1 / 42

Busted by the State for Drinking Too Much: Enforcement of Emergency Conservation Regulations

This presentation discusses the enforcement of emergency conservation regulations in response to drought conditions. It covers the impact on customers, the rate structure, and the water shortage contingency plan. Additionally, it highlights the efforts of the Eastern Municipal Water District to educate and outreach to customers for water conservation.

tyr
Télécharger la présentation

Busted by the State for Drinking Too Much: Enforcement of Emergency Conservation Regulations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Busted by the State for Drinking Too Much:Enforcement of Emergency Conservation Regulations Urban Water Institute, Inc. 22nd Annual Water Conference August 28,2015

  2. Busted by the State for Drinking Too Much:Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager Eastern Municipal Water District

  3. Busted by the State for Drinking Too Much:Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Christian M. Carrigan Director, Office of EnforcementState Water Resources Control

  4. Busted by the State for Drinking Too Much:Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Gregory J. Newmark Principal, Meyers Nave Chair, Drought Response Team

  5. Water Conservation Tiers

  6. Busted by the State for drinking too much: Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation regulations Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager Eastern Municipal Water District August 28,2015

  7. Overview of EMWD • Established in 1950 • Five publicly-elected board members • One of 26 MWD member agencies • 555 square miles • Cities served: Moreno Valley, Perris, Menifee, Murrieta, Temecula, Hemet, San Jacinto • Population: 785,000 (34% of Riverside County) • Full service agency, serving: • Water / wastewater / recycled • Wholesale and retail • Water: 142,000 connections • Wastewater: 237,000 connections • High growth / very low precipitation area (~10 in/yr. avg.)

  8. EMWD Water Supply Portfolio Imported Water Supply from MWD: 76,897 AF 51% Local Supply Initiatives • 18 active wells (adjudicated and managed basin) and two potable water filtration plants • Production capacity: 34 million gallons per day (MGD) • Two brackish groundwater desalters that produce 8 MGD • Four regional reclamation facilities producing 45 MGD of recycled water In both FY 2014 and FY 2015, 100%of tertiary wastewater was recycled for beneficial reuse FY 2015 • State Water Project – 3% • Colorado River (untreated and treated)- 48% Local Water Supply: 74,884 AF 49% • Recycled Water • Groundwater Wells • Desalination

  9. EMWD Rate Structure Implemented in 2009 • Creates an “Allocation” or “Water Budget” for each customer account based upon reasonable indoor and outdoor needs and efficient use. • Uses Economic Incentives: Water is priced to customer lower for use within allocation – much higher for use over allocation. Price/CCF Indoor Usage Budget Persons x 60 GPD Tier 1: $1.793 ($779/AF) Within Allocation Outdoor Usage Budget Irrigated Area x ET Factor x Conservation Factor Tier 2: $3.280 ($1,428/AF) Excessive Use Up to 50% over budget Tier 3: $5.879($2,561/AF) Wasteful Use More than 50% over budget Tier 4: $10.755 ($4,682/AF) Over Allocation

  10. Water Shortage Contingency Plan EMWD Uses its Rate Structure to Progressively Move through its Water Shortage Contingency Plan: After implementation of Stage 3a and associated outreach, EMWD saw Tier 3 “excessive” and Tier 4 “wasteful” sales and number of customers in these tiers dramatically decline. For July 2015 billing, 7% of customers were in Tier 4 while 93% of customers stayed in budget.

  11. SWRCB Regulatory Framework • Local Water Agencies Commented on Deficiencies in the Regulatory Framework • No credit is provided to agencies who achieved conservation prior to 2013. • The GPCD data is not adjusted for climate or housing density. • The base year/months are arbitrary and penalize warmer inland areas. • No credit is provided for local drought-proof supplies including desalination and recycled water, or shifts off SWP. State Board did not adopt the water industry’s call for framework revisions Local agencies worked together to provide a more credible quantitative model that still achieves a 25% statewide savings. www.emwd.org 11

  12. Required Potable Water Use Reductions Riverside County Agencies www.emwd.org 12

  13. Local Impacts of SWRCB Regulation www.emwd.org 13

  14. EMWD Response to SWRCB Regulations EMWD is mandated to reduce water usage by 28 percent. In response EMWD moved to Stage 4 of its Water Shortage Contingency Plan. • Stage 4: Mandatory Outdoor Reduction • Enforcement through Tiered Rates • Tier 3 allocation is eliminated – Tier 4 rate for all over-allocation usage. • Tier 2 (outdoor) allocation reduced by 10 percent • Changes immediate, appeared on bills dated after July 1, 2015 • Customers within their reduced water budgets will see no financial impacts Simple Message to Our Customers: Reduce outdoor irrigation use by 50 percent www.emwd.org 14

  15. Example of Customer Impact www.emwd.org 15

  16. Conservation Outreach and Education Programs • Annual Budget: Over $3 million • Message pathways include: • Mailers, door hangers, phone calls, radio, television, newspaper, local program advertisements, community events, e-mail, website, programs in schools, business partnerships, billboards and community banners, bill messages, social media, water-wise landscape signage, fleet vehicle magnets and theater slides • Over 2,500 hours per month dedicated to Conservation Education and Outreach • 18 full-time staff members dedicated at least half-time: • In addition, for FY 2015-16, added 2 permanent full-time employees and 10 temporary full-time employees • Most materials available in Spanish; 15 customer service representatives and 4 conservation staff members speak Spanish

