1 / 21

Municipalization of programs and services in open environment of

PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK GROUP OF STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN ETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS - GEPEDH. Municipalization of programs and services in open environment of juvenile offenders in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Work Group

ulysses-mccarthy
Télécharger la présentation

Municipalization of programs and services in open environment of

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORKGROUP OF STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN ETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS - GEPEDH Municipalization of programs and services in open environment of juvenileoffenders in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil . Work Group Paz Hummes, Alessandra; Giacomelli Henriques da Cunha, Liziane; Avila, Lisélen; Prado, Alessandra; da Silva Cunha, Debora Regina; Milani Leal, Graziela Coordenação Profa. Dra. Beatriz G. Aguinsky – PPGSS/PUCRS

  2. Introduction Previousresearche(2009) = juvenileoffendersdeprivedoffreedom - Rio Grande do Sul. New landmarks = Social Policies regulations SINASE/SUAS

  3. Youth offenders – till the age of 18 years Specialized Police Departmen for youth Prosecutors Office for the youth Juvenile Specialized Court Socio-educational Measures/ Art. 112 Executor Service - Organ of Social Protection Policy CREAS- Reference CenterSpecialized Adolescents in conflict with the law: trajectory in the Justice System and Socio-Educational Services

  4. What are the social and educational measures? (art. 112 / ECA) Open environment social and educational measures I - warning;II - the obligation to repair the damage;III - services to the community - PSC;IV - probation - LA. Measures of freedom deprivation V – inclusion in a Program of partial freedom; VI – deprivation of freedom; VII – Protection measures of art. 101, I a VI. (BRASIL, 1990, p. 22).

  5. Regarding munipalization: • The open environment measures shall happen at the municipal level, in the community where adolescents live in order to strengthen family and community bonds • Responsibility of the State or Federal Government = funding and / or technical support(SINASE, 2006); • Municipalities should promote a municipal plan regardin socioeducationa measures for juvenile(SINASE, 2008).

  6. Metodologia • Different institutional arrangements of Programs/services in 9 cities • Study of qualitative nature that also seek qualitative information that is quantifiable. • The main techniques for collection, analysis and interpretation of data • is documentary analysis, interviews, questionnaires and content • analysis (BARDIN, 1977) . Quantifiable information is treated with simple statistic method. • Ethical Care - Approval of the Ethics Committee. All participants previously received information about research and about the voluntary nature of participation, signing consent form(TCLE).

  7. Research Objectives • Conduct a situational diagnosis regarding municipalized socio-educational measures in RS. • Analyze how the municipalization of programs and services in open environment for juvenile offenders is being carried out, considering the interface between the parameters of SINASE e do SUAS.

  8. Passo Fundo Santo Ângelo Caixas do Sul Uruguaiana Novo Hamburgo São Leopoldo Santa Maria Porto Alegre Included Municipalities: same that participated in previous research of Freedom Deprivation (2009). Inclusion Criteria: see the Socioeducational System as a whole. Pelotas

  9. Sujeitos, Técnicas e Instrumentos • Adolescents: 42 participants. Interview based on a form; • Managers of the Programs/services: 21 participants. Interview based on a form and use of a questionnaire; • Key informants System Guarantee of Rights: judge, prosecutor, defender, manager of policy, delegate and expert adviser to CMDCA= 54 participants. Interview based on a form and use of a questionnaire 117 participants

  10. Male FAMILIESIN A SITUATION OFSOCIAL VULNERABILITY Repeated offenses ADOLESCENTS LITTLE STUDY Types of infractions Robbery, theft,drug dealing,injury SUBSTANCE ABUSE Who are the adolescents in open environment services or programs?

  11. Program/Services and e the Rights Guarantee System

  12. MUNICIPAL SOCIOEDUCATIONAL PLAN MUNICÍPIOS: SITUAÇÃO: Caxias do Sul NÃO São Leopoldo NÃO Novo Hamburgo NÃO Santa Maria SIM Santo Ângelo NÃO Passo Fundo SIM Uruguaiana SIM Pelotas NÃO Porto Alegre NÃO No = 6; yes = 3

  13. Responsible agencies

  14. Situation of the Programs/services:

  15. Results Municipalitionofprogramsandservices in open environmentofjuvenileoffenders – RGS is in halfway = to much to fullfillconsideringnew Social Policies Landmarksof SINASE and SUAS • Beginningofthisprocess = late 90’s andearly 2000. • The implementation of the Unified Social Protection (SUAS) typifies this service as one to be performed at the Centers for Specialized Social Assistance Reference (CREAS) by qualified and interdisciplinary teams relying on social workers, psychologists and pedagogues, etc.. (SUAS, 2005)

  16. Results • The constitution of the technical staff has not yet been fullyachieved in these services, as required by the new Brazilian legislationon the subject. • We also found a lack of professionalsto fulfill the demands of the services and a lack of training for the workspecifically with socio-educational measures in an open environment.

  17. Results Regarding the management arrangements of the services studied, we found that the local governmentsof Municipalities are primarily responsible for the services and in some cities there is shared responsibility with NGOs, and the municipalitiesare in a transition phase of the implementing agencies Regardinginstitutional arrangements, it was found that the promotion of humanrights of adolescents is mostly fulfilled by social policies carried out foradolescents in general in the municipalities.

  18. Results The lack of knowledge regarding specific Social Policies related with Socioeducational mesuares are related to poor planing and poor quality of services. The fragil integration between the net of Guarantee of Rights System and Social Protection Services contribute to bureacratization of services interving in the quality of the services In the absence of clear references, the socioeducational pourposes of the measures tend to be substitute by plain punitive sense in interventions, that lack of sense for the needs of adolescents Proposals – strengthen programs in the network system of guaranteed rights; training of professionals and managers; listening to the adolescents – they have much to propose

  19. REFERÊNCIAS BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Rio de Janeiro. Edições 70, 1977. BRASIL. Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente. Lei federal 8069/90. BRASIL. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate a Fome. Norma Operacional Básica NOB/SUAS. Brasília, jul, 2005. Disponível em: <http://www.congemas.org.br/NOBversaofinal.pdf>. Acesso em 03 mar. 2010. CAO/IJ-Centro de Apoio Operacional das Promotorias de Justiça da Infância e da Juventude. Apontamentos sobre a política socioeducativas segundo as diretrizes. Estabelecidas no Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente,MINAS GERAIS, 2008. SARAIVA, João Batista da Costa. Adolescente em conflito com a lei: da indiferença à proteção integral: uma abordagem sobre a responsabilidade penal juvenil. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2009

  20. REFERÊNCIAS SIMÕES, Carlos. Curso de Direito do Serviço Social. São Paulo: Cortez, 2007. SISTEMA NACIONAL DE ATENDIMENTO SÓCIOEDUCATIVO - SINASE. Secretaria Especial dos Direitos Humanos. Brasília: CONANDA, 2006.

  21. OBRIGADA! Thank you aguinsky@pucrs.br

More Related