1 / 163

The Smoking Gun?

The Smoking Gun?. World Trade Center Building 7. Context for this presentation. How many of you have heard of World Trade Center Building 7 ? How many of you know it collapsed on 9/11 ? How many of you have seen a video of it coming down ?. 9/11: Caveat & Context.

tucker
Télécharger la présentation

The Smoking Gun?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Smoking Gun? World Trade Center Building 7

  2. Context for this presentation • How many of you have heard of World Trade Center Building 7? • How many of you know it collapsed on 9/11? • How many of you have seen a video of it coming down?

  3. 9/11: Caveat & Context • Many persuasive statements of position • Little light-shedding discussion • doubters (“9/11 Truth”) and debunkers • much suspicion and character assassination • separate sites/videos/books attack each other • hard to piece together logical back-and-forth • very few actual debates or discussions • fewer that are fair and logical • The neurological reaction (on all sides) • Instinctive rejection of counter thoughts/evidence • I’ve been there often!

  4. Presentation Outline • Introduction to WTC 7 • Significance I • The collapse • NIST investigation claims • Problems with NIST investigation • Alternative theory • Significance II • Conclusion

  5. Introduction toBuilding 7

  6. WTC Building 7 The Salomon Brothers Building

  7. The World Trade Center North: down and rightWTC7: lower right North Tower: 100yds south

  8. What/who was in it? • Mayor’s Emergency Operations Center(independent and secure air and water supplies, bullet and bomb resistant windows designed to withstand 200 MPH winds) -- moved out before 9AM on 9/11 • IRS Regional Council • Secret Service • Securities and Exchange Commission(including files on many high profile cases, the most notable perhaps being Enron -- reportedly the only copies of the files) • CIA • Many financial companies

  9. Building What? • Never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission report • Almost never mentioned in the press after 9/11 • Press consistently refuses to show video • Scarborough: low-quality, VP permission • Repeated requests by Dr. Steven Jones • New York judge: “Building what?”

  10. WTC7’s Significance: I

  11. The First-Glance Oddities • Came down on the same day as Twin Towers • Not struck by a plane, only fires • None of the other WTC buildings collapsed due to fire alone • No steel-frame high-rise has ever collapsed due to fire, before or since

  12. High-Rise Fires Windsor Tower, Madrid, 2/05, 32 floors, 24 hrs

  13. High-Rise Fires Park Central Tower, Caracas, 10/04, 20/50 floors, 17 hrs

  14. High-Rise Fires Mandarin Hotel, Beijing, 09/02, 44 floors, 5 hrs

  15. High-Rise Fires • Assertion: “But these (and other dramatic examples) were structurally different” • Definitely true, but... on 9/11 • nobody knew that, • WTC7 fires were relatively small, isolated,and mostly short-lived, • the common assumption was that the planes had caused the only two other examples of high-rise collapse,

  16. The Visible Collapse:Confusing? or Persuasive?

  17. The Collapse 5 different videos and famous Dan Rather comment

  18. The Collapse, view 1

  19. The Collapse, view 2

  20. The Collapse, view 3

  21. The Collapse, view 4

  22. The Collapse, view 5 (Rather)

  23. TheGovernmentInvestigations

  24. The Investigations:The Problem • Lack (immediate destruction) of evidence • Structural steel was all that was left • Removed under extreme security • Shipped overseas for melting down • Investigators had little or no access • Evidence-selection criteria questionable • Most important: no independence

  25. The Investigations • FEMA -- 2002 • 9/11 Commission -- 2004 • NIST National Institute of Science and Technology • Interim report -- 2004 • Preliminary report -- 2005 • (Forecasts: 2006, early 2007, July 2008) • Draft for public comment -- August, 2008 • Final report -- November, 2008

  26. FEMA Investigation Did not have the “authority to impound pieces of steel before they were recycled” • “The ‘official investigation’ blessed by FEMA ... is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure”-- Fire Engineering Magazine • Bush administration agency (Katrina)

  27. FEMA Conclusion "The specifics of the fires [started by generator diesel fuel?] in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time... the best hypothesis [fire resulting in complete collapse] has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue."

  28. 9/11 Commission • Mandate (by law): investigate “facts and circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.” • Mandate (by chairmen): to give the “fullest possible account of the events surrounding 9/11.” • WTC7?Completely ignored.

  29. TheNISTInvestigation

  30. NIST Claims:These factors were NOT involved • Diesel fuel (the main possible source of really hot fires) • The odd construction spanning a Con Ed power substation • Damage to WTC7’s south side from the North Tower’s destruction

  31. NIST: WTC7 damage Missing chunk? (controversial) NIST schematic: south face 1-19

  32. NIST: WTC7 damage Damage to south face, from west

  33. NIST Claims:So what DID cause collapse? • 7-hour raging firescausing • Thermal expansion • Heated floor beams, lengthening them, which • Pushed a girder they abutted off its footing, which • Robbed a single vertical column of its lateral support, which then collapsed, causing • Progressive global collapse • a brand new concept

  34. And now we pause,ladies and gentlemen,for a few minor details...

  35. Caution advised!The following information is so detailed it may lull you into thinking it makes sense.(It did to me, at first...)

  36. NIST: WTC7 Structure Columns and framing -- 24 core & 19 perimeter columns

  37. NIST: WTC7 Structure Floors 8-20, 24-45 -- note elevator positions relative to core

  38. NIST: WTC7 Structure Core columns, girders and beams

  39. NIST: Thermal Expansion Floor beams supposedly push against girder

  40. The infamous Column 79

  41. NIST: Collapse Mechanism Column 79 girder connection

  42. NIST: Collapse Mechanism Column 79

  43. NIST: Collapse Mechanism Columns 80 & 81

  44. NIST: Collapse Mechanism Unsupported east floors fall on Truss 2

  45. NIST: Collapse Mechanism Truss 2 fails

  46. NIST: Collapse Mechanism Columns 77-78-78A buckle

  47. NIST: Collapse Mechanism Core column collapse progression

  48. NIST: Collapse Global collapse: part 1

  49. NIST: Collapse Global collapse: part 2

  50. NIST: Collapse Global collapse: part 3

More Related