  17. Customer Outreach “Let’s Get Serious About the Drought” • Customer Resources and Outreach • Newsletters/factsheets/Cable TV slides/Telephone and lobby messaging • Letters to customers in current Tiers 4,3, and higher-use Tier 2 (11,800 recipients) • Bill estimators and bill messages • Social media / e-mail (eBlaststo 35,000 email subscribers) • June results letter to customers (138,000 recip.) • Community Events: • EMWD has presented at 58community events since April 1, to a combined audience of more than 4,800 people www.emwd.org 17

  18. Water Waste Enforcement Fining Structure: • One warning letter is issued • A second violation results in fines: • $50 for residential customers • $200 for commercial customers • EMWD staff must witness violation in order to issue a fine • Offering mandatory EMWD training classes in-lieu of paying fines: • “Traffic school” approach • Customers with financial hardship • Enforcement Staff: • 3 FTEs (120 hours/week) • Monthly Enforcement Budget: $55,000 • Reporting Mechanisms • Phone: Water Waste Hotline 951-928-3777 ext. 3306 • Email: conservation@emwd.org • Website: www.emwd.org/ • Mobile Application: EMWD Water Waste Reporter • Conservation parkway patrolling on highways – Cited 20 locations/services

  19. Progress Toward State Mandated Conservation Standards – Inland Empire Water Suppliers 1st Month of Reporting under new Conservation Standards: June 2015

  20. SWRCB Information Order • On July 29, EMWD was notified it “missed its target conservation requirement by a significant margin” and would be receiving a Notice of Violation under separate cover. • The State Board invited EMWD to meet to “provide compliance assistance and help the District avoid future enforcement actions”. • List of 16 questions was provided for EMWD to address. • Meeting occurred August 6, 2015. • Subsequent Conservation Order not issued based upon progress.

  21. EMWD Progress: May – July 2015 Record breaking temperatures - June 2015 was the hottest June on record

  22. Prior Conservation Not Considered When Establishing Restrictions

  23. Going Forward – Emergency Regulations What have we learned? • Agencies and areas in the State with minimum pre-2013 conservation initiatives perfromed incredibly well. • Initial Emergency Regulation framework concerns should be correlated with compliance metrics to determine adjustments. • Emergency regulations beyond February of 2015 should be more sophisticated and incorporate these verified adjustments: • Pre-2013 and 2013-2015 conservation results and demand hardening. • Past “drought proof” investments (recycling, desalination, etc.) and demand shifting. • Weather normalization (climate) and variations in land use density. • Enforcement should continue to be flexible and recognize “good faith” efforts and the limited complexity of the existing regulations.

  24. Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager (951) 928-6130 jonesp@emwd.org

  25. Busted by the State for Drinking Too Much:Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Christian M. Carrigan Director, Office of EnforcementState Water Resources Control

  26. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Water Supplier Conservation Compliance June 2015 16 70 Compliance Priority 266 53

  27. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Water Supplier Conservation Compliance July 2015 4 49 Compliance Priority 59 290

  28. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Water Supplier Conservation Compliance June-July 2015 290 266 70 59 53 49 16 4

  29. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations

  30. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Sample Information Orders • Describe any and all actions approved by your governing board since April 1, 2015, to increase conservation. • Does your agency have conservation programs that specifically target the following customer classes? (Residential – Single Family, Residential – Multi-Family, Commercial, Industrial, Institutional) • Does your agency have an active leak detection and repair program? • Does your agency run conservation outreach and education programs? • Does your agency run any conservation programs jointly with other entities?

  31. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Sample Information Orders • Does your agency run any appliance rebate programs? • Does your agency run any water efficient landscape programs? • Does your agency have personnel dedicated to water waste enforcement? • Which type of rate structure does your agency use for residential customers? • Has your agency instituted any type of drought rate or pricing since June 1, 2014?

  32. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Sample Information Orders • What rates and pricing mechanisms are used to incent conservation by non-residential customers? • When was the last time your agency modified its rate structure? • What is your agency’s billing frequency? • Provide a complete copy of your agency’s rate/tariff • Provide a complete copy of your agency’s conservation ordinance/rules • Are all your residents on water meters?

  33. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Sample Conservation Order Actions (tailored to local needs and conditions) (A) Limit outdoor irrigation to no more than two days per week, before [time] or after [time] for all customers; (B) Identify and contact the top 100 water users, by volume, regarding opportunities to reduce water use by [date]; (C) Conduct [x] audits of CII (commercial, industrial, institutional) customers per month for the next [x] months. CII audits must include recommendations for water conservation actions and provide a timeline for implementing audit recommendations;

  34. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Sample Conservation Order Actions (D) Increase education and outreach on [specific topic] including, but not limited to the following: i) Develop and send out a mailer on [specific topic] by [date]; ii) Make [x] phone calls per month for the next [x] months to educate customers on [specific topic]; and iii) Add [specific topic] information to [water supplier] website and bills by [date]. (E) Increase the number of dedicated conservation personnel hours by [x] hours per week; (F) Investigate potential partnership opportunities (rebates, low-flow fixtures, etc.) with [energy company(s)] by [date]; (G) Investigate the possibility of a drought surcharge by [date]

  35. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Christian M. Carrigan Director, Office of EnforcementState Water Resources Control (916) 342-5889 cris.carrigan@waterboards.ca.gov

  36. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations

  37. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations

  38. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations

  39. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations

  40. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Does close equal compliance?

  41. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Question?

  42. Enforcement of the Emergency Conservation Regulations Gregory J. Newmark Principal, Meyers Nave Chair, Drought Response Team 213.626.2906 gnewmark@meyersnave.com

More Related