1 / 18

Raymond Pecheone Stanford University April 16, 2008

The Thinking Behind · PACT· •••••abridged & amended (amendled)••••• P erformance A ssessment for C alifornia T eachers. Raymond Pecheone Stanford University April 16, 2008. 1. The PACT Assessment System.

tyrone-strong
Télécharger la présentation

Raymond Pecheone Stanford University April 16, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Thinking Behind·PACT·•••••abridged & amended (amendled)•••••PerformanceAssessment forCaliforniaTeachers • Raymond Pecheone • Stanford University • April 16, 2008 1

  2. The PACT Assessment System • A performance assessment for teacher candidates created in response to SB 2042, with new subject matter standards, new program standards, and new assessment standards • Alternate assessments permitted must meet California Quality Standards for reliability/validity (i.e., AERA/APA test standards). • Aligned with the California Teaching Performance Expectations (standards) and California Content Standards • High stakes assessment designed to initially license beginning teachers 2

  3. PACT Institutions • Cal Poly — SLO • CSU Channel Islands • CSU Chico • CSU Dominguez Hills • CSU Monterey Bay • CSU Northridge • Humboldt State • Sacramento State • San Diego State • San Francisco State • San Jose State • Sonoma State • Stanford • Holy Names University • Mills College • Notre Dame de Namur University • Pepperdine University • St. Mary’s College of California • University of the Pacific • University of San Diego • Antioch University • USC • San Diego Intern • UC Berkeley • UC Davis • UC Irvine • UCLA • UC Riverside • UC San Diego • UC Santa Barbara • UC Santa Cruz 3

  4. The PACT Assessment System The Capstone Teaching Event Assessments Embedded in Local Programs — examples — • Teaching Event • Demonstrates : • Planning • Instruction • Assessing • Reflecting • Academic Language Child Case Studies Analyses of Student Learning Curriculum /Teaching Analyses Observation/Supervisory Evaluation & Feedback 4

  5. Teaching Event Records of Practice* * 24 Teaching Events in 13 credential areas 5

  6. Teaching Event Subject Areas • Single Subject • Agriculture • English language arts • History social science • Mathematics • Science • Art • Music • Physical Education • World languages • Multiple Subjects • Literacy • Mathematics 6

  7. Guiding Questions and Analytic Rubrics • ASSESSMENT • Analyzing Student Work From an Assessment • Using Assessment to Inform Teaching • REFLECTION • Monitoring Student Progress • Reflecting on Teaching • ACADEMIC LANGUAGE • Understanding Language Demands • Supporting Academic Language Development • PLANNING • Establishing a Balanced Instructional Focus • Making Content Accessible • Designing Assessments • INSTRUCTION • Engaging Students in Learning • Monitoring Student Learning During Instruction 7

  8. Balance Concepts & Understanding Skills & Procedures Problem Solving

  9. PACT Rubrics (one example) 9

  10. PACT Teaching Event · DNA • Documents teaching of learning segment (3-5 lessons or hours of instruction) • Subject specific • Standardized tasks & core questions across programs • Scored with common rubrics, passing standard • During student teaching 10

  11. For More Information... • See Teaching Event Handbooks and Rubrics at www.pacttpa.org. 11

  12. Actions Scoring theTE Program Meetings Professional Development PACT Advisor Analysis of Candidate Work Collaborativeplanning acrossUniversity &K-12 schools 12

  13. The Research Base for Teacher Licensing Tests • Weak relationship between traditional licensing tests and teacher effectiveness (NRC, 2001) • Strauss & Sawyer (1986) • Ferguson (1991, 1998) • Ferguson & Ladd (1996) • Clotfelter, Ladd, & Vigdor (forthcoming) • Goldhaber (2005, 2006) • Effect sizes quite small in recent value added research (.01 .06) 13

  14. Educative Assessment • Teachers Matter • Subject Matter Matters • Preparation (support) Matters • Authenticity Matters • Integration of Practice Matters 14

  15. California Teaching Performance Expectations • TPE 7 · Teaching English Learners • TPE 8 · Learning about Students • TPE 9 · Instructional Planning • TPE 10 · Instructional Time • TPE 11 · Social Environment • TPE 12 · Professional, Legal, and Ethical Obligations • TPE 13 · Professional Growth • TPE 1 · Specific Pedagog-ical Skills for Subject Matter Instruction • TPE 2 · Monitoring Student Learning During Instruction • TPE 3 · Interpretation and Use of Assessments • TPE 4 · Making Content Accessible • TPE 5 · Student Engagement • TPE 6 · Developmentally Appropriate Teaching Practices 15

  16. What is Subject Specific about the Teaching Event? • Focus of learning segment & aligned to Ca. content standards • Teaching/learning tasks on video clip(s) • Additional prompts in some content areas (e.g., misconceptions in science, dispositions in mathematics, description of text in English/language arts) • Common and subject specific rubrics • Benchmarkswithin subject areas 16

  17. Scoring • Trained and calibrated subject specific assessors • Campus based with central audits & regional scoring 17

  18. Questions? • More info on web site, http://www.pacttpa.org/ • Call or email me • 530 752-8784 • ammendle@ucdavis.edu

More Related