1 / 9

For Better or Worse? National Employment Policy Approaches and Women with Disabilities

For Better or Worse? National Employment Policy Approaches and Women with Disabilities. John Vellacott Educational Leadership and Policy University of British Columbia. Disclaimer.

tyanne
Télécharger la présentation

For Better or Worse? National Employment Policy Approaches and Women with Disabilities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. For Better or Worse?National Employment Policy Approaches and Women with Disabilities John Vellacott Educational Leadership and Policy University of British Columbia

  2. Disclaimer • The information and opinions provided in this presentation are solely those of the author in his capacity as a doctoral student within the Educational Leadership and Policy Studies program at the University of British Columbia.

  3. The Issue • People with disabilities are far more likely to face employment challenges than persons without disabilities • The employment situation for women with disabilities is worse than that of men with disabilities or men and women without disabilities • Women with disabilities who are of aboriginal origin, persons of colour, or recent immigrants have even poorer employment prospects

  4. Why It’s Important • People with disabilities, especially women, suffer from appallingly high rates of poverty, and paid work is frequently cited as a primary route out of poverty. (England, 2003) • Being employed is seen as vital in our society, not just in terms of financial security, but also for self-esteem, independence, social relationships, self-worth, and personal identity (Yasuda, Wehman, Targett, Cifu, & West (2002)

  5. The Past • Vocational Rehabilitation for Disabled Persons Act, 1961(revised 1985) • Obstacles, 1981 • Employment Equity Act, 1985 • A Consensus for Action, 1990 • In Unison, 1998 • Employability Assistance for People with Disabilities, 1998 • Enabling Income: CPP Disability Benefits and Women with Disabilities (1999) • Multilateral Frameworks for Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities (2004)

  6. Current Situation • No national consensus on policy approaches • No formal, national employment policy for persons with disabilities • Multiple but fragmented policy and programmatic responses (policy silos) • Lack of communication both within and between silos • Fiefdoms and turf wars • Limited attention to the supports needed by women with disabilities

  7. Challenges • Need for some form of national policy response has been recognized in Canada for over 50 years with limited action • Complex policy issues impacting mandates, jurisdictional responsibilities, fiscal policies, and relationships between stakeholders • Increasing emphasis within Canadian social and fiscal policy on maximizing individual self-sufficiency and minimizing the amount of support provided by the state

  8. Some Ideas • Federal reengagement in disability employment policy • Develop a national employment strategy for persons with disabilities • Break down the silos • All levels of government collaborate - forget the turf • Stakeholders have real input at the decision making level on policy

  9. Your Thoughts? • jvellaco@interchange.ubc.ca

More Related