1 / 7

Classification, etc. status at UW

Classification, etc. status at UW. New application to apply trees to existing tuple Background rejection for the v7r2 “500M” run at SLAC”: first look at v7r3. Application of boosted trees. New application in GlastClassify package: apply

ulema
Télécharger la présentation

Classification, etc. status at UW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Classification, etc. status at UW • New application to apply trees to existing tuple • Background rejection for the v7r2 “500M” run at SLAC”: first look at v7r3. T. Burnett

  2. Application of boosted trees • New application in GlastClassify package: apply • Adds or replaces tuple values with recalculated “CT” variables • CTgoodCal • CTvertex • CTgoodPsf • CTgamma • CTgammaType • Code and tree data tagged, in GlastRelease. root [2] t.Print("CT*") ****************************************************************************** *Tree :MeritTuple: Glast tuple * *Entries : 2561797 : Total = 3177205466 bytes File Size = 1533597317 * * : : Tree compression factor = 2.07 * ****************************************************************************** *Br 0 :CTgoodCal : CTgoodCal/D * *Entries : 2561797 : Total Size= 20562918 bytes File Size = 1436513 * *Baskets : 642 : Basket Size= 32000 bytes Compression= 14.30 * *............................................................................* *Br 1 :CTvertex : CTvertex/D * *Entries : 2561797 : Total Size= 20562270 bytes File Size = 881183 * *Baskets : 642 : Basket Size= 32000 bytes Compression= 23.31 * *............................................................................* *Br 2 :CTgoodPsf : CTgoodPsf/D * *Entries : 2561797 : Total Size= 20562918 bytes File Size = 7866711 * *Baskets : 642 : Basket Size= 32000 bytes Compression= 2.61 * *............................................................................* *Br 3 :CTgamma : CTgamma/D * *Entries : 2561797 : Total Size= 20561622 bytes File Size = 1407513 * *Baskets : 642 : Basket Size= 32000 bytes Compression= 14.59 * *............................................................................* *Br 4 :CTgammaType : CTgammaType/D * *Entries : 2561797 : Total Size= 20564214 bytes File Size = 2332929 * *Baskets : 642 : Basket Size= 32000 bytes Compression= 8.80 * *............................................................................* T. Burnett

  3. Effect of boosting • train_efficiency: single tree. Train on UW v7r2 background runs • test_efficiency: after boosting 10 times, v2r2 SLAC v7r2 runs T. Burnett

  4. SLAC v7r2 “500M” livetime: • Simply count the runs that have data. • Note: the number of events per run, or second, is less than the down-link rate (~550 Hz) due to the “prune”. • Above gives 8753 seconds T. Burnett

  5. Current status of UW background rejection Fails science requirement T. Burnett

  6. New “500 M” v3r3 run – 7516 s Fails science requirement T. Burnett

  7. Conclusions, plans • The “500M” runs are enough to check science requirement out to ~30 GeV • With Tracy, about to restore “IM” variables, when Bill finishes new trees. (Need to decide on names) • Will retrain the boosted trees using v7r3, new variables • Need to verify energy and psf cuts, start psf fits (just a button push for TB or Jim) • When Riccardo gives us his trees, we can make 3-way comparison T. Burnett

More Related