100 likes | 212 Vues
Session Three focuses on the integration of focus group techniques and survey assignments into formative research design. Participants will explore construct validity, ensuring that the measures used accurately capture the intended concepts. They will also delve into reliability of data, emphasizing consistency in measurement and coding. Through hands-on exercises, attendees will analyze data from a nonprofit's food pantry initiative, learning how to assess service delivery and implementation measures. The session includes strategies for improving validity and reliability in research.
E N D
Objectives of Session Three • Focus Group and Survey Assignment • Formative Design Proposal • Construct Validity • Reliability in Data • In-class Data Exercise
Focus Group/Survey Project • Select topic and moderator(s) • ½ hour – no penalty if you do not finish your guide • Short ice-breaker, background on topic, and questions • Be prepared with follow-up questions • Handout relating to survey design
Sources for Formative Design Proposal • Conduct an internet search using keywords for your program area of interest and evaluation terms • Points of Light Foundation -http://www.pointsoflight.org/ • United Way - http://national.unitedway.org/ • Electronic Policy Network -http://movingideas.org/ • Evaluation Center -http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/index.html • Michigan Non-profit link - http://comnet.org/index.html • Community Foundation of CNY - http://www.cnycf.org/nonprofit/grantees.cfm
Construct Validity • Does the measure capture the construct of interest? How well does the measure capture the process at hand? -Face validity -Content validity -Convergent v. Discriminant validity
Achieving Construct Validity • Propose different possibilities for valid measures or operationalizations of the following concepts: • Quality of an individual’s diet • Customer satisfaction with visit to the Dept. of Motor Vehicles • Racial or ethnic identity • Physical limitations
Reliability • Free of error • Consistency in measurement and in coding • Data cannot be valid unless it is reliable, but reliable data can be invalid.
Internal and External Validity • Internal Validity:Does the design allow us to reach causal conclusions? • External Validity: Are your findings generalizable?
Improving Validity and Reliability of Data • Pretest your questions or data collection techniques • Use widely trusted measures • Correlations between coders/respondents • Develop multiple measures • Use qualitative findings to check quantitative findings and vice versa
In-Class Data Exercise • Data collected from Open Cupboard, nonprofit that opened 10 food pantries 6 months ago • What can the data tell us about service delivery? • Different measures of initial implementation and service delivery -- no impact or outcomes • Frequencies • Means and variance • Correlation • Which measures are most valid? Most reliable?