1 / 71

Antibacterial susceptibility testing

Antibacterial susceptibility testing. Drug classes Methods for testing Laboratory strategies. Basic principles of antimicrobial action. 1. Agent is in active form - pharmacodynamics: structure & route 2. Achieve sufficient levels at site of infection - pharmacokinetics.

twila
Télécharger la présentation

Antibacterial susceptibility testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Antibacterial susceptibility testing

  2. Drug classes Methods for testing Laboratory strategies

  3. Basic principles of antimicrobial action 1. Agent is in active form - pharmacodynamics: structure & route 2. Achieve sufficient levels at site of infection - pharmacokinetics

  4. Anatomic distribution Serum CSF Urine Ampicillin + + + Ceftriaxone + + + Vancomycin + ± + Ciprofloxacin + ± + Gentamicin + - + Clindamycin + - - Norfloxacin - - + Nitrofurantoin - - +

  5. Basic principles of antimicrobial action • 3. Adsorption of drug by organism • 4. Intracellular uptake • 5. Target binding • Growth inhibition (bacteriostatic) • or death (bactericidal) • - Resistance can develop at any point

  6. Mechanisms of action Beta-lactams Penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems Inhibit cell wall synthesis by binding PBPs Active against many Gram + and Gram – (varies) Aminoglycosides Gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, streptomycin Inhibit protein synthesis (30S ribosomal subunit) Gram + and Gram – but not anaerobes

  7. Beta-lactams http://www.life.umd.edu/classroom/bsci424/Definitions.htm

  8. Aminoglycosides http://gsbs.utmb.edu/microbook/ch011.htm

  9. Mechanisms of action Fluoroquinolones Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin Inhibit DNA synthesis by binding to gyrases Active against many Gram + and Gram – (varies) Glycopeptides Vancomycin Inhibit cell wall synthesis by binding precursors Gram + only

  10. Quinolones Glycopeptide http://gsbs.utmb.edu/microbook/ch011.htm

  11. Mechanisms of action Macrolides-lincosamides Erythromycin, azithromycin, clindamycin Inhibit protein synthesis (50S ribosomal subunit) Most Gram + and some Gram – Tetracyclines Tetracycline, doxycycline Inhibit protein synthesis (30S ribosomal subunit) Gram + and Gram – and intracellular orgs.

  12. Macrolides Tetracycline http://gsbs.utmb.edu/microbook/ch011.htm

  13. Mechanisms of action Oxazolidinones Linezolid Inhibit protein synthesis (50S ribosomal subunit) Gram + and Gram – including multi-resistant Streptogramins Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid) Inhibit protein sythesis (50S ribosomal subunit) Primarily Gram + organisms

  14. Linezolid Streptogramins http://www.kcom.edu/faculty/chamberlain/Website/Lects/Metabo.htm

  15. Mechanisms of action Trimethoprim Sulfonamides Usually combined (Trimeth/sulfa) Inhibit different parts of folic acid pathway affects DNA synthesis Gram + and many Gram –

  16. http://gsbs.utmb.edu/microbook/ch011.htm

  17. Mechanisms of resistance Biologic - physiologic changes resulting in a decrease in susceptibility Clinical - physiologic changes have progressed to a point where drug is no longer clinically useful

  18. Mechanisms of resistance Environmentally-mediated Physical or chemical characteristics that alter the agent or the organism’s physiologic response to the drug pH anaerobiasis cations metabolites

  19. Mechanisms of resistance Microorganism-mediated Intrinsic  predictable Gram neg vs. vancomycin (uptake) Klebsiella vs. ampicillin (AmpC) Aerobes vs. metronidazole (anaerobic activation)

  20. Mechanisms of resistance Microorganism-mediated Acquired  unpredictable - this is why we test - mutations, gene transfer, or combination

  21. Mechanisms of resistance These factors are taken into account to attempt to standardize in vitro testing methods. In vitro methods are not designed to recreate in vivo physiology. In vivo physiology affects clinical response such that in vitro testing cannot be used to predict clinical outcome.

