1 / 32

Warren Roane Jamie Hicks Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD

EOC and Algebra I: A District Perspective. Warren Roane Jamie Hicks Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD. http://www.humbleisd.net/Page/38302. Brief History Impact on District and District Response Impact on Teachers and Teacher Response Impact on Students Future implications. Outline.

ura
Télécharger la présentation

Warren Roane Jamie Hicks Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EOC and Algebra I: A District Perspective Warren Roane Jamie Hicks Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD http://www.humbleisd.net/Page/38302

  2. Brief History Impact on District and District Response Impact on Teachers and Teacher Response Impact on Students Future implications Outline

  3. Voluntary EOC ca. 1994-1999 Required EOC ca. 1999-2001 Required TAKS 2002-2011 Voluntary EOC 2005-2010 Required 2012 EOC with 15% requirement Brief History of EOC Algebra

  4. Brief History of EOC Algebra

  5. Legislation Decisions STAAR 15% Moratorium on 15% Live tests Release of EOC results EOC to TAKS bridge study Timeline of EOC Events

  6. Voluntary Field Test Mandatory Field Test Field Testing

  7. LiveTests Release of EOC results Bridge Study Release Spring 2012

  8. Mandatory Sampling Data file (who will test) Sending Receiving Live testing mixed with mandatory sampling Makeup testing District Testing

  9. Retesting Information: District Testing

  10. Storing Student EOC Information: Multiple Retakes Which Passing Standard? Cumulative Score and Graduation Plan Students who took Alg. I in 8th grade last year or out of state Field Test Results with Other Test Results District Impact

  11. 15% Grading Requirement: OPTION 1: Semester 1 average: 42.5% weight Semester 2 average: 42.5% weight Converted EOC score: 15% weight OPTION 2: Semester 1 average: 50% weight Semester 2 average: 35% weight Converted EOC score: 15% weight OPTION 3: Semester 1 grades at 85% with EOC 15% Semester 2 grades at 85% with EOC 15% Results averaged for the final course grade District Impact

  12. Other Decisions for 15%: Will 15% be included for GPA/Class Rank? Will retake scores be permitted to improve a student’s grade? Will semester credit be given? When awarded? Timing of results – when will grades be finalized? Will the district give semester tests in EOC-tested courses? What impact will this have on gradebook software and report cards? District Impact

  13. Accelerated Instruction: District required to provide for all students not achieving Level 2 on EOC How to notify student in a timely manner? How can we remediate with students when we do not yet receive detailed results? District Impact

  14. District and State field test results Projections from field test 2012 District and State results 2012 District and State EOC to TAKS bridge study results District Results

  15. District and State Results:Field Test 2010-2011

  16. Campus Study: Projections from Field Test

  17. District Curriculum Impact: Projections from the Field Test

  18. Alg. I Course Grade by Grade Level: Projections from the Field Test

  19. District 15% Policy:Projections from the Field Test

  20. District and State Results:EOC 2011-12 Raw Score

  21. District and State Results:EOC 2011-12

  22. District and State Results:EOC 2011-12

  23. District Results:EOC 2011-12

  24. District Results:EOC 2011-12

  25. 2012 District and State Results:Percent Met Standard TAKS, STAAR Bridge Study (Raw Score 15)

  26. District and State Results:EOC 2011-12 and TAKS 2012 State (all students) Failing TAKS 10% but 17.3 % below Level II District (all students) Failing TAKS at 2.4% but 8.6% below Level II

  27. Who should test Who tested Online- 78 Paper- 30 District Summer Testing

  28. TAKS versus EOC curriculum New EOC teaching materials Accountability by class period Value-added model: teacher name to student Impact on Teachers

  29. Repetition/summer school Additional testing Cumulative testing record Graduation type 15% impact on: graduation, GPA, class rank, college admission, summer school, tutoring Impact on Students

  30. Graduation rates-more difficult (AYP, State Accountability) College admission—fairness of diverse retesting/15% policies Money-Summer school/accelerated instruction budget Future Implications

  31. Questions? Contact information • Jamie Hicks, Coordinator of Student Assessment jamie.hicks@humble.k12.tx.us • Warren Roane, Director of Accountability warren.roane@humble.k12.tx.us • Mary Kay Gianoutsos, Assistant Director of Data Quality marykay.gianoutsos@humble.k12.tx.us

  32. Questions? PowerPoint Information http://www.humbleisd.net/Page/38302

More Related