1 / 5

Method

Method. Participants In total, 26 participants (19 females and 7 males) Mean age of 24 yrs ( SD = 2.46; range = 20-28) Materials Karolinska sleepiness scale (KSS), 9-point Likert scale Physiological sleepiness via EEG Driving task: spectral analysis of O1-A2

ulema
Télécharger la présentation

Method

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Method • Participants • In total, 26 participants (19 females and 7 males) • Mean age of 24 yrs (SD = 2.46; range = 20-28) • Materials • Karolinska sleepiness scale (KSS), 9-point Likert scale • Physiological sleepiness via EEG • Driving task: spectral analysis of O1-A2 • Nap break: C3-A2 scored for SOL and sleep staging • Driving stimulus: Hazard Perception task • Hazard perception is the driving skill to anticipate that a traffic situation may result in a crash or a near miss • Importantly it is the only driving skill that has a consistent relationship with actual on-road crashes (i.e., criterion validity) NRMA - ACT ROAD SAFETY TRUST

  2. Method (2) • Procedure • On testing days participants woke at 05:00 • No caffeine or alcohol until completion of testing • Instructed to “Stop when you think you would be too sleepy to drive safely on the road” • Design • Experimental design: participants randomly assigned to the morning (09:00) or afternoon (14:00) start time Duration of driving NRMA - ACT ROAD SAFETY TRUST KSS 2 KSS 1 30 min nap break Hazard Perception driving simulation task 5 mins EEG 5 mins EEG

  3. Results M = 8.15 Sig increase M = 6.65 Duration of driving NRMA - ACT ROAD SAFETY TRUST No sig change Theta and alpha power levels KSS 2 KSS 1 30 min nap break • Duration of driving: M = 36.1 mins (SD = 17.7; range = 15-76) • No participant could have been judged to have fallen asleepby standard criteria Hazard Perception driving simulation task 5 mins EEG 5 mins EEG

  4. Results (2) • Subjective sleepiness (KSS) detected an increase in sleepiness levels • Physiological sleepiness (EEG) levels did not change over the duration of drive • No circadian effects evident in any data source • Large variability of driving durations Thirty minute nap break data (n = 23) Note. SOL = sleep onset latency (min); REM = Rapid Eye Movement NRMA - ACT ROAD SAFETY TRUST

  5. Comments or Questions? christopher.watling@qut.edu.au NRMA - ACT ROAD SAFETY TRUST

More Related