  22. Mechanisms of resistance • Common pathways • Enzymatic degradation or modification of agent • Decreased uptake or accumulation of agent • Altered target • Circumvention of consequences of agent • Uncoupling of agent-target interactions • Any combination of above

  23. Selective pressure from excessive antimicrobial use and abuse Mixing of bacterial gene pool Emergence of resistance Survival of the fittest

  24. Emergence of resistance • 1. Emergence of new genes • - MRSA, VRE, GISA • 2. Spread of old genes to new hosts • - Pen resistant GC , GRSA • 3. Mutations of old genes resulting in more potent resistance • - ESBLs • 4. Emergence of intrinsically resistant opportunistic bacteria • - Stenatrophomonas

  25. Methods for detecting resistance Goal: To determine whether organism expresses resistances to agents potentially used for therapy Designed to determine extent of acquired resistance

  26. Methods for detecting resistance • Goals of standardization • Optimize growth conditions • Maintain integrity of antimicrobial agent • Maintain reproducibility and consistency

  27. Methods for detecting resistance National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) Name changed to: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)

  28. Methods for detecting resistance Standardization Limits: In no way mimic in vivo environment Results cannot predict outcome because of: - diffusion in tissue and host cells - serum protein binding - drug interactions - host immune status and underlying illness - virulence of organism - site and severity of infection

  29. Methods for detecting resistance Standardization Inoculum size Growth medium Incubation atmosphere, temperature, duration Antimicrobial concentrations used

  30. Methods for detecting resistance Inoculum preparation Standardized inoculum size using turbidity standard McFarland standard: mixing various volumes of 1% sulfuric acid and 1.175% barium chloride 0.5 McFarland = 1.5 x 108 CFU/mL Adjust by eye or using instrument

  31. Methods for detecting resistance Growth media Mueller-Hinton pH Cation conc. Blood and serum suppl. Thymidine content Thickness

  32. Methods for detecting resistance Incubation conditions Temperature: 35°C Atmosphere: room air (most) 5 – 10% CO2 (fastidious)

  33. Methods for detecting resistance Incubation time GNR: 16 – 18 hrs. GPC: 24 hrs.

  34. Methods for detecting resistance Selection of antimicrobial agents Organism identification or group Acquired resistance patterns of local flora Testing method used Site of infection Formulary

  35. Methods for detecting resistance Directly measure the activity of one or more antimicrobial agents against an isolate Directly measure the presence of a specific resistance mechanism in an isolate Measure complex interactions between agent and organism Detect specific genes which confer resistance

  36. Methods for detecting resistance Directly measure antimicrobial activity Conventional methods Broth dilution Agar dilution Disk diffusion Commercial systems Special screens and indicator tests

  37. Conventional methods Inoculum preparation for manual methods Pure culture, 4 – 5 isolated colonies, 16 – 24 hrs old GNR: inoculated into broth and incubated until reaching log phase GPC: suspended in broth or saline and tested directly

  38. Conventional methods Broth dilution Various concentrations of agent in broth Range varies for each drug Typically tested at doubling dilutions Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC): lowest concentration required to visibly inhibit growth

  39. Conventional methods Broth dilution Microdilution: testing volume 0.05 – 0.1 mL Macrodilution: testing volume >1.0 mL Final concentration of organism: 5 x 105 CFU/mL

  40. Conventional methods Agar dilution Doubling dilution is incorporated into agar Multiple isolates tested on each plate Final amount of organism spotted: 1 x 104 CFU Visually examine for growth, determine MIC

  41. Conventional methods Disk diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) Surface of agar plate seeded with lawn of test organism Inoculum: swab from 0.5 McFarland Disks containing known conc. of agent placed on surface of plate Measure diameter of zone of inhibition

  42. Conventional methods Disk diffusion Zone sizes have been correlated with MICs to establish interpretive criteria Typically, 12 – 13 disks can be placed on each plate

  43. Conventional methods Antibiotic gradient diffusion Agent is applied in gradient to a test strip Plate is seeded with organism as in KB Agent diffuses away from strip to inhibit growth Etest (AB BIODISK, Sweden)

  44. Interpretive categories Susceptible: agent may be appropriate for therapy; resistance is absent or clinically insignificant Intermediate: agent may be useful if conc. at site of infection; may not be as useful as susceptible agent; serves as safety margin for variability in testing Resistant: agent may not be appropriate for therapy; inhibitable dose not acheivable or organism possesses resistance mechanism

  45. Automated systems Manual preparation of isolate suspension Manual – completely automated inoculation Automated incubation, reading of results Automated interpretation and data management

  46. MicroScan WalkAway Dade-Behring

More Related