1 / 9

Robin Darton, on behalf of the PSSRU Team

DH Supported Schemes: Self-Completed or Interviewer-Administered Tools; and Staff or Residents as Respondents?. Robin Darton, on behalf of the PSSRU Team.

ursa-cook
Télécharger la présentation

Robin Darton, on behalf of the PSSRU Team

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DH Supported Schemes: Self-Completed or Interviewer-Administered Tools; and Staff or Residents as Respondents? Robin Darton, on behalf of the PSSRU Team Symposium: Capturing Daily Life in Retirement Developments: Methodological Issues; British Society of Gerontology Annual Conference, Sheffield, 6-8 September 2007

  2. PSSRU Evaluation of the Extra Care Housing Initiative: Project Team • Professor Ann Netten • Robin Darton • Theresia Bäumker • Jacquetta Holder • Lisa Nash • Ann-Marie Towers • Jane Dennett • Lesley Cox • 16 local researchers G:\Housing and Care Programme\Presentations\BSG2007SYMP.PPT

  3. The Extra Care Housing Initiative:PSSRU Evaluation (22 Schemes) • 2004/05 • 2 retirement villages: 250 & 270 units • 9 newbuild/remodelled: 432 units (37-75) • 2005/06 • 2 retirement villages: 124 & 225 units • 9 newbuild/remodelled: 372 units (35-48) G:\Housing and Care Programme\Presentations\BSG2007SYMP.PPT

  4. PSSRU Evaluation: Aims • Short- and long-term outcomes for residents and schemes (JRF) • Comparative costs (JRF) • Factors associated with costs and effectiveness • Role in overall balance of care • Impact of scheme design on quality of life (EPSRC – PSSRU/Sheffield) G:\Housing and Care Programme\Presentations\BSG2007SYMP.PPT

  5. PSSRU Evaluation:Opening Dates (as at July 2007) G:\Housing and Care Programme\Presentations\BSG2007SYMP.PPT

  6. PSSRU Evaluation:Main Study and JRF Study Design • Moving in • Assessment information (staff records) • Resident questionnaire (self-completion/interview) • 6 months • Assessment info follow-up & services (residents/staff) • JRF study interviews (4 residents, 2 staff) • 12 months • JRF study survey (all residents) & up to 250 interviews • 18 months (assessment info follow-up as at 6 months) • Financial information(LA & RSL) G:\Housing and Care Programme\Presentations\BSG2007SYMP.PPT

  7. PSSRU Evaluation:Additional Studies • Rowanberries, Bradford: Costs to all stakeholders before/after move in (JRF) • SCEAM-Extra: Develop SCEAM for practical use and extend to sheltered/extra care housing (EPSRC – PSSRU/Sheffield) • Assessment information & Resident questionnaire for second scheme in Wakefield (Wakefield MDC/Hanover) G:\Housing and Care Programme\Presentations\BSG2007SYMP.PPT

  8. PSSRU Evaluation:Issues for Data Collection • Changing timetable of scheme opening • Timing of initial data collection • No assessment for purchasers – need profile • Scale of study: no. of schemes and residents • Multiple agencies, differing over time & schemes • Priorities of different agencies • Consent prior to/during interview & response • Replacements for deaths/movers G:\Housing and Care Programme\Presentations\BSG2007SYMP.PPT

  9. PSSRU Evaluation:Role of Local Researcher • Liaison between PSSRU and scheme • Contact with scheme manager and staff • Contact residents and explain research • Obtain consent/ensure obtained • Deliver forms and undertake interviews • Maintain spreadsheet record • Maintain contact with scheme G:\Housing and Care Programme\Presentations\BSG2007SYMP.PPT

More Related