Uploaded by ulani

3 SLIDES

216 VUES

30LIKES

TK87: Two Column or T-proof TK91: Mid-segment Theorem

DESCRIPTION

TK87: Two Column or T-proof TK91: Mid-segment Theorem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

1. TK87: Two Column or T-proofTK91: Mid-segment Theorem

2. TK87: Two Column or T-Proof If WASH is a parallelogram, then

A Geometric Proof Of Napoleon’s Theorem

A Geometric Proof Of Napoleon’s Theorem. Chrissy Folsom June 8, 2000 Math 495b. Napoleon the Mathematician?. Theorem named after Napoleon Bonaparte. Questionable as to whether he really deserves credit. Some sources say he excelled in math.

930 views • 15 slides

5.6 Indirect Proof &amp; Inequalities in Two Triangles

5.6 Indirect Proof &amp; Inequalities in Two Triangles. Geometry Mrs. Spitz Fall 2004. Objectives:. Read and write an indirect proof Use the Hinge Theorem and its Converse to compare side lengths and angle measures. Assignment. pp. 305-306 #1-24 all. Using Indirect Proof.

413 views • 19 slides

Homework Answers

Homework Answers. P.244 5. Angle B 9. Proof 11. Proof 18. Proof P. 251 35. Proof 37. SAS 39. ASA. Midsegments of Triangles. Math 2 - Lesson 24 Mr. Lopez. Midsegment. The midsegment of a triangle is the segment connecting the midpoints of two sides. Midsegment Theorem:

253 views • 6 slides

Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition

Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition. Lecture 17 Section 3.6 Mon, Feb 19, 2007. Form of Proof by Contraposition. Theorem: p  q . This is logically equivalent to  q   p . Outline of the proof of the theorem: Assume  q . Prove  p . Conclude that p  q .

628 views • 14 slides

Proof Techniques (Rosen, Sections 1.5, 1.6, 1.7)

Proof Techniques (Rosen, Sections 1.5, 1.6, 1.7). TOPICS Direct Proofs Proof by Contrapositive Proof by Contradiction Proof by Cases. Proof Terminology. Theorem : statement that can be shown to be true Proof : a valid argument that establishes the truth of a theorem

483 views • 18 slides

Chapter 3

Chapter 3. Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof. 3.4. Direct Proof and Counterexample 4 Division into Cases and the Quotient-Remainder Theorem. Quotient-Remainder Theorem. Theorem 3.4.1 The Quotient-Remainder Theorem

333 views • 10 slides

Grade 8 Pythagorean Theorem

Grade 8 Pythagorean Theorem. Understand and apply the Pythagorean Theorem. Explain a proof of the Pythagorean Theorem and its converse. . Here is one of many proofs of the Pythagorean Theorem. . How does this prove the Pythagorean Theorem?. Grade 8 Pythagorean Theorem.

2.39k views • 34 slides

Chapter 3. Mathematical Reasoning

Chapter 3. Mathematical Reasoning. 3.1 Methods of proof. A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true. A proof is to demonstrate that a theorem is true with a sequence of statements that form an argument.

329 views • 16 slides

Splash Screen

Splash Screen. Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 4–1) CCSS Then/Now New Vocabulary Theorem 4.1: Triangle Angle-Sum Theorem Proof: Triangle Angle-Sum Theorem Example 1: Real-World Example: Use the Triangle Angle-Sum Theorem Theorem 4.2: Exterior Angle Theorem

488 views • 27 slides

Proof of the Pumping Theorem for Regular Languages

Proof of the Pumping Theorem for Regular Languages. Richard Beigel EECS University of Illinois at Chicago. The Pumping Theorem for Regular Languages. If L is regular then  N  z such that z  L and | z |  N

234 views • 13 slides

Theorem

Theorem. For g : R  R If X is a discrete random variable then If X is a continuous random variable Proof: We proof it for the discrete case. Let Y = g ( X ) then. Example to illustrate steps in proof. Suppose i.e. and the possible values of X are

