exchange Network National MeetingPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania

  2. Outline • E-Reporting is Here • Opportunity • Savings and Benefits • Agency Electronic Reporting Plans • Challenges

  3. E-Reporting Has Arrived • E-Reporting is here, for example: • Taxes • Stocks, bond and mutual funds • Mortgage/loan applications • Medical • Job applications • Retail purchases • Staying in the paper world not an option.

  4. Environmental Opportunity • Advances in emissions/pollutant monitoring and information technology are likely to vastly change environmental protection. • This will give industry, government and public new and better information on pollution sources and environmental conditions. • This will create new incentives to reduce and prevent pollution. • Electronic reporting is critical component in making this happen.

  5. What is electronic reporting for environmental regulations? • E-reporting is not just emailing a file to the government. • E-reporting is a system: • Web tool or smart form, (e.g. , TRI-ME), which: • Prevents errors, reuses data, performs calculations. • Provides compliance assistance. • Provides quick confirmation of submission and acceptance. • National data standards, including electronic signature identity validation for CROMERR • System to accept, integrate and analyze the data.

  6. Cost Savings • Electronic reporting reduces costs associated with all steps in paper reporting: • Creation of paper report • Mailing • Receipt by government • Manual data entry into system • Subsequent error correction from: • Submitted paper form • Created by government from manual key punching. • This is a major annoyance to regulated entities.

  7. Program Benefits should reduce pollution • With more complete, higher quality, and timely data, government can more effectively prioritize regulation development, permitting, monitoring and enforcement. • Public transparency enhanced. • Transparency tools may be non-government as well, apps. • Regulated entities will know their data is immediately accessible and this will increase incentive for them to comply.

  8. Examples of E-Reporting in Environmental Protection • NPDES E-Reporting: • Improves quality and utility of NPDES program data by ensuring that the information submitted to EPA and the states is timely, accurate, complete, and nationally consistent. • Automatically identify some violations and assess their severity • TRI-ME: • e-reporting promotes more accurate reporting with fewer facility errors and can allow regulators to more efficiently evaluate compliance • Acid Rain program: • Standardized e-reporting helped contribute to the Program’s “largest quantified human health benefits of any federal regulatory program implemented in the last 10 years.

  9. Background on Agency E-Reporting Activities • EPA’s Final Plan for Periodic Retrospective Reviews of Existing Regulations, August 2011, made public commitment to advance electronic reporting. • Agency created an Electronic Reporting Task Force in December 2011 to implement. • Co-chaired by Deputy Assistant Administrators for Enforcement (OECA), Environmental Information (OEI), andRegion 1 Deputy Regional Administrator. Members include managers from the 4 media program offices, Region 5, Office of General Counsel and Office of Policy. 9

  10. Task Force Key Responsibilities • Establish Agency policy for electronic reporting as “default” in new regulations. • Identify Agency priority for converting important existing paper reports to electronic, and opportunities for consolidation/deletion of existing paper, and comprehensive plan to do this. • Do this in a “OneEPA” approach.

  11. E-Reporting Agency Policy • Develop policy and implementing procedures/tools to establish electronic reporting as the “default” assumption in new regulations. This will address: • The types of data and format. • When new rules would allow or require paper reporting. • Standard exemptions from mandatory electronic reporting; • The efficient use of agency exchange services (e.g., registration, CROMERR, security, CDX) and data standards; • How to leverage agency resources for reuse and expansion of IT tools, interfaces, and services.

  12. Converting Important Existing Paper Reporting to Electronic • The Task Force requested Programs and regions to identify their most important paper reports for electronic conversion, and proposals for reducing or streamlining existing paper reporting. • The Task Force will review submissions and recommend a priority Agency list • Recommendations may include how to streamline regulation changes, including use of omnibus rules.

  13. Opportunity to be bold as we convert from paper to electronic: One idea - • Consolidate and convert to electronic the existing paper Financial Assurance reporting regulations under TSCA, RCRA-Corrective Action, RCRA-core, CERCLA and SDWA-UIC. • Perhaps standardize these programs and help ensure financial assurance funds will be available to perform cleanups. • Perhaps create one electronic reporting tool/portal and backend database to support FA reporting. • Perhaps modify all of these regulations via omnibus rule.

  14. Key ChallengesResources • Electronic Reporting has great benefits: • more complete, timely and quality data improve government and industry performance and expand transparency • Long-term costs savings over paper processes. • But electronic reporting requires investment and operation and maintenance costs. • The cost savings are spread across regions, states and regulated entities, but the system development and operation costs are often centralized in EPA headquarters or in a state.

  15. Key ChallengesResources: Third Party Vendor Software Tools • Vendors could build electronic reporting software for environmental programs. • Similar to IRS model (e.g., Turbo Tax, HR Block at Home) • Private vendors might build better front-end tools than states and EPA • EPA did proof of concept that validated this. • Need to develop systems and resources to do this.

  16. Key ChallengesCentralization at EPA • EPA (OEI) currently does provide some centralized services for supporting electronic reporting, but we still have multiple, separate program specific tools. • Would fewer tools be more efficient and still allow us to meet program specific needs? • Need to streamline regulation development to convert to electronic via omnibus rules and common economic analysis tools.

  17. Key ChallengesAddressing State Concerns • State readiness for electronic reporting varies considerably. • States generally support electronic reporting but concerned about investment costs. • Some states may use national EPA systems and tools to support electronic reporting. For example: • EPA front-end reporting tools (e.g., NetDMR, TRI-ME), or CROMERR service for identify proofing for electronic signature. • Back-end national data bases, such as ICIS-NPDES • States will need to extract data (outbound services)

  18. Key ChallengesOpportunity • State EPA Environmental Information Exchange Network and CDX give us good foundation. • We will reach out to states to understand their concerns and to address them. • The challenge is to move to electronic reporting efficiently, and leverage already built systems and tools. • Assume we do not want to build and support 50+ electronic reporting tools for each environmental program.

More Related