1 / 41

Guidelines for Preparing INCO-2005-C-WBC/SSA-3 Project Proposals

This document outlines crucial steps and components for preparing project proposals under the INCO-2005-C-WBC/SSA-3 call. It includes detailed instructions on proposal structure, administrative requirements, and evaluation criteria. Key sections include a summary, project objectives, relevance to call objectives, potential impact, resource allocation, project management strategies, and plans for implementation. Important timelines for submission and contract preparation are highlighted to ensure compliance with project application procedures.

umed
Télécharger la présentation

Guidelines for Preparing INCO-2005-C-WBC/SSA-3 Project Proposals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project Proposals Under FPx CECRA: answering INCO-2005-C-WBC/SSA-3 Malcolm Watson, MChem. Section for Chemical Technology and Environmental Protection

  2. Timeline of FP6 Project Applications • Call opens - 3 months before proposal deadline, Dec 2005 • Notification of intention to submit a proposal • Proposal submission – on paper or online, Mar 2006 • Part A: Admin section - general information • Part B: The proposal • Proposal evaluation • Negotiation, Oct 2006 • Contract Preparation Forms • Technical Annex – based on the proposal • Signing the Contract, Dec2006

  3. The Proposal – Part A • Part A: Administration • A1: General information on proposal • A2: Information on participants – one A2 form must be filled in by each participant • A3: Financial Information NB: Allow plenty of time for online submission – registration alone is slow and complicated

  4. The Proposal – Part B • Part B: The proposal • Front page • Contents page • B0. Proposal summary • B1. Objectives of the proposed project • B2. Relevance to the objectives of the call • B3. Potential impact • B4. Project resources • B5. Project management • B6. Detailed Implementation Plan • B7. Other issues

  5. The Call: INCO-WBC/SSA-3 • Priorities for the single call SSA in 2005 • Networking, academic visits, hiring young researchers, maintaining S&T capacity • Criteria for relevance • Deliverables • Contribution to Research and Technological Development • Networking with other EU insitutions • Increased job oppurtunities

  6. The Proposal – Part B • Part B: The proposal • Front page • Contents page • B0. Proposal summary • B1. Objectives of the proposed project • B2. Relevance to the objectives of the call • B3. Potential impact • B4. Project resources • B5. Project management • B6. Detailed Implementation Plan • B7. Other issues

  7. The Proposal – Part B • Part B: The proposal • Front page • Contents page • B0. Proposal summary • B1. Objectives of the proposed project • B2. Relevance to the objectives of the call • B3. Potential impact • B4. Project resources • B5. Project management • B6. Detailed Implementation Plan • B7. Other issues

  8. Objectives

  9. Objectives

  10. The Proposal – Part B • Part B: The proposal • Front page • Contents page • B0. Proposal summary • B1. Objectives of the proposed project • B2. Relevance to the objectives of the call • B3. Potential impact • B4. Project resources • B5. Project management • B6. Detailed Implementation Plan • B7. Other issues – ethics

  11. Relevance to the call

  12. The Proposal – Part B • Part B: The proposal • Front page • Contents page • B0. Proposal summary • B1. Objectives of the proposed project • B2. Relevance to the objectives of the call • B3. Potential impact-in Serbia, in the EU, for academia, for industry, for the general public • B4. Project resources • B5. Project management • B6. Detailed Implementation Plan • B7. Other issues

  13. The Proposal – Part B • Part B: The proposal • Front page • Contents page • B0. Proposal summary • B1. Objectives of the proposed project • B2. Relevance to the objectives of the call • B3. Potential impact • B4. Project resources-human and financial • B5. Project management • B6. Detailed Implementation Plan • B7. Other issues

  14. Human Resources

  15. Human resources

  16. Project effort form template

  17. (person months)

  18. Financial resources

  19. The Proposal – Part B • Part B: The proposal • Front page • Contents page • B0. Proposal summary • B1. Objectives of the proposed project • B2. Relevance to the objectives of the call • B3. Potential impact • B4. Project resources • B5. Project management • B6. Detailed Implementation Plan • B7. Other issues

  20. B6. Detailed Implementation Plan • Introduction • Methodology • Critical path analysis • Ganntogram • Pert diagram • Work package list • Deliverables list • Work package Descriptions • Objectives, Deliverables, Milestones

  21. Ganntogram

  22. Pert Diagram

  23. Workpackage list

  24. Deliverables list

  25. Workpackage descriptions

  26. The Proposal – Part B • Part B: The proposal • Front page • Contents page • B0. Proposal summary • B1. Objectives of the proposed project • B2. Relevance to the objectives of the call • B3. Potential impact • B4. Project resources • B5. Project management • B6. Detailed Implementation Plan • B7. Other issues

  27. Ethical Issues

  28. The Proposal – Part B • Part B: The proposalPages • Front page 1 • Contents page 1 • B0. Proposal summary 1 • B1. Objectives of the proposed project 2 • B2. Relevance to the objectives of the call 3 • B3. Potential impact 3 • B4. Project resources 5.5 • B5. Project management 2.5 • B6. Detailed Implementation Plan13 • B7. Other issues 2 Total with appendices 35

  29. Evaluation • 5 criteria used to judge proposal: • Relevance – to the call • Quality of the support action – competence of institution, coherence of planned activities, methodology • Potential impact – in Serbia and entire EU • Quality of the management – is their sufficient support for Coordinator – decision structure • Mobilisation of resources – are the correct people being utilised, is the expenditure predicted justified.

  30. ESR

  31. Negotiation • Contract Preparation Forms (CPFs) • More detailed version of Part A from proposal – bank details, various legal declarations • Contract Technical Annex • Based on the proposal, restructured. • Any changes to your proposal suggested by the EC or the evaluators must be implemented

More Related