681 views • 20 slides

Geometry

Geometry. 2.6 Algebraic Proofs. Algebraic proof- proof made up of a series of algebraic statements Two-column Proof/Formal Proof- contains statements and reasons organized in two columns. Properties of Real Numbers. Addition: If a=b, then a+c = a+b Subtraction: If a=b, then a-c=b-c

288 views • 5 slides

Mazm-Orlicz Theorem

Mazm-Orlicz Theorem. Linearly open. Lemma 1. Proof of Lemma 1 p.1. Proof of Lemma 1 p.2. Remark. Proof of Remark p.1. Corollary To Lemma 1. Proof of Corollary. Convex cone. Define P. ?. Proof of ? P.1. Proof of ? P.2. Lemma 2( 証明很重要 ). Proof of Lemma 2 P.1.

514 views • 35 slides

Advanced Geometry 5.1

Advanced Geometry 5.1. Indirect proof. 2-Column Proof Form: 2-column format Begin with the GIVEN statements Goal: Prove a statement directly. Indirect Proof Form: Paragraph form Begin with the PROVE statement Goal: Achieve a contradiction of an assumption to complete the proof.

239 views • 6 slides

The PCP Theorem via gap amplification

The PCP Theorem via gap amplification. Irit Dinur Hebrew University. P rob. C heckable. P roof. The PCP Theorem [AroraSafra, AroraLundMotwaniSudanSzegedy, 1992]. If sat(  ) = 1 then 9 proof , Pr[ Ver accepts] = 1 If sat(  ) &lt; 1 then 8 proof , Pr[ Ver accepts] &lt; ½. Verifier.

508 views • 28 slides

Theorem 40

Theorem 40. By Jimmy Wymer. Theorem 40. If two parallel lines are cut by a transversal, each pair of interior angles on the same side of the transversal are supplementary. Given: AB||CD Conclusion: &lt;AEG=&lt;CFE. Proof of Theorem 40.

312 views • 8 slides

5.6 Indirect Proof &amp; Inequalities in Two Triangles

567 views • 19 slides

Verifying the F o u r Colour Theorem

Verifying the F o u r Colour Theorem. Georges Gonthier Microsoft Research Cambridge. 150 years of history…. 1852 Conjecture ( Guthrie → DeMorgan ) 1878 Publication ( Cayley ) 1879 First proof ( Kempe ) 1880 Second proof ( Tait ) 1890 Rebuttal ( Heawood )

485 views • 31 slides

Chomp

Crystal Bennett Joshua Chukwuka Advisor: Dr. K. Berg. Chomp. Chomp. Game Setup Rules of gameplay Positions Theorem 1 Proof of Theorem 1 Approach to 3x5 Approach to 3xn Theorem 1 Theorem 2 Theorem 3. Game Setup. Standard game consists of a grid of size mxn .

983 views • 65 slides

The PCP theorem

The PCP theorem. Summary. Proof structure Basic ingredients Arithmetization Properties of polynomials 3-SAT belongs to PCP[O( n 3 ) , O(1)]. Proof structure. 3-SAT  PCP[log, polylog ]. 3-SAT  PCP[log, polylog ]. composition lemma. 3-SAT  PCP[log, polyloglog ].

402 views • 26 slides

More Related

TK87: Two Column or T-proof TK91: Mid-segment Theorem

TK87: Two Column or T-proof TK91: Mid-segment Theorem

Presentation Transcript

A Geometric Proof Of Napoleon’s Theorem

5.6 Indirect Proof &amp;amp; Inequalities in Two Triangles

Homework Answers

Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition

Menu

Proof Techniques (Rosen, Sections 1.5, 1.6, 1.7)

Chapter 3

Grade 8 Pythagorean Theorem

Chapter 3. Mathematical Reasoning

Splash Screen

Proof of the Pumping Theorem for Regular Languages

Theorem

Geometry

Mazm-Orlicz Theorem

Advanced Geometry 5.1

The PCP Theorem via gap amplification

Theorem 40

5.6 Indirect Proof &amp;amp; Inequalities in Two Triangles

Verifying the F o u r Colour Theorem

Chomp

The PCP theorem

5.6 Indirect Proof & Inequalities in Two Triangles

5.6 Indirect Proof & Inequalities in Two Triangles