1 / 11

The Culture of VET- Kerschensteiner as Brand and Myth

Explore the cultural aspects of vocational education and training (VET) by examining the brand and myth surrounding Kerschensteiner's work in school reform and social pedagogy.

tynes
Télécharger la présentation

The Culture of VET- Kerschensteiner as Brand and Myth

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Culture of VET- Kerschensteiner as Brand and Myth Prof. Dr. Philipp Gonon, University of Zurich 17th of June 2013 Tampere Seminar 10. 15 a.m

  2. Content of Kerschensteners’ Brand & Myth • Culture of VET – VET & Culture: German “Kulturpädagogik” • Kerschensteiner – Life and Work • Kerschensteiner-Brand: Work in School as Social Pedagogy (Pestalozzi & Natorp) • Inclusive social policy (Bismarck) • Arts & craft - ethics & aesthetics and a new society (Werkbund) • Parity of esteem of Vocational and General (Paulsen, Dewey) • Legitmisation of the Vocational School: rise of a new pedagogical sector (Spranger, Fischer, Litt et al.) • Conclusion: Myth of Kerschensteiner: innventor of dual system?

  3. Culture & VET – VET & Culture • Education as a means of strengthening Germany as a cultural space: reforming society (culture versus civilisation & commerce) • German Kulturpädagogik: Education rooted in the German classics • ‘Pragmatic’ approach of reforming schools and universities (industry, technics) • Involving the masses not only for primary education • Work in School and VET as a lever of reform • Paulsen, Dilthey, Spranger, Kerschensteiner, Neo-Kantians

  4. Kerschensteiner (1854-1932) – Life and Work • Well known in his times as school reformer • Bavarian Teacher, studied Mathematics & Physics • 1895-1914: Career as mighty educational policy maker • 1918-1933: Politician and Professor at the University in Munich • Works: Civic Education (1901), Activity School (1908 ff.), Theory of Bildung (1926), The soul of the Teacher (1922)

  5. Kerschensteiner- Brand: Work in School • 1880s: Movement for manual work in schools: Finland, Sweden, Denmark, France: to meet industrial needs • Tradition in Germany, Switzerland: Manual work for the orfans, poor & lower classes in order to get employable • Reform-movement: manual work as an important element of pedagogy and learning (Seidel, Haufe) • Natorp; Pestalozzi as hero of social pedagogy: a school suiting for working-class • Manual Work as element of getting closer to “life” • Suitable for working & middle classes

  6. Kerschensteiner- Brand: Inclusive Social Policy • The so called “Social Question” • Making schools more inclusive • Fear of political uprising of the working class (Bismarck as Hero) • Reform of schools against modern individualism • (Platonic) Ideal State by educating people to their rank & vocation • Elites have to be a role model, educating the masses and forget their elitist behaviour in order to spread aristocratic virtues • Harmonization of the society through working together in schools and (later) in society through ‘working communities’

  7. Kerschensteiner- Brand: Arts & Crafts • Manual Work as craftsmenship is the way to get Bildung • Against Humboldt, with Goethe & Carlyle as Heroes • Inspiration by the English Arts & Crafts Movement (Morris) • German Werkbund aims to reform industry but also society • Craftsmenship makes products more beautiful (chairs, tapisteries, watches, houses) • Manual work & activity as the way to get a character which enables you to be a valuable and honoured citizen • Craftsmenship as a lever against alienation in the workplace (industry)

  8. Kerschensteiner- Brand: Parity of Esteem • Bildung as result of a journey: from elementary education through vocationally oriented education to higher (work-based) education • Against differentiation between lower manual and work-based education and higher academic education • Work and Craftsmanship-based experience of values as the basis of culture and self-improvement • Beruf as the ground of Bildung • VET hast to include general education • General education hast to include vocationally oriented education • Similar to Deweys’ philosophical Pragmatism

  9. Kerschensteiner- Brand: Legitimisation of the Vocational School • In modern societies vocational education has to be supported by schools • Reform of the continuation school: originally a place to deepen the knowledge of primary education • Vocationalisation and enlargement of the “Fortbildungsschule” • New Curriculum of the continuation school: integrating specific knowledge for specific professions, general knowledge for all and civic education • Continuation schools get mandatory for all (but not high-scool students): making the schools inclusive for boys and girls • New brand in the 1920s: from the Continuation Schools to VET Schools (Spranger, Fischer, Litt et al)

  10. Kerschensteiner- Myth: Founder of the Dual System? Conclusion • Sine the 70s in Germany: nearly forgotten due to his political & philosophical background • Kerschensteiner known for reforms like the VET schools: often driven by fear and conservative motives • Cultural Pedagogy is assumed to be anti-empirical & speculative • Most things were thought before, or claimed by other pedagogues: (cf. controversies with Seidel, Gaudig, Fischer, Dewey, Rickert, Simmel) • International reputation today: higher due to the “success” of the dual system; ironically he had not a clear view on behalf of the dual system • Critical appraisal is needed and helpfull

  11. Thank you for your attention! gonon@ife.uzh.ch Refernces: Ph. Gonon (2009): The Quest for Modern Vocational Education: Kerschensteiner between Dewey, Weber and Simmel. Bern: Peter Lang. Ph. Gonon (2013): Von Kerschensteiners Berufspädagogik zum Europäischen Qualifikationsrahmen – ein Blick zurück und nach vorne. In: BWP 3, p.36-39

More Related