html5-img
1 / 107

Recurrent abdominal pain of childhood: new insights

Recurrent abdominal pain of childhood: new insights. Professor Mike Thomson Centre for Paediatric Gastroenterology Sheffield Children’s Hospital and Portland Hospital, London www.paediatricgastroenterologist.com. Chronic abdominal pain of childhood. ‘The Received Wisdom’

twyla
Télécharger la présentation

Recurrent abdominal pain of childhood: new insights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recurrent abdominal pain of childhood: new insights Professor Mike Thomson Centre for Paediatric Gastroenterology Sheffield Children’s Hospital and Portland Hospital, London www.paediatricgastroenterologist.com

  2. Chronic abdominal pain of childhood • ‘The Received Wisdom’ • ‘The New Vantage Point’ • A practical diagnostic/therapeutic approach

  3. Chronic abdominal pain of childhood • ‘The Received Wisdom’ • ‘The New Vantage Point’ • A practical diagnostic/therapeutic approach

  4. Chronic abdominal pain: ‘The Received Wisdom’ • Apley and Naish 1958 • “Chronic intermittent abdominal pain between the ages of 4 and 16 years lasting for more than 3 months and interfering with normal daily activity” • Apley J, Naish N. Arch Dis Child. 1958;50:429-36.

  5. Chronic abdominal pain • 10-15% all <16 years fulfil this definition • Further 10-15% experience pain but does not interfere with normal daily activities • ‘Recurrent abdominal pain’ (RAP) • ‘Functional’

  6. y

  7. No warning signs

  8. Warning signs

  9. STRESS Substance P Impaired Intestinal Barrier Function Mast cells Macromolecular Ag absorption CRH Eosinophil NK1 and NK2 PAIN Induction of inappropriate inflammaiton

  10. ‘Functional’ RAP • ‘Nearer the umbilicus’ rule • GENUINE pain • Altered GI motility and visceral hypersensitivity • Not necessarily a diagnosis of exclusion • NOT if < 4 years, and less common if >14 years

  11. ‘Functional’ RAP : THE FALLACY! • ‘the high achieving perfectionist constantly worrying daughter of a demanding father in a highly stressful school environment’ • Nevertheless…..

  12. ‘Functional’ RAP: characteristics • Evidence of physical or psychological stressful stimuli • Environmental reinforcement of pain behaviour • Normal physical examination • Normal first line lab evaluation (FBC, ESR, CRP, urinalysis, urine culture, faecal MCS OCP)

  13. ‘Functional’ RAP: make a positive diagnosis • Paroxysmal (variable in severity) • Clustering of pain episodes (weeks-months) • Begins gradually • Peri-umbilical or mid-epigastric • Inability to describe nature of pain • No temporal association with meals, exercise, but often happens at same time of day • Interrupts normal activity

  14. Chronic abdominal pain of childhood • ‘The Received Wisdom’ • ‘The New Vantage Point’ • A practical diagnostic/therapeutic approach

  15. ‘The New Vantage Point’Apley’s “rules” can now be questioned • GI motility studies • Helicobacter pylori • GI food allergy • Brain-gut axis • Development of paediatric endoscopy and other investigations • Abdominal migraine • Disaccharidase deficiencies

  16. Apley’s “rules” now questioned • GI motility studies • Helicobacter pylori • GI food allergy • Brain-gut axis • Development of paediatric endoscopy and other investigations • Abdominal migraine • Disaccharidase deficiencies

  17. ? Organic basis for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood • “Abnormal gastroduodenal motility in children and adolescents with recurrent functional abdominal pain” Pineiro-Carrero et al. J Ped 1988 Abnormal patterns of motility: • ineffective propagation of luminal contents • segmental distension of small bowel • stimulation of proprioceptors in bowel wall

  18. ? Organic basis for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood • “Abnormalities of Gastrointestinal Motility in Children with Non-ulcer dyspepsia” • Cucchiara et al. Dig Dis Sci 1991 Abscence of antral phase III • delayed gastric emptying Non-propagated uncoordinated s.i. motility • increased duodeno-gastric reflux

