1 / 19

Integrated Learning for Substance Use and Mental Health Treatment in Primary Care

This presentation discusses the integration of mental health and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment within primary care in the context of healthcare reform. It highlights models of co-located and integrated services, addressing barriers such as security issues, workforce challenges, and standard practices for universal screening and brief interventions. The presentation focuses on strategies to close gaps between primary and specialty care while building capacity for enhanced service delivery. It also shares insights on progress monitoring and staff perceptions through surveys, fostering a collaborative learning environment.

urbain
Télécharger la présentation

Integrated Learning for Substance Use and Mental Health Treatment in Primary Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrated Learning Collaborative Treatment of Substance Use and Mental Health Disorders in Primary Care in the Era of Health Reform February 22, 2012

  2. Integration of Mental Health & Substance Use Disorders into Primary Care: Models of Co-Located and Integrated Services Lily Alvarez Kern County Mental Health Darren Urada, PHD UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs

  3. What Does Our County Look Like? • Mental Health System of Care • Substance Abuse System of Care • FQHCs

  4. What MHSA Opportunities are Provided? • Integration • Workforce • Two services in same day • Address both MH and SUD • Time

  5. Spoken Goals • Universal screening • Brief interventions • Technology via health registries

  6. Unspoken Goals • Develop a value for the SAS • Develop the blood pressure cuff for SUD • Close the gap between primary care and specialty care • Demonstrate how to overcome security and privacy issues • Building capacity for 2014

  7. What is the Model? • Universal screening • Brief consultation in the exam room • Brief interventions • Integrated case conferencing • Using data to monitor progress

  8. Anticipated Barriers and Proposed Solutions • Being in the forefront; creating a learning environment • Competition; monthly provider meetings • Physician involvement; contractual requirements for case conferencing • New practice standards; technology transfer through events

  9. Current Barriers • Fear of recognizing the SUD patient • Filing in the medical record • Charting in the medical record

  10. Health Information Exchange • 42 CFR Part 2 requires: Individual consent Specificity Prohibits re-disclosure • Between primary care and specialty Diagnosis Lab results Medications

  11. UCLA and Evaluation • Prevalence • Baseline with the Dual Diagnosis Capability in Health Care Settings (DDCHCS) tool • The pipeline using i2i data • Perceptions and attitudes

  12. Prevalence Preliminary Results • Prevalence of depression • Prevalence of thought disorders • Prevalence of alcohol and drug

  13. DDCHCS Integration Measure: Baseline • Completed in 2011 • Follow-up planned in 2012 • A word about the scores… • “5” is not necessarily the goal • Although this is a measure of integration, for some sites it may be impossible or even undesirable to reach “5” on DDCHCS. • Not every hospital needs to be a Level-I trauma center. Not every site needs a 5 on DDCHCS. • This is a snapshot to allow sites to assess where they are, whatever the goal is.

  14. Administrative Data“Patient Pipeline” Referred for assess- ment All Patients Positive Screen Screened Positive Assessment Assessed Referred: on-site intervention Referred: off-site treatment NoShows Rec’d Inter- vention Rec’d Treat- ment

  15. Staff Perceptions & Attitudes Surveys Adapted from surveys developed by the Integrated Behavioral Health Project (http://www.ibhp.org/) Multiple versions used: • Behavioral Healthcare Provider Satisfaction Survey • Primary Care Provider Satisfaction Survey • Primary Care Provider Satisfaction Survey - Non PCP Staff

  16. Examples of survey questions (out of 23)

  17. * = Statistically significant difference in ratings between staff types

  18. Questions / Comments?

More Related