1 / 14

Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Data Integrity Professionals. Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield Victoria Thomason. Entity Relationship Model. Logical Database Design. Familiarity with Business Processes (High) Team (Moderate)

umay
Télécharger la présentation

Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Data Integrity Professionals Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield Victoria Thomason

  2. Entity Relationship Model

  3. Logical Database Design

  4. Familiarity with Business Processes (High) • Team (Moderate) • Team is knowledgeable of the as-is system and has gained even more knowledge through interviews with the Housing directors • Client (High) • Students will be able to submit their technical problems to Housing’s database. • The maintenance director will be able to view work orders and locate housing networking devices. Technical Feasibility (Moderate)

  5. Familiarity with Technology (Moderate) • Team (High) • Hardware • All members have used personal computers, servers, and PDAs. • Software (Moderate to high) • Windows OS • Dreamweaver, VS, Excel, PowerPoint, Access, Visio, Project, Windows Server 2003 and XP, and Firefox used to create and implement the future system • The members have a moderate- to high-level knowledge of multiple computer languages Technical Feasibility (cont.)

  6. Familiarity with Technology (Moderate) (cont.)  • Client (Moderate) • Users of the “to-be” system: • Computer techs • Housing staff • On-campus students • Project Size: (Moderate) • 3 computer techs • 2 months of design and implementation • Relatively low development costs • Low financial risk Technical Feasibility (cont.)

  7. Cost Benefit Analysis

  8. Project Champion • Richard Robinson, Assistant IT Director • Organizational Management • Melanie Peel, Louisiana Tech Housing Director • Annie Jantz, Room Assignments Coordinator • Systems Users • Main users • Computer Techs • On-Campus Students • Maintenance Director • Housing Staff • Other stakeholders • Parents of on-campus students Organizational Feasibility (Moderate)

  9. Size Risk Assessment

  10. Technical Risk Assessment

  11. Technical Risk Assessment (cont.)

  12. Structure Risk Assessment

  13. Total Risk

  14. Adjustments: Size Risk Adjustments: None Technical Risk Adjustments: Project team may need to review software required to build the system. Structure Risk Adjustments: Basing new web-based entry forms on current work order forms may assist in the transition to the new system, reducing risk. Risk Reduction

More Related