  19. Electrogastrography

  20. Apley’s “rules” now questioned • GI motility studies • Helicobacter pylori • GI food allergy • Brain-gut axis • Development of paediatric endoscopy and other investigations • Abdominal migraine • Disaccharidase deficiencies

  21. Lymphonodular hyperplasia

  22. H pylori gastric ulcer

  23. Urea breath test

  24. ? Helicobacter pylori and recurrent abdominal pain in childhood. FOR: 1. Raymond et al J Clin Microbiol Aug 1994 abdominal painFH of PU HP +ve n=77 63.3% ns14% ns HP -ve n=74 48.6% ns5% ns • 75% of HP +ve group WITH abdo pain had NORMAL gastric mucosa / no PU

  25. ? Helicobacter pylori and recurrent abdominal pain in childhood. FOR: 2. Chong et al Pediatrics Aug 1995 HP +vePU RAP n=218 17.4%4% (4/14 HP +ve) No RAP n=238 10.5%0% (p<0.05) (only 111/218 with RAP were endoscoped)

  26. ? Helicobacter pylori and recurrent abdominal pain in childhood. AGAINST: 1. van der Meer et al Eur J Ped Oct 1993 HP serology +ve RAP n=82 8.5% Control n=39 5.1% (ns)

  27. ? Helicobacter pylori and recurrent abdominal pain in childhood. AGAINST: 2. McCallion et al J Ped Surg Mar 1995 RAP HP +ve n=127 17.3% Fasting serum HP -ve n=312 16.3% gastrin measured

  28. ? Helicobacter pylori and recurrent abdominal pain in childhood. AGAINST: 3. Macarthur et al JAMA Mar 1995 meta-analysis of 45 studies H Pylori and: Antral gastritis / DU...strong association GU.............................weak association RAP...........................very weak / no association

  29. CLA resistance or prior CLA therapy? H. pylori algorithm Symptoms 1 EGD with biopsies (& culture *) No Yes 12 2 H. pylori with PUD and/or gastritis Treat without CLA: PPI AMO MET 2 wks or bismuth based tx. FISH for CLA on paraffin slides of first biopsies EGD with Culture and CLA-testing 14 3 CLA resistance?* 13 15 Yes 4 No Unknown Treat according to result of CLA testing PPI-AMO-MET# or PPI-AMO-CLA# or Bismuth-AMO-MET or Sequential therapy 6 16 PPI AMO CLA PPI AMO MET 6 7 5 Noninvasive test for eradication Noninvasive test for eradication 17 8 HP eradicated? HP eradicated? Assess + Encourage compliance No Yes 11 Yes No 9 18 Observe Consider: other antibiotic bismuth quadruple therapy higher dosage CLA resistance or prior CLA therapy? Observe 10 19 12 EGD= Esophagogastroduodenoscopy PUD = Peptic ulcer disease CLA= Clarithromycin • = area with >20% CLA resistance rate • # according to background of child 20

  30. Apley’s “rules” now questioned • GI motility studies • Helicobacter pylori • GI food allergy • Brain-gut axis • Development of paediatric endoscopy and other investigations • Abdominal migraine • Disaccharidase deficiencies

  31. RAP and food allergy • GOR and upper GI dysmotility • Intestinal hurry and enteropathy • Constipation • Strong personal/FH of atopy/autoimmunity

  32. RAP and food allergy • GOR and upper GI dysmotility • Intestinal hurry and enteropathy • Constipation • Strong personal/FH of atopy/autoimmunity

  33. Allergic oesophagitis

  34. RAP and food allergy • GOR and upper GI dysmotility • Intestinal hurry and enteropathy • Constipation • Strong personal/FH of atopy/autoimmunity

  35. RAP and food allergy • GOR and upper GI dysmotility • Intestinal hurry and enteropathy • Constipation • Strong personal/FH of atopy/autoimmunity

More Related