DNP 810 WEEK 8 CASE REPORT CUMULATIVE GCU

1. DNP 810 WEEK 8 CASE REPORT CUMULATIVE GCU Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course: https://www.tutorialsexperts.com/product/dnp-810-week-8-case-report- cumulative-gcu/ Or Email us HELP@TUTORIALSEXPERTS.COM Details: You will be creating a case report in stages over four course topics. This assignment will add to your previous work in Topic 5. Use an example from your own personal practice, experience, or own personal/family; however, simulated cases are not acceptable for practice hours and therefore not acceptable for this assignment. Examples might include a patient with Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy. Huntington’s disease, Down’s syndrome, sickle cell anemia, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations, or other genetic disorder that you and/or the organization you practice in may specialize in treating. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Include the following: Guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy). The role that money and grants play in scientific advances/the economics of health care (capitalism). The role and involvement family plays into the health care decision.

2. Directions: For this assignment (Conclusion of the Case Report), include previous Parts 1, 2, and 3 of the Case Report in one document, combined with additional genetics information learned from the assigned readings from all course topics. This final Case Report document should include the following: 1. Describe the disease, its prevalence, its incidence and general knowledge of the disease. 2. Discuss the laboratory testing that can be done. 3. Describe if chromosomal analysis is/was indicated, and detail the chromosomal change that caused the disease if it is a chromosomal disorder. 4. Describe the disorder in terms of its origin as either a single gene inheritance, or as a complex inheritance and considerations for practice and patient education. 5. Describe the gene mutation of the disease, as well as whether it is acquired or inherited, and how the mutation occurs. 6. Examine how genetics can influence policy issues. 7. Discuss any nutritional influences for this disease. 8. Process of nutritional assessment and counseling as it relates to health, prevention, screening, diagnostics, prognostics, selection of treatment, and monitoring of treatment effectiveness. Continue your paper with 1,000-1,250 words which include the following: 1. Discuss any ethical considerations for this disease. 2. Compare how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices. 3. Discuss the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events. 4. Create a plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder. Portfolio Practice Hours: Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement which reminds you, the student, to enter in a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10. You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course.

3. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network. To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper: Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-810 I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor. Case Report: Cumulative 2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content Discussion of ethical considerations for this disease is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Comparison of how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices is clearly present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Discussion of ethical considerations for this disease is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Discussion of ethical considerations for this disease is present but done at a perfunctory level. 20.0 %Discussion of Ethical Considerations for This Disease Discussion of ethical considerations for this disease is not present. Discussion of ethical considerations for this disease is present but incomplete. Comparison of how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Discussion of the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events is clearly presented. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Comparison of how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices is present but done at a perfunctory level. Comparison of how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices is not present. Comparison of how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices is present but incomplete. 20.0 %Comparison of How Genetics Can Improve Care and Health Outcomes While Reducing Cost to Usual Practices Discussion of the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but Discussion of the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events is presented but incomplete. Discussion of the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events is not presented. Discussion of the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events is presented but done at a perfunctory level. 15.0 %Discussion of the Changes in Approaches to Care When New Evidence Warrants Evaluation of Other Options for Improving Outcomes or Decreasing Adverse Events

4. some outdated sources are used. A plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder is presented but incomplete. A plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder is presented but done at a perfunctory level. A plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder is not presented. A plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. A plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder is clearly presented. Discussion is insightful and detailed. 10.0 %Plan for How You Might Educate Colleagues and/or Patients on This Genetic Disorder Previous case reports are included as the beginning of this paper is not present. 5.0 %Previous Case Reports are Included as the Beginning of this Paper Previous case reports are included as the beginning of this paper but missing two areas. Previous case reports are included as the beginning of this paper but missing one area. Previous case reports are included as the beginning of this Paper is completely present. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 10.0 %Format Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. 5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

5. 5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 100 %Total Weightage Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Download File