1 / 25

HNDBM – 12. Organization Structure

HNDBM – 12. Organization Structure. Lim Sei Kee @ cK. Organization structure. How job tasks are formally divided, grouped and coordinated Six key elements to design organization structure. Key design questions and answers for designing the proper organizational structure.

tyra
Télécharger la présentation

HNDBM – 12. Organization Structure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HNDBM – 12. Organization Structure Lim SeiKee @ cK

  2. Organization structure • How job tasks are formally divided, grouped and coordinated • Six key elements to design organization structure

  3. Key design questions and answers for designing the proper organizational structure

  4. Work specialization • The degree to which activities in the organization are subdivided into separate jobs. • Efficient use of employees skills • Efficient use of organizational resources

  5. Departmentalization • The basis by which jobs are grouped together. • By functions • Type of product • Basis of geography or territory • By process • Type of customer

  6. Chain of command • The unbroken line of authority that extends from the top of the organization to the lowest level and clarifies who reports to whom. • Authority – the rights inherent in a managerial position to give orders and to expect the orders to be obeyed • Unity of command – a subordinate should have only one superior to whom he or she is directly responsible

  7. Span of control • The number of subordinates a manager can efficiently and effectively direct. • Narrow - can maintain close supervision • Expensive, as they add levels to management • Vertical communication more complex • Encourage tight supervision and discourage employee autonomy • Wider – reduce costs, cut overhead, speed up decision making, increase flexibility • Investing heavily on training

  8. Centralization and decentralization • The degree to which decision making is concentrated at a single point in the organization • The degree to which decision making requires multiple parties to make their own independent decisions.

  9. Formalization • The degree to which jobs within the organization are standardized. • High – minimum amount of discretion over what is to be done, when it is to be done, and how he/she should do it • Low – non-programmed job, employees have a great deal of freedom to exercise discretion in their work.

  10. Organizational designs • Simple structure • Bureaucracy • Matrix structure

  11. Simple structure • A structure characterized by a low degree of departmentalization, wide spans of control, authority decentralized in a single person, and a little formalization.

  12. Simple structure • Strength • Fast, flexible and accountability is clear • Weakness • As organization grows, it become inadequate

  13. Bureaucracy • A structure with highly routine operating tasks achieved through specialization, very formalized rules and regulations, tasks that are grouped into functional departments, centralized authority, narrow spans of control and decision making that follows the chain of command.

  14. Bureaucracy • Strength • Ability to perform standardized activity in a highly efficient manner • Economies of scale, minimum duplication of personnel and equipment • Weakness • Specialization creates subunit conflicts • Obsessive concern with following the rules

  15. The matrix structure • A structure that creates dual lines of authority and combines functional and product departmentalization.

  16. The matrix structure • Strength • Facilitate the efficient allocation of specialists and sharing of specialized resources across products. • Facilitate coordination when the organization has a multiplicity of complex activities                     • Weakness • Creates confusion

  17. New structural options • Team structure • Virtual organization • Boundaryless organization

  18. Team structure • The use of teams as the central device to coordinate work activities. • Breaks down departmental barriers • Decentralizes decision making • Require employees who are specialists

  19. Virtual organization • A small, core organization that outsources major business functions. • Highly centralized with little or no departmentalization • Drawback – reduces management’s control over key parts of its business

  20. Boundaryless organization • An organization that seeks to eliminate the chain of command, have limitless spans of control, and replace departments with empowered teams. • ideal or companies in the growing technology industry. • communicate mainly through email, phone and other virtual methods rather than more traditional face-to-face communication

  21. Mechanistic versus organic models

  22. Why do structures differ? • Strategy • Size • Technology • Environment

  23. Strategy • Innovation strategy – a strategy that emphasizes the introduction of major new products and services. • Cost-minimization strategy – a strategy that emphasizes tight cost controls, avoidance of unnecessary innovation or marketing expenses and price cutting. • Imitation strategy – a strategy that seeks to move into new products or new markets only after their viability has already been proven

  24. Strategy – structure relationship

  25. SIZE • Large – tend to have more specialization, more departmentalization, more vertical levels and more rules and regulations TECHNOLOGY • How an organization transfers its inputs to outputs. ENVIRONMENT • Institutions or forces outside that potentially affect the organization’s performance.

More Related